Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması

Kayhan Özkan

doi:10.29130/dubited.1167064

EN TR

Comparison of Field and Hatchery Practices in Spray Vaccination Against Infectious Bronchitis

Abstract

In this study, vaccine intake data obtained after the administration of infectious bronchitis vaccine to commercial broiler animals by spray method in hatchery and in the field were compared. Both applications were made using the spray method. In the study, spray infectious bronchitis (IB) vaccine was administered to one of the 2 broiler flocks with an entry capacity of 10,200 and 10,400 at the age of 1 day, and the other at the age of 12 days. Tracheal swabs were taken from the flocks in which both treatments were applied, and RT-PCR analysis was performed on the 4th day following vaccination. Tracheal swab samples were taken on the 5th day from the chicks sent to the farm after the incubation spray application and on the 17th day from the field sprayed herd. RT-PCR analysis was performed from swab samples. The presence of vaccine virus of both groups was compared with one sample t test. According to the findings obtained, the vaccine uptake values obtained after the spray application applied on the 1st day of incubation were statistically significant compared to the traditional field vaccination (p<0.05). Keeping the vaccine intake values of animals at an optimum level has limited success, as vaccine applications in the field contain many variables. In this study, it was determined that animals positioned in a uniform structure in the hatchery were vaccinated with the appropriate dose and technique, and had higher vaccine take rates compared to field vaccinations.

Keywords

Spray vaccine, Broiler vaccination, Infectious bronchitis, Broiler vaccination method

Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Bu çalışmada ticari broyler hayvanlara enfeksiyöz bronşit aşısının sprey yöntem ile kuluçkahanede ve sahadaki uygulamasının ardından elde edilen aşı alım verileri kıyaslanmıştır. Her iki uygulama sprey metot kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmada 10.200 ve 10.400 adet giriş kapasitesine sahip 2 adet broyler sürüsünün birine kuluçkahanede, 1 günlük yaşında, diğerine ise 12 günlük yaşta sprey enfeksiyöz bronşit (IB) aşısı uygulanmıştır. Aşılamayı takip eden 4. gün içerisinde her iki uygulamanın yapıldığı sürülerden trake sürüntüleri alınarak RT-PCR analizi yapılmıştır. Kuluçkahanede sprey uygulaması ardından çiftliğe gönderilen civcivlerden 5.gün ve saha sprey aşı uygulaması yapılan sürüden ise 17. gün trakeal sürüntü örnekleri alınmıştır. Sürüntü örneklerinden RT-PCR analizi yapılmıştır. Her iki grubun aşı virüsü varlığı one sample t testi ile kıyaslanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre kuluçkahanede 1. gün uygulanan sprey uygulaması sonrasında elde edilen aşı alım değerleri, geleneksel saha aşılamasına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Saha aşı uygulamaları birçok değişkeni içinde barındırmaktadır ve hayvanların aşı alım değerlerini optimum düzeyde tutmak sınırlı başarıya sahiptir. Bu çalışmada kuluçkahanede üniform yapıda konumlandırılmış hayvanların uygun doz ve teknik ile aşılanmaları neticesinde saha aşı uygulamalarına göre daha yüksek aşı alım oranlarına sahip olduğu saptandı.

Keywords

Sprey aşı, kuluçkahane aşılaması, enfeksiyöz bronşit, broyler aşılama yöntemi

References

[1] J. J. S. de Wit and J. K. A. Cook, ‘‘Spotlight on avian coronaviruses,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 313-316, 2020.
[2] M.A. Rohaim, R.F. El Naggar, M. M. Hamoud, A. I. Bazid, A. M. Gamal, S. E. Laban, M. A. Abdel-Sabour, S.A.E. Nasr, M.M. Zaki, M.Z. Shabbir, O.K. Zahran and M. Munir, ‘‘Emergence and genetic analysis of variant pathogenic 4/91 (serotype 793/B) infectious bronchitis virus in Egypt during 2019,’’ Virus Genes, vol. 55, no.5, pp. 720-725, 2019.
[3] I. Moharam, H. Sultan, K. Hassan, M. Ibrahim, S. Shany, A. A. Shehata, M. Abo-ElKhair, F. Pfaff, D. Höper, M. El Kady, M. Beer, T. Harder, H. Hafez and C. Grund, ‘‘Emerging infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in Egypt: Evidence for an evolutionary advantage of a new S1 variant with a unique gene 3ab constellation,’’ Infect Genet Evol, pp. 104433, 2020.
[4] J. Ignjatović and S. Sapats, ‘‘Avian infectious bronchitis virüs,’’Rev Sci Tech, vol.19, no. 2, pp. 493-508, 2000.
[5] I. I. Hasan, S. T. Rasheed, N. A. Jasim and M. K. Shakor, ‘‘Pathological effect of infectious bronchitis disease virus on broiler chicken trachea and kidney tissues,’’ Vet World, vol.13, no.10, pp. 2203-2208, 2020.
[6] A. Mueller Slay, M. Franca, M. Jackwood and B. Jordan, ‘‘Infection with IBV DMV/1639 at a young age leads to increased incidence of cystic oviduct formation associated with false layer syndrome,’’ Viruses, vol.14, no. 5), pp. 852, 2022.
[7] L. P. Colvero, L.Y. Villarreal, C. A. Torres and P. E. Brañdo, ‘‘Assessing the economic burden of avian infectious bronchitis on poultry farms in Brazil,’’ Rev Sci Tech, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 993-9, 2015.
[8] J. S. Guy, ‘‘Turkey coronavirus is more closely related to avian infectious bronchitis virus than to mammalian coronaviruses: a review,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 207-12, 2000.
[9] C. C. Loa, T. L. LinL, C. C. Wu, T. A. Bryan, T. A. Hooper and D. L. Schrader, ‘‘Differential detection of turkey coronavirus, infectious bronchitis virus, and bovine coronavirus by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction,’’ J Virol Methods, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 86-91, 2006.
[10] F. Awad, S. Hutton, A. Forrester, M. Baylis and K. Ganapathy, ‘‘Heterologous live infectious bronchitis virus vaccination in day-old commercial broiler chicks: clinical signs, ciliary health, immune responses and protection against variant infectious bronchitis viruses,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 169-77, 2016.

[11] J. J. De Wit, W. A. Swart and T. H. Fabri, ‘‘Efficacy of infectious bronchitis virus vaccinations in the field: association between the alpha-IBV IgM response, protection and vaccine application parameters,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 123-31, 2010.
[12] M. G. Matthijs, J. H. van Eck, J. J. de Wit, A. Bouma and J. A. Stegeman, ‘‘Effect of IBV-H120 vaccination in broilers on colibacillosis susceptibility after infection with a virulent Massachusetts-type IBV strain,’’ Avian Dis, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 540-5, 2005.
[13] M.W. Jackwood, ‘‘Review of infectious bronchitis virus around the world,’’ Avian Dis, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 634-41, 2012.
[14] L. Y. Villarreal, P.E. Brandão, J. L.Chacón, A. B. Saidenberg, M. S. Assayag, R. C. Jones and A. J. Ferreira, ‘‘Molecular characterization of infectious bronchitis virus strains isolated from the enteric contents of Brazilian laying hens and broilers,’’ Avian Dis, Dec; vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 974-8, 2007.
[15] J. Miłek and K. Blicharz-Domańska, ‘‘Coronaviruses in avian species - review with focus on epidemiology and diagnosis in wild birds,’’ J Vet Res, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 249-255, 2018.
[16] M. Smialek, B. Tykalowski, D. Dziewulska, T. Stenzel and A. Koncicki, ‘‘Immunological aspects of the efficiency of protectotype vaccination strategy against chicken infectious bronchitis,’’ BMC Vet Res, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 44, 2017.
[17] L. Kutle, L. Ljuma Skupnjak, A.Vrdoljak, D. Janković, G. J. Boelm, F. Kelemen, O. Zorman Rojs and J. Millecam, ‘‘Efficacy of infectious bronchitis GI-13 (793B) vaccine candidate tested according to the current European union requirements and for cross-protection against heterologous QX-like challenge,’’ Viral Immunol, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 555-564, 2020.
[18] M. Legnardi, G. Franzo, K. C. Koutoulis, M. Wiśniewski, E. Catelli, C. M. Tucciarone and M. Cecchinato, ‘‘Vaccine or field strains: the jigsaw pattern of infectious bronchitis virus molecular epidemiology in Poland, ’’ Poult Sci, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 6388-6392, 2019.
[19] M. Śmiałek, J. Kowalczyk and J. Koncicki, ‘‘A Influence of vaccination of broiler chickens against Escherichia coli with live attenuated vaccine on general properties of E. coli population, IBV vaccination efficiency, and production parameters-a field experiment,’’ Poult Sci, no. 11, pp. 5452-5460, 2020.
[20] M. Legnardi, H. Baranyay, C. Simon, J. Molnár, T. Bijlsma, M. Cecchinato, A. Gáspárdy, A. Bersényi, C. M. Tucciarone, G. Franzo and L. Kőrösi, ‘‘Infectious bronchitis hatchery vaccination: comparison between traditional spray administration and a newly developed gel delivery system in field conditions,’’ Vet Sci, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 145, 2021.
[21] S. S. Chandrasekar, B. Kingstad-Bakke, C.W. Wu, M. Suresh and A. M. Talaat, ‘‘A Novel mucosal adjuvant system for immunization against avian coronavirus causing infectious bronchitis, ’’ J Virol, vol. 94, no. 19, pp. e01016-20, 2020.
[22] S. P. Mondal and S. A. Naqi, ‘‘Maternal antibody to infectious bronchitis virus: its role in protection against infection and development of active immunity to vaccine,’’ Vet Immunol Immunopathol, vol. 79, no.2, pp. 31-40, 2001.
[23] C. F. Crouch CF, S. J. Andrews, R. G. Ward and M. J. Francis, ‘‘Protective efficacy of a live attenuated anti-coccidial vaccine administered to 1-day-old chickens,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 297-304, 2003.
[24] M. E. Sedeik, N. A. El-Shall, A. M. Awad, M. E. Abd El-Hack, A. N. Alowaimer and A. A. Swelum, ‘‘Comparative Evaluation of HVT-IBD Vector, Immune complex, and Live IBD vaccines against vvIBDV in commercial broiler chickens with high maternally derived antibodies,’’ Animals (Basel), Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 72, 2019.
[25] M. S. A. Bhuiyan, Z. Amin, A. M. S. A. Bakar, S. Saallah, N. H. M.Yusuf, S. M. Shaarani and S. Siddiquee, ‘‘Factor influences for diagnosis and vaccination of avian infectious bronchitis virus (Gammacoronavirus) in chickens,’’ Vet Sci, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 47, 2021.
[26] R. F. Gentry and M.O. Braune, ‘‘Prevention of virus inactivation during drinking water vaccination of poultry,’’ Poult Sci, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1450-6, 1972.
[27] T. H. Lim, H. N.Youn, S. S.Yuk, J. H. Kwon, W. T. Hong, G. B. Gwon, J. A. Lee, J. B. Lee, S. W. Lee and C. S. Song, ‘‘Successful cross-protective efficacy induced by heat-adapted live attenuated nephropathogenic infectious bronchitis virus derived from a natural recombinant strain,’’ Vaccine, vol. 33, no. 51, pp. 7370-7374, 2015.
[28] Y. Zhang, S. Huang, Y. Zeng, C. Xue and Y. Cao, ‘‘Rapid development and evaluation of a live-attenuated QX-like infectious bronchitis virus vaccine,’’ Vaccine, vol. 36, no. 29, pp. 4245-4254, 2018.
[29] M. Al-Rasheed, C. Ball and K. Ganapathy, ‘‘Route of infectious bronchitis virus vaccination determines the type and magnitude of immune responses in table egg laying hens,’’ Vet Res, vol. 52, no. 1, pp.139, 2021.
[30] F. Bande, S. S. Arshad, A. R. Omar, M. H. Bejo, M. S. Abubakar and Y. Abba, ‘‘Pathogenesis and diagnostic approaches of avian infectious bronchitis,’’ Adv Virol, pp. 4621659, 2016.
[31] F. Saiada, F. Eldemery, R. A. Zegpi, S. L. Gulley, A. Mishra, V. L. V. Santen and H. Toro, ‘‘Early vaccination of chickens induces suboptimal immunity against infectious bronchitis virus,’’ Avian Dis, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 38-47, 2019.
[32] R. Chhabra, A. Forrester, S. Lemiere, F. Awad, J. Chantrey and K. Ganapathy, ‘‘Mucosal, cellular, and humoral immune responses induced by different live infectious bronchitis virus vaccination regimes and protection conferred against infectious bronchitis virus Q1 strain,’’ Clin Vaccine Immunol, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1050-9, 2015.
[33] T. Al-Jallad, M. Kassouha, M. Salhab, A. Alomar, M. Al-Masalma and F. Abdelaziz, ‘‘Molecular characterization of isolated infectious bronchitis viruses from affected vaccinated broiler flocks in Syria,’’ BMC Vet Res, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 449, 2020.
[34] S. A. Callison, D. A Hilt, T.O. Boynton, B.F. Sample, R Robison, D.E. Swayne and M.W. Jackwood, ‘‘Development and evaluation of a real-time Taqman RT-PCR assay for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus from infected chickens,’’ J Virol Methods, vol.138, no. 2, pp. 60-5, 2006.
[35] S. A. Callison, D.A. Hilt, T.O. Boynton, B.F. Sample, R. Robison, D. E, Swayne and M. W. Jackwood, ‘‘Development and evaluation of a real-time Taqman RT-PCR assay for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus from infected chickens,’’ J Virol Methods, vol.138, no. 2, pp. 60-5, 2006.
[36] R. Meir, O. Maharat, Y. Farnushi and L. Simanov, ‘‘Development of a real-time TaqMan RT-PCR assay for the detection of infectious bronchitis virus in chickens, and comparison of RT-PCR and virus isolation,’’ J Virol Methods, vol.163, no. 2, pp.190-4, 2010.
[37] H. J. Roh, D.A. Hilt and M.W. Jackwood, ‘‘Detection of infectious bronchitis virus with the use of real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR and correlation with virus detection in embryonated eggs,’’Avian Dis, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 398-403, 2014.
[38] M.W. Jackwood, R. Clark, S. Cheng and B. J. Jordan, ‘‘Protection following simultaneous vaccination with three or four different attenuated live vaccine types against infectious bronchitis virüs, ’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 49, no. 4, pp.335-341, 2020.
[39] F. Awad, S. Hutton, A. Forrester and M. Baylis, K. Ganapathy, ‘‘Heterologous live infectious bronchitis virus vaccination in day-old commercial broiler chicks: clinical signs, ciliary health, immune responses and protection against variant infectious bronchitis viruses,’’ Avian Pathol, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 169-77, 2016.
[40] B. al-Tarcha and S. A. Sadoon, ‘‘Cross-protection studies with vaccine strain H-120 of infectious bronchitis virus using ciliary activity,’’ Acta Vet Hung, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 95-101, 1991.
[41] M. Jahantigh, S. Salari and M. Hedayati, ‘‘Detection of infectious bronchitis virus serotypes by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in broiler chickens,’’ Springerplus, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 36, 2013.
[42] Z. H. Bhuiyan, M. Z. Ali, M. M. Moula, M. Giasuddin, Z. U. M. Khan, ‘‘Prevalence and molecular characterization of infectious bronchitis virus isolated from chicken in Bangladesh,’’ Vet World, vol,12, no. 6, pp. 909-915, 2019.
[43] G. Franzo, C. J. Naylor, C. Lupini, M. Drigo, E. Catelli, V. Listorti, P. Pesente, D. Giovanardi, E. Morandini and M. Cecchinato, ‘‘Continued use of IBV 793B vaccine needs reassessment after its withdrawal led to the genotype's disappearance,’’ Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 50, pp. 6765-7, 2014.
[44] B. G. Tabachnick and S. F. Linda, Using Multivariate Statistics, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2015.
[45] J. Gelb Jr, B. S. Ladman, M. J. Licata, M. H. Shapiro and L. R. Campion, ‘‘Evaluating viral interference between infectious bronchitis virus and Newcastle disease virus vaccine strains using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction,’’Avian Dis, vol.51, no. 4, pp. 924-34, 2007.
[46] H. Ghobadian Diali, H. Hosseini, M.H. Fallah Mehrabadi and R. Yahyaraeyat, ‘‘Ghalyanchilangeroudi A Evaluation of viral load and transcriptome changes in tracheal tissue of two hybrids of commercial broiler chickens infected with avian infectious bronchitis virus: a comparative study,’’Arch Virol, vol.167, no.2, pp. 377-391, 2022.
[47] R. Ravikumar, J. Chan and M. Prabakaran, ‘‘Vaccines against Major Poultry Viral Diseases: Strategies to Improve the Breadth and Protective Efficacy,’’Viruses, vol.14, no.6, pp.1195, 2022.
[48] S. M. Ray, U. Ashash and S. Muthukumar, ‘‘A field study on the evaluation of day-of-hatch and in grow-out application of live infectious bursal disease virus vaccine in broiler chickens,’’Poult Sci, vol.100, no.8, pp.101252, 2021.
[49] P. Villegas , ‘‘Viral diseases of the respiratory system,’’ Poult Sci, vol.77, no.8, pp.1143-5, 1998.
[50] T. Okura, H. Otomo, S. Suzuki, Y. Ono, A.Taneno and E. Oishi, ‘‘Efficacy of a novel in ovo-attenuated live vaccine and recombinant vaccine against a very virulent infectious bursal disease virus in chickens,’’J Vet Med Sci, vol.83, no.11, pp.1686-1693, 2021.
[51] M.W. Jackwood, D.A, Hilt, A.W, McCall, C.N, Polizzi, E.T. McKinley and S.M. Williams, ‘‘Infectious bronchitis virus field vaccination coverage and persistence of Arkansas-type viruses in commercial broilers,’’ Avian Dis, vol.53, no.2, pp.175-83, 2009.
[52] H. Toro, V. L. van Santen, A. M. Ghetas and K. S. Joiner, ‘‘Cross-Protection by Infectious Bronchitis Viruses Under Controlled Experimental Conditions,’’ Avian Dis., vol.59, no.4, pp.532-6, 2015.
[53] Ö.Kardoğan, ‘‘Coronavirus and Infectious Bronchitis vaccines in chickens,’’ Etlik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg, vol.33, no.1, pp. 110-117, 2022.
[54] M.Akan, M.İzgür, B.Sarayeyüpoğlu, ‘‘Tavuklarda infeksiyöz bronşitisin polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (PZR) ve floresan antikor tekniği (FAT) ile teşhisi,’’ Ankara Ünv Vet Fak Derg, Vol.54, no:1, 47-54, 2007.
[55] N. Timurkaan, H.Öngör, H.Kalender, B.Karabulut, F. Çöven, A. Çevik, H. Eröksüz and B. Çetinkaya, ‘‘Pathological and molecular findings of visceral gout caused by Israel variant 2 (IS/1494/06) genotype of infectious bronchitis virus in chickens, ’’ Ankara Ünv Vet Fak Derg, vol.70 no:2,43-57, 2023.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kayhan Özkan ^*
0000-0002-5956-093X
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 31, 2023

Submission Date

August 25, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 7, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 11 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1167064

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA38NB45KE

APA

Özkan, K. (2023). Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 11(3), 1282-1295. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1167064

AMA

1.Özkan K. Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması. DUBİTED. 2023;11(3):1282-1295. doi:10.29130/dubited.1167064

Chicago

Özkan, Kayhan. 2023. “Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha Ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 11 (3): 1282-95. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1167064.

EndNote

Özkan K (July 1, 2023) Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 11 3 1282–1295.

IEEE

[1]K. Özkan, “Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması”, DUBİTED, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1282–1295, July 2023, doi: 10.29130/dubited.1167064.

ISNAD

Özkan, Kayhan. “Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha Ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 11/3 (July 1, 2023): 1282-1295. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1167064.

JAMA

1.Özkan K. Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması. DUBİTED. 2023;11:1282–1295.

MLA

Özkan, Kayhan. “Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha Ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, July 2023, pp. 1282-95, doi:10.29130/dubited.1167064.

Vancouver

1.Kayhan Özkan. Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması. DUBİTED. 2023 Jul. 1;11(3):1282-95. doi:10.29130/dubited.1167064

Comparison of Field and Hatchery Practices in Spray Vaccination Against Infectious Bronchitis

Abstract

Keywords

Enfeksiyöz Bronşite Karşı Sprey Aşılamada Saha ve Kuluçkahane Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite