Beden Eğitimi Dersi Öğretim Programında Yer Alan Sağlıkla İlişkili Kazanımlara Ulaşılamama Nedenlerinin Sosyo-Ekolojik Model Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi

Öz

Türkiye’de mevcut beden eğitimi ve spor dersi öğretim programında yer alan sağlıkla ilişkili kazanımlara öğrencilerin yeterli düzeyde ulaşamadığı bilinmektedir. Bu sorundan hareketle çalışmanın amacı, programda yer alan sağlık kazanımlarına ulaşamadığını belirten öğrencilerin sağlık kazanımlarına neden ulaşamadıklarının Sosyo-Ekolojik Model çerçevesinde incelenmesidir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması deseni kullanılmış, katılımcılar amaçlı örneklem yöntemlerinden olan ölçüt örnekleme tekniği ile belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen ölçütlere uyan 12 öğrenci ile üç farklı odak grup görüşmesi yapılmış ve tematik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak veriler analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, Beden eğitimi ve spor dersi öğretim Programı’nda yer alan 7. sınıf sağlık kazanımlarını elde edemeyen öğrencilerin 1) Bireysel olarak sağlıkla ilgili bilgi, istek ve farkındalıklarının az olduğu; 2) Sosyal olarak akran baskısı gördükleri, aile desteğine sahip olmadıkları; 3) Fiziki çevreyle ilgili olarak sağlık kazanımlarını elde edebilecekleri tek ortamın okul olduğu ama okulda fiziksel aktiviteye katılım için altyapının yetersiz olduğu; 4) Politik nedenler bağlamında sağlık kazanımlarını elde etmek için yeterli zaman bulamadıkları ve teorik derslerinin çok yoğun olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Öğrencilerin sağlık kazanımlarını kazabilmeleri için öğrencilerin sağlık ve fiziksel aktivite ile ilgili farkındalıklarının artırılması, akran ve aile desteğinin artırılması, okulların fiziki yapısının iyileştirilmesi ve öğrencilerin fiziksel aktiviteye katılabilecekleri politikaların geliştirilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Beden Eğitimi
• Sağlık
• Ders Kazanımları
• Sosyo-Ekolojik Model

Examination of The Reasons For Not Achieving The Health-Related Outcomes In The Physical Education Curriculum Within The Framework of Socio-Ecological Model

Öz

It is known that students cannot reach the health-related outcomes in the current physical education and sports curriculum in Turkey at an adequate level. Based on this problem, the aim of this study is to examine the reasons why the students who stated that they could not reach the health outcomes in the programme could not reach the health outcomes from the perspective of the students within the framework of the Socio-Ecological Model. In this study, case study design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used and the sample group was reached by purposeful sampling method. Three different focus group interviews were conducted with 12 students and analysed using thematic analysis method. According to the findings, it was found that the students who could not achieve the 7th grade health outcomes in the Physical Education and Sports Course Programme 1) Individually, Students had little knowledge, desire and awareness about health; 2) Socially, they experience peer pressure and do not have family support; 3) Regarding the physical environment, it was concluded that the only environment where they can achieve health gains is school, but the infrastructure for participation in physical activity is inadequate at school; 4) In the context of political reasons, it was concluded that they could not find enough time to achieve health gains and their theoretical courses were too intense. In order for students to gain health outcomes, it is recommended to increase students' awareness about health and physical activity, increase peer and family support, improve the physical structure of schools and develop policies that students can participate in physical activity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Physical education
• Health
• Lesson outcomes
• Socio-ecological model

Destekleyen Kurum

This research received no external funding.

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was obtained for this study from the Ethics Committee of Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University (Date: May 23, 2023; Decision Number: 78; Protocol No: E-70400699-000-2300160224).

Teşekkür

The authors do not wish to thank any individual or institution.

Kaynakça

1. Altunbakır, S., & Pehlevan, Z. (2020). Evaluation of cognitive field outcomes of secondary school physical education lesson teaching program: Mersin example. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Studies, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30655/besad.2020.23
2. Altuntaş, Ç. (2019). Physical education and sport cours of secondary school students opinions (Publication No. 542688) [Master's thesis, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
3. Alves, R. F. (2024). The relationship between health-related knowledge and attitudes and health risk behaviours among Portuguese university students. Global Health Promotion, 31(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759231195561
4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
5. Canbaz, B., & Koca Arıtan, C. (2020). The analysis of physical activity experiences of syrian refugee women in Ankara with socio-ecological model and gender perspective. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(3), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.722755
6. Carl, J., Barratt, J., Wanner, P., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., & Pfeifer, K. (2022). The effectiveness of physical literacy interventions: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 52(12), 2965–2999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01738-4
7. Cengiz, C., & Ince, M. L. (2014). Impact of social-ecologic intervention on physical activity knowledge and behaviors of rural students. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 11(8), 1565–1572. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2013-0080
8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

9. Dalaman, O., & Korkmaz, İ. (2010). The perceptions of elementary and physical education teachers about acquiring objectıves of physical education. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 172–185. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bsd/article/713901
10. Ennis, C. D. (2007). 2006 C.H. McCloy research lecture: Defining learning as conceptual change in physical education and physical activity settings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(3), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599411
11. Erdoğdu, M., & Öçalan, M. (2010). The opinions of physical education teachers on evaluating the second level primary school physical education lesson program. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000190
12. Franco, E., & Coterón, J. (2017). The effects of a physical education intervention to support the satisfaction of basic psychological needs on the motivation and intentions to be physically active. Journal of Human Kinetics, 59(1), 5–15.
13. Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson.
14. Gülüm, V., & Bilir, P. (2011). Opinious of physical education teachers, physical education curricula programs related to the conditions of applicability. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000200
15. Hünük, D., Özdemir, R. A., Yıldırım, G., & Aşçı, H. (2013). The role of perceived social support on physical activity participation of 6th to 8th grade students. Education and Science, 38(170), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.15390/ES.2013.1183
16. Işıkgöz, M. E. (2021). Analysis on the acquisitions of secondary school physical education and sports lesson curriculum in terms of the 21st century skills. Artuklu İnsan ve Toplum Bilim Dergisi, 1(6), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.46628/itbhssj.912031
17. Kalemkuş, J. (2021). Investigation of science curriculum learning outcomes in terms of 21st century skills. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.800552
18. Khokhar, S., Pathan, H., Raheem, A., & Abbasi, A. M. (2020). Theory development in thematic analysis: Procedure and practice. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v3i3.79
19. King, K. A., Tergerson, J. L., & Wilson, B. R. (2008). Effect of social support on adolescents’ perceptions of and engagement in physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(3), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.5.3.374
20. Lawson, H. A. (2018). Redesigning physical education: An equity agenda in which every child matters. Routledge.
21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
22. Mendonça, G., & de Farias Júnior, J. C. (2015). Physical activity and social support in adolescents: Analysis of different types and sources of social support. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(18), 1942–1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1020842
23. Metzler, M. W., McKenzie, T. L., van der Mars, H., Barrett-Williams, S. L., & Ellis, R. (2013). Health optimizing physical education (HOPE): A new curriculum for school programs—Part 1: Establishing the need and describing the model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(4), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2013.773826
24. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2006). İlköğretim beden eğitimi dersi öğretim programı (1–8. sınıflar) [Primary education physical education curriculum (Grades 1–8)].
25. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2010). Ortaöğretim beden eğitimi ve spor dersi öğretim programı [Secondary physical education and sports curriculum].
26. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2018). Beden eğitimi ve spor dersi öğretim programı [Physical education and sports course curriculum]. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=324
27. Pehlevan, Z., Temel, C., & Kangalgil, M. (2019). Opinions of the graduated students on the learning outcomes of secondary school physical education curriculum. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(3), 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2948
28. Sallis, J. F., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
29. Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Alcaraz, J. E., Kolody, B., Faucette, N., & Hovell, M. F. (1997). The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students: Sports, play and active recreation for kids. American Journal of Public Health, 87(8), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.8.1328
30. Sandelowski, M. (2002). Reembodying qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001008
31. Sevil-Serrano, J., Aibar, A., Abós, Á., Generelo, E., & García-González, L. (2022). Improving motivation for physical activity and physical education through a school-based intervention. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(2), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1764466
32. Siedentop, D. L. (2009). National plan for physical activity: Education sector. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6(Suppl. 2), S168–S180. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.6.s2.s168
33. Slagle, M., Brown, H., & Egan, C. (2022). Increasing physical education and physical activity time in school: Strategies that worked. Strategies, 35(6), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2120140
34. Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. Routledge.
35. Speziale, H. S., Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
36. Terrón-Pérez, M., Molina-García, J., Martínez-Bello, V. E., & Queralt, A. (2021). Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity levels in preschool children: A systematic review. Current Environmental Health Reports, 8(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00318-4
37. Uğraş, S., Güllü, M., & Yücekaya, M. A. (2019). My first year of physical education and sport teaching. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.11m
38. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/272722
39. World Obesity Federation. (2022, May). One billion people globally estimated to be living with obesity by 2030. https://www.worldobesity.org/news/one-billion-people-globally-estimated-to-be-living-with-obesity-by-2030
40. Yılmaz, E. B. (2020). Examination of physical education teachers' health-related fitness knowledge on their use in the class: From the perspective of teachers and their students (Publication No. 605738) [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
41. Yılmaz, E. B., & Hünük, D. (2018, September 26–28). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin sağlıkla ilgili fiziksel uygunluk bilgilerinin ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Paper presentation]. 13th FIEP European Congress and 29th FIEP World Congress, Istanbul, Turkey. ‬ Yılmaz, E. B., & Hünük, D. (2023). Constructing health and physical activity knowledge in practice: Teachers’ and students’ experiences. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0250
42. Yıldız, R. (2019). Views of physical education and sports teachers on primary education second stage physical education and sports course achievements (Internal Anatolia region example) (Publication No. 542688) [Master’s thesis, Cumhuriyet University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
43. Yıldız, R., & Kangalgil, M. (2021). Views of physical education and sports teachers on primary education second stage physical education and sports course achievements. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(40), 2146–2167. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.856590