PUBLIC OPINION FORMATION AND ELECTIONS: A NETWORK ANALYSIS ON 24th JUNE 2018 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND 27th TERM GENERAL ELECTION

Öz

In Turkey's political history, elections which are undoubtedly the most important element of the democracy has often been controversial. Turkey has also adopted a national multiparty presidential system with Constitutional Amendment made in April 2017. While discussions of the referendum are ongoing, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Chairman Devlet Bahçeli, one of the opposition leaders and the political parties supporting the system, has made an early election call, despite the expected 2019 to move to the related system. Following the negotiations, it was decided to go to the early elections on 24th June, 2018. It is wondered that as a citizenship task, how the voters' behavior will evolve. Because, great importance is given to the activities of forming public opinion before the elections, and public opinion surveys can also manipulate the voters while keeping their pulse. However, today the situation of the public network formed in social networks which are based on new media, is also important. 

Therefore, in this study, public opinion formation, public opinion polls and the public network which is formed on social media for related election will be analyzed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Voter,Elections,Public Opinion Formation,Public Opinion Polls,Public Network

KAMUOYU OLUŞUMU VE SEÇİMLER: 24 HAZİRAN 2018 CUMHURBAŞKANI SEÇİMİ VE 27. DÖNEM MİLLETVEKİLİ GENEL SEÇİMİ ÜZERİNE BİR AĞ ANALİZİ

Öz

Demokrasinin kuşkusuz en önemli unsuru olan seçimler, Türkiye siyasi tarihinde de genellikle tartışmalı olmuştur.Türkiye, 2017 yılı Nisan ayında yapılan Anayasa Değişikliği ile cumhurbaşkanlığı sistemine geçmiştir. İlgili referandumun tartışmaları sürerken, kamuoyunca kabulü oylanan partili cumhurbaşkanlığına geçmek için 2019 yılı beklenmesine karşın, muhalefet liderlerinden olan ve ilgili sistemi destekleyen siyasi partilerden Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi (MHP) Genel Başkanı Devlet Bahçeli erken seçim çağrısı yapmıştır. Yapılan görüşmelerin ardından ülkenin 24 Haziran 2018 tarihinde erken seçime gitmesi kararlaştırılmıştır. Seçmen için bir yurttaşlık görevi olan seçmen davranışının nasıl seyredeceği ise merak konusudur. Çünkü seçimler öncesi kamuoyu oluşturma faaliyetlerine büyük önem atfedilmekte, kamuoyu araştırmaları seçmenin nabzını tutarken, yönlendirme de yapabilmektedir. Bununla birlikte bugün yeni medya tabanlı sosyal ağlarda oluşan kamuoyu ağının durumu da önemlidir. Bu yüzden bu çalışmada, kamuoyu oluşumu ve kamuoyu araştırmaları ileilgili seçim özelinde sosyal medyada oluşan kamuoyu ağı analiz edilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Seçmen,Seçimler,Kamuoyu Oluşumu,Kamuoyu Araştırmaları,Kamuoyu Ağı

Kaynakça

1. AJANS HABER; (2018). “En güncel seçim anketi Mediar tarafından açıklandı”, https://www.ajanshaber.com/en-guncel-secim-anketi-mediar-tarafindan-aciklandi-haberi/424630, Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2018.
2. ANSTEAD, N. ve O’LOUGHLIN, B. (2012). Semantic Polling The Ethics of Online Public Opinion, media policy brief 5, May 2012, LSE Media Policy Project.
3. ASHWORTH, S.; BUENO DE MESQUITA, E. ve FRİEDENBERG, A. (2016). Accountability and Information in Elections, The research was supported by NSF grants SES-0819152 (Bueno de Mesquita) and SES-0819200 (Friedenberg).
4. ATABEK, N. (2002). “Kamuoyu, Medya ve Demokrasi”, Kurgu Dergisi. 19, s.223-238.
5. AYDIN. B. O. (2018). “Kamuoyu Araştırmalarına Güven”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17 (2), s.429-437.
6. BERINSKY, A. (1999). “The Two Faces of Public Opinion”, American Journal of Political Science, 43 (4), p.1209–1230.
7. BORICK, P. C.; LACHAPELLE, E. ve RABE, G. B. (2011). Climate Compared: Public Opinion on Climate Change in the United States and Canada, Recent Issues in Governance Studies.
8. CHUNG, S. ve LEE, S. (2016). “Crisis Communication Strategy on Social Media and the Public’s Cognitive and Affective Responses: A Case of Foster Farms Salmonella Outbreak”, Communication Research Reports, 33(4), p.341–348.

9. COLLIER, P. ve HOEFFLER, A. (2009). Democracy’s Achilles Heel or, How to Win an Election without Really Trying, CSAE WPS/2009-08, Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics, Oxford.
10. DONSBACH, W. (2014). Public Opinion Polls, In: Gianpietro Mazzoleni (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Malden et al: Wiley (in preparation).
11. DRUCKMAN, J. (2013). Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness, Institute for Policy Research Northwestern University, Working Paper Series, WP-13-21.
12. SISK, D. T. (2017). Elections, Electoral Systems and Party Systems, Elections, Electoral Systems and Party Systems A Resource Guide, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, www.idea.int.
13. EUROPEAN COMISSION; (2015). “Standard Eurobarometer 83”, Spring 2015, Public Opinion in The European Union, First Results, Fieldwork: May 2015, Publication: July 2015, This survey has been requested and co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.
14. GILENS, M. (1999). Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, University of Chicago Press.
15. GANDY, H. O. (2003). “Public Opinion Surveys and the Formation of Privacy Policy”, Journal of Social Issues, 59 (2), p.283-299.
16. GOLDSMITH, E. B. and HORIUCHI, Y. (2009). In Search of Soft Power: Does Foreign Public Opinion Matter for U.S. Foreign Policy?, Crawford School Research Paper No 8.
17. GÜZ, N. (2005). Haberde Yönlendirme ve Kamuoyu Araştırmaları, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık: Ankara.
18. GÜZ, N., YANIK, H., YEGEN, C., KILIÇ, I. Ö., ve BİNGÖL, M. (2017). “Kamuoyu Araştırmaları ve Medyaya Güven”, International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Communication and Humanities Researches, 16 (0), s.1-20.
19. HANSEN, D. L., SCHNEIDERMAN, B., ve SMITH, M. A. (2011). Analyzing Social Media Networks With Nodexl: İnsights From A Connected World, Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
20. HAYES, D. ve GUARDINO, M. (2011). “The Influence of Foreign Voices on U.S. Public Opinion”, American Journal of Political Science, 55 (4), p.830-850.
21. HOFFMAN, L. A. (2005). “Political Parties, Electoral Systems And Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis”, European Journal of Political Research, 44: p.231-242.
22. HTUN, M. VE POWELL, JR. B. G. (2013). Between Science and Engineering: Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance, pp. 1-13, in Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance, Edited by Mala Htun and G. Bingham Powell, Jr., American Political Science Association Task Force Report.
23. HÜRRİYET; (2018). CHP'li İlhan Cihaner'den 20 vekil çıkışı! Dikkat çeken tweet, Son dakika: YSK, İYİ Parti kararını verdi, Son dakika... Bir parti daha seçimlere katılacak, YSK Başkanı tüm partilere bu çağrıyı yaptı, Bağımsız Türkiye Partisi seçimlere katılmama kararı aldı, URL: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/chpli-ilhan-cihanerden-20-vekil-cikisi-dikkat-ceken-tweet-40813448, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-bir-parti-daha-secimlere-katilacak-40816904, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-ysk-iyi-parti-kararini-verdi-40813574, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ysk-baskani-tum-partilere-bu-cagriyi-yapti-40821072, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/bagimsiz-turkiye-partisi-secimlere-katilmama-karari-aldi-40843890, 21.04.2018; 22.04.2018; 25.04.2018; 30.04.2018; 21.05.2018.
24. INDİGO DERGİSİ; (2018). 24 Haziran seçim sonuçları ne olur? İşte son seçim anketleri!, URL: https://indigodergisi.com/2018/04/24-haziran-secim-sonuclari-secim-anketleri/, Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2018.
25. KAMU AJANS; (2018). Cumhurbaşkanlığı Genel Seçiminde Anketlerde Hangi Parti ve Aday Önde? MAK Kesin Sonuçları Açıkladı, URL: http://www.kamuajans.com/kultur-sanat/cumhurbaskanligi-genel-seciminde-anketlerde-hangi-parti-ve-aday-onde-mak-kesin-sonuclari-acikladi-h523679.html, Erişim Tarihi: 22.05.2018.
26. KAZIN, M. (2011). (Ed). The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History, Associate Editors: Rebecca Edwards & Adam Rothman, Princeton University Press.
27. KOZAK, M. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma: Tasarım, Yazım ve Yayım Teknikleri, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
28. KUHNE, W. (2010). The Role of Elections in Emerging Democracies and Post-Conflict Countries Key Issues, Lessons Learned and Dilemmas, International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
29. LAKE, C. C. VE HARPER, C. P. (2002). Kamuoyu Araştırmaları, Çev. Nurettin Güz, Ankara: Altınküre Yayınları.
30. LAX, R. J. VE PHILLIPS, H. J. (2009). “How ShouldWe Estimate Public Opinion in The States?”, American Journal of Political Science, 53 (1), p.107-121.
31. LEEPER, J. T. VE SLOTHUUS, R. (2014). “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation”, Advances in Political Psychology, Vol. 35, Suppl. 1.
32. MC DONNELL, I. VE WEGIMONT, L. (2002). Public Opinion Research, Global Education and Development Co-operation Reform: In Search of a Virtuous Circle, Europe-Wide Global Education Congress, Maastricht, November 15th-17th 2002, Achieving the Millennium Goals, Learning for Sustainability: increased commitment to global education for increased critical public support, Plenary session 4.
33. MEHRTENS, F. J. (2004). “Three Worlds of Public Opinion? Values, Variations, and the Effect on Social Policy”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16 (2), 115-143.
34. MESFIN, F. (2008). Democracy, elections & political parties A conceptual overview with special emphasis on Africa, ISS Paper 166.
35. MITCHELL, B. VE ROBERTS, V. J. (2010). Public Opinion and Sentencing for Murder an Empirical Investigation of Public Knowledge and Attitudes in England and Wales, Report for the Nuffield Foundation.
36. MOY, P. VE BOSCH, B. (2013). Theories of Public Opinion, Sociology Department, Faculty Publications, 244.
37. ÖZDEMİRCİ, F. (1990). “Niçin Az Okuyoruz” Kamuoyu Araştırması Sonuçlandı, Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 4 (3), p.154-155.
38. POLITICAL OPINION POLLS, NO. 1 (2009). Social Science & Politics Research Team, Parliamentary Affairs Team, February 2009, Library & Research Service Central Enquiry Desk: 618-4701.
39. PRYKE, S. (2012). Social Network Analysis in Construction, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley.
40. ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. (2005). From Elections to Democracy in Central Europe: Public Participation and the Role of Civil Society, Prepared for the Club of Madrid IV General Assembly, Prague, Czech Republic, 10-12, November 2005, Revised 12 December 2005.
41. SABAH; (2018). 24 Haziran seçimleri için son kamuoyu araştırması A Haber'de açıklandı, URL: https://www.sabah.com.tr/webtv/haber/24-haziran-secimleri-icin-son-kamuoyu-arastirmasi-a-haberde-aciklandi, 22.05.2018.
42. SALING, K. (2013). Social Network Analysis. R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of Public Relations (2nd edition, ss. 849–850). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
43. SNIDERMAN, M. P. VE BULLOCK, J. (2004). A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice: The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence, in Studies in Public Opinion Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, Ed. Saris, E. W. & Sniderman, M. P., pp. 337-335, Princeton University Press.
44. SCHEVE, K. VE TOMZ, M. (1999). Electoral Surprise and the Midterm Loss in US Congressional Elections, B.J.Pol.S. 29, p.507-521, Cambridge University Press, Printed in the U.K.
45. SONCK, N. VE LOOSVELDT, G. (2007). Media, Polling and Public Opinion - Making News Based on Public Opinion Polls: the Flemish Case, Paper to be presented at the 60th Annual WAPOR Conference “Public Opinion and the Challenges of the 21st Century” in Berlin.
46. SPUTNIK NEWS; (2018). SONAR'dan seçim anketi: AK Parti-MHP ittifakı yüzde 47, URL: https://tr.sputniknews.com/turkiye/201804261033186570-sonar-anketi-akparti-mhp-oylar-hdp-iyi-parti-sp/, Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2018.
47. SURO, R. (2009). America’s Views of Immigration: The Evidence from Public Opinion Surveys, The Migration Policy Institute, Washington.
48. TAKVİM; (2018). Adil Gür’den Son Kamuoyu Yoklaması, URL: https://www.takvim.com.tr/guncel/2018/03/08/adil-gurden-son-kamuoyu-yoklamasi, 08.03.2018.
49. TEMİZEL, H. (2008). “Kamuoyu Kuramları ve Kamuoyu Oluşumunda Kitle İletişim Araçları”, SÜ İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, p.127-146.
50. T 24; (2018). YSK açıkladı; cumhurbaşkanı adaylığı için 4 ismin 100 bin imza yarışı başladı, http://t24.com.tr/haber/ysk-acikladi-cumhurbaskani-adayligi-icin-4-ismin-100-bin-imza-yarisi-basladi,620193, Erişim Tarihi: 03.05.2018.
51. VERGNE. C. (2006). Democracy, Elections and Allocation of Public Expenditure in Developing Countries.
52. VOSS, S.; GELMAN, A. ve KING, G. (1995). “The Polls-A Revıew Preelectıon Survey Methodology: Detaıls From Eıght Pollıng Organızatıons, 1988 And 1992”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 59: p.98-132.
53. WEISSBERG, R. (2001). Why Policymakers Should Ignore Public Opinion Polls, Policy Analysis, No. 402.
54. What are opinion polls? MRS guidance on how to read opinion polls. (2016). MRS Evidence Matters, https://www.mrs.org.uk/pdf/How%20to%20read%20opinion%20polls%20guidance%20DRAFT%20FOR%20CONSULTATION.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 25.04.2018.
55. YENİ ASYA; (2018). Seçime katılacak siyasi parti sayısı 8'e indi, URL: http://www.yeniasya.com.tr/politika/secime-katilacak-siyasi-parti-sayisi-8-e-indi_462523, Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2018.
56. YENİ ŞAFAK; (2018). Türkiye Genel Seçim Tarihi, URL: https://www.yenisafak.com/secim/genel-secim/, Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2018.
57. YÜKSEL, E. (2007). “Kamuoyu Oluşturma” ve “Gündem Belirleme” Kavramları Nerede Kesişmekte, Nerede Ayrılmaktadır?, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, p. 571-586.