BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2009, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 231 - 250, 01.02.2009

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Agarwal, B. (1997): “Bargaining and Gender Relations”, Feminist Economics, 3(1): 1-51
  • Agarwal, B. (1994): “Gender and Command Over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis and Policy in South Asia”, World Development, 22: 1455-78
  • Champernowne, D. and Cowell, F. (1998): Economic Inequality and Income Distribution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Dayioglu, M. (2000): “Labor Market Participation of Women in Turkey”, in F. Acar and Günes-Ayata (eds.) Gender and Identity Construction: Women of Central Asia, Caucasus and Turkey, The Netherlands: E.S. Brill
  • Dijkstra, G. and Hanmer, L. (2000): “Measuring Socio-Economic Gender Inequality: Toward an Alternative to the UNDP Gender Related Development Index”, Feminist Economics, 6 (2): 41-75
  • Durbin, E. (1999): “Towards a Gendered Human Poverty Measure”, Feminist Economics, 5: 105-8
  • Folbre, N. (2001): The Invisible Heart: Economic and Family Values, New York, The New York Press
  • Jackson, C. (1996): “Rescuing Gender From the Poverty Trap”, World Development, 24: 489-504
  • Jackson, C. and Palmer-Jones, R. (1999): “Rethinking Gendered Poverty and Work”, Development and Change, 30: 557-83
  • Jill, R., Smith, M. and Fagan, C. (1999): Women’s Employment in Europe: Trends and Prospects, London, Routledge
  • Kabeer, N. (1999): “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment”, Development and Change, 30: 435- 64
  • Kasnakoglu, Z. and M. Dayioglu (1996): “Education and the Labor Market Participation of Women in Turkey”, in T. Bulutay (ed.) Education and the Labor Market in Turkey, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics.
  • Klasen, S. (1999): Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-Country Regressions, Washington, World Bank
  • Knowles, S. Lorgelly, P. and Owen, D. (2002): “Are Educational Gender Gaps a Brake on Economic Development? Some Cross Country Emprical Evidence”, Oxford Economic Papers, 54: 118-149
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000): Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Saith, R. and Harris-White, B. (1999): “The Gender Sensitivity of Well-being Indicators”, Development and Change, 30: 465-97
  • Razavi, S. (1999): “Gendered Poverty and Well-being: Introduction”, Development and Change, 30: 409-33
  • Sen, A. and Anand, S. (2000): “Human development and Economic Sustainability”, World Development, 28: 2029-49
  • Sen, G. (1999): “Engendering Poverty Alleviation: Challenges and Opportunities”, Development and Change, 30: 685-92
  • State Planning Organization and United Nations Development Programme (2005): Turkey Millennium Development Goals Report, SPO, Ankara
  • Tansel, A. (1996): “Self-Employment, Wage Employment and Returns to Education for Urban Men and Women in Turkey” in T. Bulutay (ed.) Education and the Labor Market in Turkey, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Publication.
  • TUSIAD (2000): The Walk towards the Equality of Women and Men, Istanbul: TUSIAD.
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2008): Who Answers to Women, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2007): The Annual Report 2007- 2008, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2006): The Annual Report 2005- 2006, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2005): The Annual Report 2004- 2005, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2004): The Annual Report 2003- 2004, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2003): The Annual Report 2002- 2003, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2000): Progress of World’s Women, New York, UNIFEM.
  • United Nations Development Programme (2008): Human Development Report, Turkey, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2007): Human Development Report 2007-2008, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2006): Human Development Report: Beyond Scarcity: Power, Povery and the Global Water Crises, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2005): Human Development Report: International Cooperation at a crossroads, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2004): Human Development Report: Cultural Liberty in Today‘s Diverse World, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2003): Human Development Report: Millenium Development Goals, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2002): Human Development Report: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2001): Human Development Report: Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2000): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1999): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1998): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1997): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1996): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1995): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • World Bank (2005): “Turkey Education Sector Study: Sustainable Pathways to an Effective,Equitable, and Efficient Education System for Preschool through Secondary School Education” Human Development Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region in association with Education Reform Initiative/ Istanbul Policy Center, 2005
  • World Bank (2001): Engendering Development Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources and Voice, New York, World Bank

THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 231 - 250, 01.02.2009

Öz

The objective of this paper is to compare the human and gender-related development indices’ results of the twelve members of the European Union to Turkey’s results. Besides, this study is to recommend some policies to the countries above to improve human development at the conclusion if necessary. The contribution of this paper to the existing literature is to present a comparative perspective to the readers about the reflection of the human and gender development between the selected countries of the European Union and Turkey

Kaynakça

  • Agarwal, B. (1997): “Bargaining and Gender Relations”, Feminist Economics, 3(1): 1-51
  • Agarwal, B. (1994): “Gender and Command Over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis and Policy in South Asia”, World Development, 22: 1455-78
  • Champernowne, D. and Cowell, F. (1998): Economic Inequality and Income Distribution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Dayioglu, M. (2000): “Labor Market Participation of Women in Turkey”, in F. Acar and Günes-Ayata (eds.) Gender and Identity Construction: Women of Central Asia, Caucasus and Turkey, The Netherlands: E.S. Brill
  • Dijkstra, G. and Hanmer, L. (2000): “Measuring Socio-Economic Gender Inequality: Toward an Alternative to the UNDP Gender Related Development Index”, Feminist Economics, 6 (2): 41-75
  • Durbin, E. (1999): “Towards a Gendered Human Poverty Measure”, Feminist Economics, 5: 105-8
  • Folbre, N. (2001): The Invisible Heart: Economic and Family Values, New York, The New York Press
  • Jackson, C. (1996): “Rescuing Gender From the Poverty Trap”, World Development, 24: 489-504
  • Jackson, C. and Palmer-Jones, R. (1999): “Rethinking Gendered Poverty and Work”, Development and Change, 30: 557-83
  • Jill, R., Smith, M. and Fagan, C. (1999): Women’s Employment in Europe: Trends and Prospects, London, Routledge
  • Kabeer, N. (1999): “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment”, Development and Change, 30: 435- 64
  • Kasnakoglu, Z. and M. Dayioglu (1996): “Education and the Labor Market Participation of Women in Turkey”, in T. Bulutay (ed.) Education and the Labor Market in Turkey, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics.
  • Klasen, S. (1999): Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-Country Regressions, Washington, World Bank
  • Knowles, S. Lorgelly, P. and Owen, D. (2002): “Are Educational Gender Gaps a Brake on Economic Development? Some Cross Country Emprical Evidence”, Oxford Economic Papers, 54: 118-149
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000): Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  • Saith, R. and Harris-White, B. (1999): “The Gender Sensitivity of Well-being Indicators”, Development and Change, 30: 465-97
  • Razavi, S. (1999): “Gendered Poverty and Well-being: Introduction”, Development and Change, 30: 409-33
  • Sen, A. and Anand, S. (2000): “Human development and Economic Sustainability”, World Development, 28: 2029-49
  • Sen, G. (1999): “Engendering Poverty Alleviation: Challenges and Opportunities”, Development and Change, 30: 685-92
  • State Planning Organization and United Nations Development Programme (2005): Turkey Millennium Development Goals Report, SPO, Ankara
  • Tansel, A. (1996): “Self-Employment, Wage Employment and Returns to Education for Urban Men and Women in Turkey” in T. Bulutay (ed.) Education and the Labor Market in Turkey, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Publication.
  • TUSIAD (2000): The Walk towards the Equality of Women and Men, Istanbul: TUSIAD.
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2008): Who Answers to Women, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2007): The Annual Report 2007- 2008, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2006): The Annual Report 2005- 2006, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2005): The Annual Report 2004- 2005, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2004): The Annual Report 2003- 2004, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2003): The Annual Report 2002- 2003, New York, UNIFEM
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2000): Progress of World’s Women, New York, UNIFEM.
  • United Nations Development Programme (2008): Human Development Report, Turkey, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2007): Human Development Report 2007-2008, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2006): Human Development Report: Beyond Scarcity: Power, Povery and the Global Water Crises, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2005): Human Development Report: International Cooperation at a crossroads, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2004): Human Development Report: Cultural Liberty in Today‘s Diverse World, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2003): Human Development Report: Millenium Development Goals, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2002): Human Development Report: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2001): Human Development Report: Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (2000): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1999): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1998): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1997): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1996): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • United Nations Development Programme (1995): Human Development Report, New York, United Nations
  • World Bank (2005): “Turkey Education Sector Study: Sustainable Pathways to an Effective,Equitable, and Efficient Education System for Preschool through Secondary School Education” Human Development Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region in association with Education Reform Initiative/ Istanbul Policy Center, 2005
  • World Bank (2001): Engendering Development Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources and Voice, New York, World Bank
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA95DB66ZJ
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Mehmet Ufuk Tutan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2009
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Tutan, M. U. (2009). THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY. Ege Academic Review, 9(1), 231-250.
AMA Tutan MU. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY. eab. Şubat 2009;9(1):231-250.
Chicago Tutan, Mehmet Ufuk. “THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY”. Ege Academic Review 9, sy. 1 (Şubat 2009): 231-50.
EndNote Tutan MU (01 Şubat 2009) THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY. Ege Academic Review 9 1 231–250.
IEEE M. U. Tutan, “THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY”, eab, c. 9, sy. 1, ss. 231–250, 2009.
ISNAD Tutan, Mehmet Ufuk. “THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY”. Ege Academic Review 9/1 (Şubat 2009), 231-250.
JAMA Tutan MU. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY. eab. 2009;9:231–250.
MLA Tutan, Mehmet Ufuk. “THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY”. Ege Academic Review, c. 9, sy. 1, 2009, ss. 231-50.
Vancouver Tutan MU. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE TWELVE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY. eab. 2009;9(1):231-50.