THE EFFECT OF THE ECONOMIC CYCLE ON WORKPLACE ACCIDENTS IN SIX EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 1 - 13, 01.02.2010

Anna Maria Mouza Antonis Targoutzıdıs

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of the economic cycle on workplace accidents. In particular, the effect of some major factors of the economic cycle (unemployment, output per capita and unit labor cost) on fatal and non-fatal injuries is examined in six European countries (Finland, Italy, France, Switzerland, Austria and Germany). Correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis are applied, considering relevant data of the selected countries, over the period 1990-2005. The analysis indicates a counter-cyclical behavior of workplace accidents. Output per capita is the only parameter whose impact is statistically significant in all cases. The different effect of the examined factors on workplace accidents and the inter-relations between these factors indicate that an economic model of the workplace is required, if the impact of the economic cycle on workplace accidents is to be studied thoroughly

Keywords

Economic cycle, Workplace accidents, Unemployment, GDP per capita, Unit labor cost

References

• ADAMS J. G. U. (1985): “Risk and Freedom”, Transport Publishing Projects, Cardiff.
• BARTH A., WINKER R., PONOCNY-SELIGER E. and SÖGNER L. (2007): “Economic growth and the incidence of occupational injuries in Austria”, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 119(5-6): 158-163.
• BEATSON M. (1995): “Labour Market Flexibility, Employment” Department Research Series, 48. London, The Employment Department
• BIDDLE E., Cost of Fatal Occupational Injuries in the United States, 1980-97, Contemporary Economic Policy July (2004) 370-381.
• BOONE J. and VAN OURS J. C. (2006): “Cyclical Fluctuations in Workplace Accidents”, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper No. 627. Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cprceprdp/3655.htm
• DAVIES R. and JONES P. (2000): “An Analysis of Temporal and National Variations in Reported Workplace Injury Rates”, Institute for employment and research, The University of Warwick (April 2000). Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/ier.pdf
• DAVIES R. and JONES P. (2005): “Trends and Context to Rates of Workplace Injury”, Research Report 386, Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr386.pdf
• ESHLER J. M. (1977): “Filtering of Fatal-Accident Rates, Transportation Research Record”, Issue Number 643, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
• KOSSORIS M. D. (1938): “Industrial injuries and the business cycle”, Monthly Labour Review, 66(5): 579-595
• LAZARIDIS A. (2007): “A Note Regarding the Condition Number: The Case of Spurious and Latent Multicollinearity”, Quality and Quantity, 41(1): 123-135.
• NICHOLS T. (1986): “Industrial injuries in British manufacturing in the 1980’s – a Commentary on Wright’s Article”, Sociological Review, 34(2): 290-306
• NICHOLS T. (2009): “Labour Intensification, Work Injuries and the Measurement of Percentage Utilization of Labour (PUL)”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(4): 569-592.
• OECD (1989): “Employment Outlook 1989, Chapter 4. Occupational Accidents in OECD Countries”. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/54/3888265.pdf.
• OSHA (2001): “FORUM 7, Prevention of Work-related Accidents: a different strategy in a changing world of work? European Conference and Closing Event of the European Week for Safety and Health at Work”, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: http://osha.europa.eu/publications/forum/7/forum7_en.pdf/at_download/file
• OSTRY A. (1998): “Historical Trends in the Epidemiology of Injury and Industrial Disease at the B.C. Worker’s Compensation Board (1950 – 1996)”, A Report Prepared for the B.C. Royal Commission on the Worker’s Compensation Board. Available at: http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/rcwc/research/ostry-injury.pdf
• PARTYKA S. C. (1984): “Simple Models of Fatality Trends Using Employment and Population Data”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16: 211 – 222.
• ROBSON L. S., SHANNON H. S., GOLDENHAR L. M. and HALE A. R. (2000): “Guide to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Work Injuries: How to Show Whether a Safety Intervention Really Works”. Cincinnati (OH): Public Health Service, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
• RUHM C. J. (2000): “Are recessions good for your health?” Quaterly Journal of Economics, 115(2): 617-650
• SALONIEMI A. and OKSANEN H. (1998): “Accidents and fatal accidents – some paradoxes”, Safety Science, 29: 59-66
• SANTANA V. S. and LOOMIS D. (2004): “Informal Jobs and Non-fatal Occupational Injuries”, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 48(2): 147-157.
• STEELE G. (1974): “Industrial Accidents: An Economic Interpretation”, Applied Economics, 6(3): 143-155.
• TAPIA GRANADOS J. A. (2004): “Mortality and economic fluctuations in Sweden 1800 – 1998”, Paper presented at the meeting of the Population Association http://paa2004.princeton.edu/download.asp?submissionId=40066
• TERRÉS DE ERCILLA F., MONDELO P. R., CASADO A. E. and VILELLA E. C. (2004): “Economic fluctuations affecting occupational safety. The Spanish case”, Occupational Ergonomics, 4: 211-228
• WILDE G. J. S. (1982): “The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health”, Risk Analysis, 2: 209-225.
• WILDE G. J. S. (1991): “Economics and Accidents: A Commentary”, Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 24: 81-84.
• WILDE G. J. S. (1994): “Risk Homeostasis Theory and its Promise for Improved Safety” (eds. R. Trimpop and G. J. S. Wilde), Challenges to Accident Prevention: The Issue of Risk Compensation Behaviour. Styx. Groningen, Netherlands.