Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 91 - 99, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540

Öz

Even though there are a range of useful sources on defence economics data, only some of them are used widely. The main sources of export, import and output data sets are Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers-US Department of State (WMEAT), European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) and United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) while SIPRI and WMEAT are for military expenditures. This paper discusses the main features and similarities of data sets from the various sources. Like other industrial/ sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent the creation of long time series.

Kaynakça

  • Da Silva, D. L. (2018), Filling Arms Production Data Gaps: South America as a Case in Point, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 19-25
  • Fleurant, A and Tian, N. (2018), SIPRI’s Arms Producing and Military Services Companies Database, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 13 (2): 5-10 Hartley, K. (2018), Arms industry Data: Knowns and Unknowns, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 30-35
  • http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3AMS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
  • https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/prodcom/data/ excel-files-nace-rev.2
  • https://stat.unido.org/
  • https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/rankorder/2034rank.html
  • https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/ pdf_2017_06/20170629_170629-pr2017-111-en.pdf https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat/
  • Kinsella, D. (2000), Arms production in the third tier: An Analysis of Opportunity and Willingness, International Interactions, 26: 3, 253-286
  • Perlo-Freeman, S. (2018), Arms, Corruption, and the State: Understanding the Role of Arms Trade Corruption in Power Politics, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 36-46 SIPRI.org
  • Smith, R. and Dunne, J. P. (2018), Issues in the Quantitative Analysis of the SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 11-18
  • Wulf, H. (2018), Analysis of SIPRI’s Arms Production Data: Some Suggestions for Expansion, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 26-29
  • Yesilyurt F., Guloglu B., Yesilyurt M. E. and Sezgin Ş. (2014), The Determinants of Arms Production, Defence and Peace Economics, 25 (2): 205-211
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 91 - 99, 30.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Da Silva, D. L. (2018), Filling Arms Production Data Gaps: South America as a Case in Point, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 19-25
  • Fleurant, A and Tian, N. (2018), SIPRI’s Arms Producing and Military Services Companies Database, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 13 (2): 5-10 Hartley, K. (2018), Arms industry Data: Knowns and Unknowns, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 30-35
  • http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3AMS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
  • https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/prodcom/data/ excel-files-nace-rev.2
  • https://stat.unido.org/
  • https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/rankorder/2034rank.html
  • https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/ pdf_2017_06/20170629_170629-pr2017-111-en.pdf https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat/
  • Kinsella, D. (2000), Arms production in the third tier: An Analysis of Opportunity and Willingness, International Interactions, 26: 3, 253-286
  • Perlo-Freeman, S. (2018), Arms, Corruption, and the State: Understanding the Role of Arms Trade Corruption in Power Politics, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 36-46 SIPRI.org
  • Smith, R. and Dunne, J. P. (2018), Issues in the Quantitative Analysis of the SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 11-18
  • Wulf, H. (2018), Analysis of SIPRI’s Arms Production Data: Some Suggestions for Expansion, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 26-29
  • Yesilyurt F., Guloglu B., Yesilyurt M. E. and Sezgin Ş. (2014), The Determinants of Arms Production, Defence and Peace Economics, 25 (2): 205-211
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Filiz Akbaş Yeşilyurt Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-1629-4747

Ensar Yeşilyurt Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-5610-3146

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2020
Kabul Tarihi 30 Mart 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Akbaş Yeşilyurt, F., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2020). Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. Ege Academic Review, 20(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540
AMA Akbaş Yeşilyurt F, Yeşilyurt E. Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. eab. Nisan 2020;20(2):91-99. doi:10.21121/eab.729540
Chicago Akbaş Yeşilyurt, Filiz, ve Ensar Yeşilyurt. “Non-Standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*”. Ege Academic Review 20, sy. 2 (Nisan 2020): 91-99. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540.
EndNote Akbaş Yeşilyurt F, Yeşilyurt E (01 Nisan 2020) Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. Ege Academic Review 20 2 91–99.
IEEE F. Akbaş Yeşilyurt ve E. Yeşilyurt, “Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*”, eab, c. 20, sy. 2, ss. 91–99, 2020, doi: 10.21121/eab.729540.
ISNAD Akbaş Yeşilyurt, Filiz - Yeşilyurt, Ensar. “Non-Standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*”. Ege Academic Review 20/2 (Nisan 2020), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540.
JAMA Akbaş Yeşilyurt F, Yeşilyurt E. Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. eab. 2020;20:91–99.
MLA Akbaş Yeşilyurt, Filiz ve Ensar Yeşilyurt. “Non-Standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*”. Ege Academic Review, c. 20, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 91-99, doi:10.21121/eab.729540.
Vancouver Akbaş Yeşilyurt F, Yeşilyurt E. Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. eab. 2020;20(2):91-9.