Effects of Different Self-Etch Bondings on Microleakage of Class V Resin Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth

Year 2008, Volume: 35 Issue: 2 - Volume: 35 Issue: 2, 79 - 85, 01.05.2008

Aylin Akbay Oba Işıl Şaroğlu Sönmez Seda Ekici

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare theeffects of 3 different self-etch adhesive systems onmicroleakage of class V resin composite restorations in primary teeth. Thirty freshly extractedcaries-free primary molar teeth were used. Class Vcavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth and restored with 3 different adhesive systems Xeno V, Clearfil Tri SBond, Adper Easy Bond and posterior resin composite Clearfil Majesty Posterior . After finishing,the teeth were stored in 37ºC distilled water for 24hours and thermocycled x500 . The specimenswere subjected to conventional dye-penetration testusing basic fuchsin, sectioned and analyzed undermagnification. The extent of leakage was measuredand the results were compared using Chi-Squaretest. Regardless of the adhesive type, all groupsdemonstrated similar amount of leakage alongocclusal margins p>0.05 . However, Clearfil Tri Sbond demonstrated significantly greater leakagealong gingival margins than the other adhesive systems p

Keywords

Dental Leakage, Adhesives, Composite Resins, Tooth Deciduous

Süt dişlerinde farklı self-etch bonding ajanların sınıf V kompozit rezin restorasyonların mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, süt dişlerinde üç farklıself-etch adeziv sistemin mikrosızıntı özelliklerinisınıf V kavitelerde invitro olarak karşılaştırmaktır.Çalışmada 30 adet çürüksüz süt molar dişkullanıldı. Her dişin bukkal ve lingual yüzlerinde,sınıf V kaviteler hazırlanarak, dişler her grupta 10diş olacak şekilde rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı. Kavitelerüç farklı self-etch adeziv sistem Xeno V, ClearfilTri S Bond, Adper Easy Bond ve posterior kompozit materyal Clearfil Majesty Posterior ilerestore edildi. Bitirme işlemlerinden sonra, distilesuda 37ºC’de 24 saat bekletilen örneklere termalsiklus x500 uygulandı ve bazik fuksin kullanılarak geleneksel boya penetrasyonu testine tabi tutuldu. Bukko-lingual yönde alınan kesitler x40büyütmede stereomikroskop altında incelenereksızıntı miktarları skorlandı ve veriler Chi-Kare testikullanılarak analiz edildi.Grupların okluzal kenar mikrosızıntı değerleriarasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir p>0.05 . Servikal kenarda Tri S Bond, diğer adezivsistemlere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeydefazla sızıntı göstermiştir p

Keywords

Dental sızıntı, Adezivler, Kompozit rezinler, Süt dişi

References

• Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2006; p.115.
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lec- ture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.
• Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976; 4: 199-206.
• Ehrnford L, Dérand T. Cervical gap forma- tion in class II composite resin restorations. Swed Dent J 1984; 8: 15-9.
• Erhardt MC, Magalhães CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 396-402.
• Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16: 70-7.
• Yazici AR, Başeren M, Dayangaç B. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 763-9.
• Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997; 8: 306-35.
• Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 25-30.
• Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 95- 110.
• Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total- etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 179-84.
• Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of single step adhesives on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composites. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 67-72.
• Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of pe- netration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296-308.
• Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 430-44.
• Christensen GJ. Self-etching primers are here. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1041-3.
• Bertolotti RL, Laamanen H. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 419-22.
• Torres CP, Corona SAM, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Bond Strength of Self-etching Primer and Total-etch Adhesive Systems to Primary Dentin. J Dent Child 2004;71: 131-4.
• Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994; 44: 19-26.
• Grossman ES, Sparrius O. Marginal adapta- tion of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 519-22.
• Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 582-6.
• Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 132-6.
• Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple- step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 209-13.
• Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 60-7.
• Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 19-24.
• Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microle- akage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 173-85.
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restora- tions. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99.
• Momoi Y, Iwase H, Nakano Y, Kohno A, Asanuma A, Yanagisawa K. Gradual increases in marginal leakage of resin composite restorations with thermal stress. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1659-63.
• Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 295-308.
• Doerr CL, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. Effect of thermocycling on the microleakage of conventi- onal and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 19-21.
• Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 47-51.
• Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analy- sis. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 181-4.
• Amano S, Yamamoto A, Tsubota K, Rikuta A, Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Moore BK. Effect of ther- mal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 616-22.
• Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding effi- cacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound pri- mary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 569-76.
• Asaka Y, Amano S, Rikuta A, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Moore BK. Influence of ther- mal cycling on dentin bond strengths of single-step self-etch adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 73- 8.
• Chiba Y, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Moore BK. Effect of air-drying time of single-application self-etch adhe- sives on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 233-9.
• http://www.kuraraydental.com/products/26 s3bondifu.pdf (erişim tarihi: 05.04.2009)
• Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of func- tional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-8.
• Price CA. The effect of cross-linking agents on the impact resistance of a linear poly(methyl methacrylate) denture-base polymer. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 987-92.
• Hill RG. The crosslinking agent ethylene glycol dimethacrylate content of the currently avai- lable acrylic denture base resins. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 725-6. Arima’da
• Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Properties of highly cross-linked autopolymerizing reline acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73: 55-9.
• Arima T, Hamada T, McCabe JF. The effects of cross-linking agents on some properties of HEMA-based resins. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1597-601.
• Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 512-9.
• Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restora- tions. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 37-41.
• Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 44-6.