AFAD ve FEMA Stratejik Planlarının Afet Yönetimi ve Sendai Çerçevesi Açısından Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 10 - 18, 30.03.2022

Bektaş Sarı

Öz

Introduction: In the world we live in, we witness those disasters and emergencies are experienced more severely with each passing day. When these events occur, the importance of pre-disaster preparedness and planning is as significant as an effective response. The pre-disaster planning process, on the other hand, includes comprehensive and partially complex processes in which short, medium and long-term studies are carried out and operational, tactical and strategic plans are prepared. Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the strategic plans of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in terms of disaster management phases and implementation priorities of the Sendai Disaster Risk Reduction Framework. Methods: In this study, document analysis and content analysis methods, which are included in qualitative research, are used. Strategic plans on the official websites of FEMA and AFAD were accepted as official documents and content analyzes were made using the MAXQDA20 qualitative analysis program. Results: When the plans of both institutions are evaluated, it is seen that FEMA's strategic plan is more purpose-oriented and has a simple structure. While the mitigation phase comes to the fore in FEMA's strategic plan, the response phase remarks in AFAD's strategic plan. While the title of understanding the risk towards Sendai Framework priorities is more prominent in the FEMA’s Strategic Plan, and effective response stands out in the AFAD’s Strategic Plan. Conclusion: When the plans of both institutions are compared, it is seen that the FEMA’ plan is mitigation and risk-oriented, while the AFAD’s plan is more response and crisis-oriented. For future studies, it is suggested that a more comprehensive study can be done by including strategic plan analyzes in the past years.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afet yönetimi, Stratejik plan, AFAD, FEMA, Sendai

Kaynakça

• 1. UN. Report of the Open-Ended Intergovernmental Ex- pert Working Group on Indicators and Terminology Relating to Disaster Risk Reduction. Vol 21184.; 2016. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/50683_oiewgre- portenglish.pdf
• 2. Karaman ZT. Afet Yönetimine Giriş ve Türkiye’de Örgüt- lenme. In: KARAMAN ZT, ALTAY A, eds. Bütünleşik Afet Yönetimi. 1st ed. Birleşik Matbaacılık; 2016:1-38.
• 3. AFAD. Açıklamalı Afet Yönetimi Terimleri Sözlüğü.; 2014. https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yoneti- mi-terimleri-sozlugu
• 4. National Governors’ Association. Comprehensive Emer- gency Management, A Governor’s Guide.; 1979.
• 5. FEMA. History of FEMA. Published 2022. Accessed May 15, 2021. https://www.fema.gov/about/history
• 6. Haddow GD, Bullock JA, Coppola DP. The Historical Context of Emergency Management. In: Introduction to Emergency Management. 3. Baskı. Elsevier Inc.; 2008:1-
• 7. Resmi Gazete. Belediye Kanunu. Resmi Gazete; 1930. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home=http:// www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/1471.pdf&main=http:// www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/1471.pdf
• 8. Aktel M. 5902 Sayılı Yasa İle Türkiye’de Afet Yönetimin- de Oluşan Değişim. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sos Bilim Derg. 2010;(27):1-9. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/downlo- ad/article-file/55629
• 9. Resmi Gazete. Bakanlıkların Kuruluş ve Görev Esas- ları Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname. Resmi Gazete; 1983:432. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ar- siv/18251_1.pdf
• 10. Resmi Gazete. Afetlere İlişkin Acil Yardım Teşkilatı ve Planlama Esaslarına Dair Yönetmelik. Resmi Ga- zete; 1988. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMe- tin/3.5.8812777.pdf
• 11. UNDRR. What is the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction? Published 2020. Accessed October 24, 2020. https://www.undrr.org/implementing-sendai-fra- mework/what-sendai-framework
• 12. UNDRR. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduc- tion 2015 - 2030.; 2015. https://www.undrr.org/imple- menting-sendai-framework/what-sf
• 13. FEMA. Developing and Maintaining Emergency Opera- tions Plans.; 2021. papers2://publication/uuid/AAE7F- C8F-3336-4DE7-ABD8-8CAA6137703D
• 14. Creswell JW, Creswell DJ. Research Designs: Qua- litative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Appro- aches. Fifth Edit. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018. doi:10.1891/9780826146373.0007
• 15. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 9. Baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2013.
• 16. Maxwell JA. Qualitative Research Design: An Interacti- ve Approach. 3rd Editio. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2013.
• 17. Krefting L. Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(3):214- 222. doi:https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
• 18. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and Methodo- logical Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry. Educ Commun Technol. 1982;30(4):233-252. doi:https://www.jstor.org/ stable/30219846
• 19. Houser J. Nursing Research Reading, Using, and Crea- ting Evidence. 4. Baskı. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2018.
• 20. Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th Editio. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand; 2016.
• 21. Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in Qua- litative Research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):522-537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299
• 22. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Met- hods. 4th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
• 23. Cho J, Trent A. Validity in qualitative rese- arch revisited. Qual Res. 2006;6(3):319-340. doi:10.1177/1468794106065006
• 24. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Quali- tative Research. 5. Baskı. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
• 25. Herr K, Anderson GL. The Action Research Disserta- tion: A Guide for Students and Faculty. 2. Baskı. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
• 26. FEMA. FEMA Strategic Plan.; 2021. https:// www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fe- ma_2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf
• 27. AFAD. AFAD Stratejik Plan 2019-2023.; 2018. https:// www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/ Planlar/AFAD-2019_2023-STRATEJIK-PLAN.pdf
• 28. Özdem G. An Analysis of the Mission and Vision Sta- tements on the Strategic Plans of Higher Educati- on Institutions. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egit Bilim. 2011;11(4):1887-1894.
• 29. MakiN,TamuraK,HayashiH.StrategicDisasterReduc- tion Planning with Government Stakeholder Collabora- tion - A Case Study in Nara and Kyoto, Japan. J Disaster Res. 2010;5(5):543-551. doi:10.20965/jdr.2010.p0543