[Vatandaşlık bilgisi dersinde okuma yazma sunma ve grup araştırması metotlarının öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi]

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Grup Araştırması, Okuma-Yazma-Sunma, Vatandaşlık Bilgisi

The effects of reading-writing-presentation and group investigation methods on students’ academic achievements in citizenship lessons

Öz

Citizenship education requires learner-centered teaching and meaningful curricula. Such pedagogy is characterized by a facilitative, conversational approach. This type of approach can improve students’ communication skills, academic achievements and high-order cognitive and intellectual development. It can engage students to think about the meaning of their personal stories and experiences, and lead to greater participation in lessons. It can create a cooperative learning environment and lead to a more positive self-concept. Student learning and achievement in social studies can be improved with the use of cooperative learning methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Group Investigation (GI) and the Reading-Writing-Presenting (RWP) method in cooperative learning on students’ comprehension of citizenship lessons. This research included 145 second-grade students from three classes. For this research, each class was selected to test one teaching method. The first class was selected as the “Group Investigation” Group (n=48), the second was selected as the “Reading-Writing-Presenting” Group (n=49) and the third was selected as the “TeacherCentered Teaching” Group (n=48). The data was collected through the Academic Achievement Test. The results obtained from the data show that the Reading-Writing-Presenting method and Group Investigation method used in the cooperative learning model both have a positive effect on increasing students’ academic knowledge in citizenship lessons. The results of both these methods exceeded the results from the Teacher-Centered Teaching method

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Group investigation, Reading-writing-presenting, Citizenship lesson

Kaynakça

1. Adeyemi, M. B., Boikhutso, K. & Moffat, P. (2003). Teaching and learning of citizenship education at the junior secondary level in Botswana. Pastoral Care, 21 (2), 35-40.
2. Akpınar, Y. & Turan, M. (2012). Designing a collaborative learning game: Its validation with a turn taking control scheme in a primary science unit. Education and Science, 37 (163), 254-267.
3. Avcıoğlu, H. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning and drama techniques in acquisition of social skills by the children with intellectual disabilities. Education and Science, 37 (163), 110-125.
4. Berliner, D. C. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: Rand MC Wally College Publishin.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
6. Bruner, J. S. (1969). On knowing essays for left hand. New York: Athenum.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Butts, R. F. (1989). The morality of democratic citizenship: Goals for civic education in the republic's third century. Calabasas, California: Center for Civic Education.

9. Davies, I. (2011). 100 ideas for teaching citizenship. London: Continuum.
10. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü. & Karaçöp, A. (2007). General chemistry laboratory course of students' academic achievement, laboratory materials identification and usage in the effects of cooperative and traditional learning method. Eurasian Journal of Education Reearchs, 28, 31-43.
11. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü. & Şimşek, U. (2005). İşbirlikli öğrenme yöntemi üzerine derleme: I. İşbirlikli öğrenme yöntemi ve yöntemle ilgili çalışmalar. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 59-83.
12. Fenton, E. (1967). The new social studies. London: Holt Rhine Hart and Winston Inc.
13. Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers' and students' verbal behaviors during cooperative and small- group learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (2), 271-287.
14. Gök, Ö., Doğan, A., Doymuş, K. & Karaçöp, A. (2009). Cooperative learning method of elementary school students' academic achievement and attitude effects. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (1), 193-209.
15. Güvenç, H. (2011).The effect of cooperative learning supported with reflective materials on Turkish teacher candidates self-regulation. Education and Science, 36 (159), 3-13.
16. Hendrix, J. C. (1999). Connecting cooperative learning and social studies. The Clearing House, 73 (1), 57-60.
17. Hennessy, D. & Evans, R. (2006). Small-group learning in the community college classroom. Community College Enterprise, 12 (1), 93-110.
18. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Stanne, M. E. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Cooperative Learning Center, http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBITB.pdf. İndirme Tarihi: 16.02.2012.
19. Lawson, H. (2001) Active citizenship in schools and the community. The Curriculum Journal, 12 (2), 163–78.
20. Mary, A. H., Richard, G. N. & Chapman, C. (2000). Service learning in college political science: queries and commentary. Political Science and Politics, 33 (3), 617-622.
21. McCowan, T. (2009). Rethinking citizenship education: A curriculum for participatory democracy. London: Continuum.
22. McKeachie, W. J. (2002). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Press.
23. Millis, B. J. & Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty, American Council on Education. Phoenix: The Oryx Press.
24. Mitchell, M. G., Montgomery, H., Holder, M. & Stuart, D. (2008). Group investigation as a cooperative learning strategy: an integrated analysis of the literature. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54 (4), 388-395.
25. Oh, P. S. & Shin, M. (2005). Students’ reflections on implementation of group investigation in Korean secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3 (2), 327–349.
26. Richardson, V. (2005). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. Constructivist teacher education; Building a world of new understandings (Edt: V. Richardson). London: The Falmer Press.
27. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 71−82.
28. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58 (5), 1161-1167.
29. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 87−101.
30. Smyth, A. H. (1907). The writings of Benjamin Franklin. (Edt: A. H. Smyth). New York and London, 1905-1907), 10, 97-105.
31. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E. & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69 (1), 21-51.
32. Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J. M. & Bjorklund, S. A. (2001). Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (1), 123-130.
33. Wales, J., Clarke, P. (2005). Learning citizenship practical teaching strategies for secondary schools. New York: Routledge Falmer.
34. Whittaker, T. (1995). Violence, gender and elder abuse: Towards a feminist analysis and practice. Journal of Gender Studies, 4 (1), 35-45. Vatandaşlık Bilgisi Dersinde Okuma Yazma Sunma ve Grup Araştırması