Individual Innovativeness Levels and Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Preservice Teachers in Pedagogical Formation Training Certificate Program

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 171 - 188, 01.10.2017

Gülşen Öztürk Yurtseven Çiğdem Aldan Karademir

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Individual Innovativeness Levels and Lifelong Learning Tendencies of Preservice Teachers in Pedagogical Formation Training Certificate Program

Öz

In this study, individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies of preservice teacher in pedagogical formation training certificate program were examined. The sample of the research was composed of a total of 331 preservice teachers (203 female, 128 male) undertaking a pedagogical formation training certificate program at the Faculty of Education of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey, during the spring semester of the 2015-2016 academic year. The “Individual Innovativeness Scale,” which was developed by Hurt, Joseph, and Cook (1977) and adapted to Turkish by Kılıçer and Odabaşı (2010), and the “Lifelong Learning Tendency Scale” developed by Diker-Coşkun (2009) were used during the data collection process. Data was analyzed using comparison techniques and multiple linear regression analysis. According to the results, individual innovativeness levels of some preservice teachers are high, and some are low. The preservice teachers are in the questioning category of individual innovativeness. While a statistically significant difference was found between their individual innovativeness according to the preservice teachers’ faculty, there was no significant difference according to gender. Lifelong learning tendencies are above the medium level, and significantly differ according to gender and faculty variables. Lifelong learning tendencies of preservice teachers predict 30% of their individual innovativeness levels

Anahtar Kelimeler

Individual innovativeness, Lifelong learning, Pedagogical formation training certificate program

Kaynakça

• Akın-Kösterelioğlu, M., & Demir, F. (2014). The impact of teachers’ individual innovativeness levels on teacher leadership. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies (JASSS), 26, 247-256.
• Alkın-Şahin, S., Tunca, N., Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2015). Relationship between Professional values and critical thinking disposition of science-technology and mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), 25-40.
• Argon, T., İsmetoğlu, M., & Çelik-Yılmaz, D. (2015). The opinions of branch teachers about their techno pedagogical education competencies and individual innovativeness levels. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(2), 319-333.
• Armstrong, L. (2014). Barriers to innovation and change in higher education. TIAA-CREF Institute, University https://www.tiaainstitute.org/publication/barriers-innovation-and-change. Southern California. Retrieved from
• Ayra, M., Kösterioğlu, İ., & Çelen, Ü. (2016). Identifying the lifelong learning tendencies of the teachers in terms of different variables. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(1), 497-516.
• Bitkin, A. (2012). The relationship between individual innovativeness levels and information acquisition competencies of prospective teachers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Harran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
• Brewer, D. J., & Tierney, W. G. (2010, June). Barriers to innovation in US higher education. Paper presented at the American Enterprise Institute Conference Reinventing the American University: The Promise of Innovation in Higher Education. Washington, D.C., USA.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi elkitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem.
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17(4), 397-414.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem.
• Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service Teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 797-807.
• Dave, R. H. (Ed.). (1976). Foundations of lifelong education: Studies in lifelong education. Paris: Pergamon.
• Demiralay, R., Bayır, E. A., & Gelibolu, M. F. (2016). Investigation of relationship between students’ personal innovativeness and readiness for online learning. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(1), 161-168.
• Demir-Başaran, S., & Keleş, S. (2015). Who is innovative? Examination of teachers’ innovativeness level. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 106-118.
• Demirel, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2010). Prospective teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy self-efficacy beliefs. In Y. Akpınar & A. İşman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th. International Educational Technology Conference (pp. 1126-1133). Istanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.
• Demirel, M., & Yağcı, E. (2012). Perceptions of primary school teacher candidates about lifelong learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 1(Special ed.), 100-111.
• Deveci, T. (2014). Lifelong learning orientations of freshman engineering students and faculty members. Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 14-22. doi:10.2399/yod.14.001
• Diker-Coşkun, Y. (2009). Investigation of lifelong learning tendency of undergraduate students in terms of some variables (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Diker-Coşkun, Y., & Demirel, M. (2012). Lifelong learning tendencies of university students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 42, 108-120.
• Evin-Gencel, İ. E. (2013). Prospective teachers’ perceptions towards lifelong learning competencies. Education and Science, 38(170), 237-252.
• Friessen, N., & Anderson, T. (2004). Interaction for life-long learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 679-687.
• Garipağaoğlu, B. C. (2013). The effect of self-efficacy on the lifelong learning tendencies of computer education and instructional technologies pre-service teachers: A case study. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 224- 236.
• Getz, M., Siegfried, J., & Anderson, K. (1997). Adoption of innovations in higher education. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37(3), 605-631.
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 321-330). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Gür-Erdoğan, D., Ekşioğlu, S., Zafer-Güneş, D., & Sezen-Gültekin, G. (2014). The relationship between social entrepreneurship characteristics and the personal innovativeness of prospective teachers. Anthropologist, 18(3), 727-733.
• Hart, R. (2006). Using e-learning to help students develop lifelong learning skills (Master’s thesis). Royal Road University, Canada: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
• Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
• İzci, E., & Koç, S. (2012). The evaluation of the teacher candidates’ views on the lifelong learning. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), 101-114.
• Jallade, J. P., & Mora, J. G. (2001). Lifelong learning: international injunctions and university practices. European Journal of Education, 36(3), 361-377.
• Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
• Jerkins, A. (2004). Women, lifelong learning and employment. London: School of Economics and Political Science.
• Kant, I. (2016). Eğitim üzerine ruhun eğitimi-ahlaki eğitim-pratik eğitim. (A. Aydoğan, Trans.). İstanbul: Say.
• Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi, kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: Nobel.
• Kılıç, H., & Ayvaz-Tuncel, Z. (2015). Primary subject teachers’ individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 4(7), 25-37.
• Kılıçer, K. (2011). Individual innovativeness profiles of prospective teachers in computer education and instructional technology (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir.
• Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Individual innovativeness scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 150-164.
• Koçak, C., & Önen, A. S. (2012). Analysis on reflective thinking tendencies of student teachers according to their personal innovativeness. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 2(Special ed.), 46-54.
• Korucu, A. T., & Olpak, Y. Z. (2015). Examination of teacher candidates individual innovativeness properties from the different variables. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 11-127.
• Köroğlu, A. Y. (2014). Research on information and communication technologies self-efficacy perception, technological materials usage attitude and individual innovativeness level of pre- school teachers and pre-school preservice teachers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. M. (2012). Adoption of web 2.0 tools and the individual innovativeness levels of instructors. Journal of the Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education, 18(2), 35-47.
• Nosich, G. M. (2001). Eleştirel düşünme ve disiplinlerarası eleştirel düşünme rehberi (B. Aybek, Trans.). Ankara: Anı.
• Oktuğ, Z., & Özden, M. S. (2013). The moderating role of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between individualism/collectivism and individual innovativeness. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 1-22.
• Örün, Ö., Orhan, D., Dönmez, P., & Kurt, A. A. (2015). Exploring the relationship between individual innovativeness and technology attitude of teacher candidates. Trakya University Journal of Education, 5(1), 65-76.
• Özçiftçi, M. (2014). The relationship between primary school teachers' lifelong learning trends and self-efficiencies about the educational technology standards (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Amasya University, Institute of Social Science, Amasya.
• Özgür, H. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between critical thinking dispositions and individual innovativeness of ICT pre-service teachers in terms of various variables. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 409-420.
• Özgür, H. (2016). A study on information literacy self-efficacies and lifelong learning competences of pre-service teachers. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 22-38.
• Pınarcık, Ö., Özözen-Danacı, M., Deniz, M. E., & Eran, N. (2016). Perceptions of pre-school teachers to lifelong learning qualifications. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1966-1983.
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free.
• Rogers, R. K., & Wallace, J. D. (2011). Predictors of technology integration in education: A study of anxiety and innovativeness in teacher preparation. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(2), 28-61.
• Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51(4), 411-424.
• Shavinina, L. V., & Seeratan, K. L. (2003). On the nature of individual innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 31-43). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Shouping, H., Scheuch, K., & Gayles, G. J. (2009). The influences of faculty on undergraduate student participation in research and creative activities. Innovative Higher Education, 34(3), 173-183.
• Smith, G. F. (2003). Towards a logic of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 347-365). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Şahin, M., Akbaşlı, S., & Yanpar-Yelken, T. (2010). Key competences for lifelong learning: The case of prospective teachers. Educational Research and Review, 5(10), 545-556.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
• Yılmaz-Öztürk, Z., & Summak, M. S. (2014). Investigation of primary school teachers individual innovativeness. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 2(5), 844- 853.
• Yüksel, I. (2015). Rogers’ diffusion of innovation model in action: Individual innovativeness profiles of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 17(2), 507-534.
• Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: John Wiley. Please cite as: