Identifying the Relationships Between Perseverance, Openness to Problem Solving, and Academic Success in PISA 2012 Turkey

Öz

In this study, the predictive roles of perseverance and openness to problem solving on success in the lower and upper quartiles of score distribution are analyzed in scientific, mathematical, and reading domains of PISA 2012 Turkey sample. Since their index values can’t be calculated due to missing values, some students are excluded from the sample. The study sample is comprised of 3,190 students. Regression models in which perseverance and openness to problem solving are predictive variables and success is response variable are formed for the lower and upper quartiles of score distribution of each domain. Models are analyzed by quantile regression analysis. It is found that there is a positive, medium level, significant relationship between perseverance and openness to problem solving. The results of quantile regression analysis show that perseverance predicts success better in the lower quartile of score distribution while openness to problem solving predicts success better in the upper quartile of score distribution in all domains. Based on these results, suggestions regarding classroom activities, assessment processes and feedback given to students are discussed respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Students achievement
• Perseverance
• Openness to problem solving
• PISA
• Quantile regression analysis

Identifying the Relationships Between Perseverance, Openness to Problem Solving, and Academic Success in PISA 2012 Turkey

Öz

In this study, the predictive roles of perseverance and openness to problem solving on success in the lower and upper quartiles of score distribution are analyzed in scientific, mathematical, and reading domains of PISA 2012 Turkey sample. Since their index values can’t be calculated due to missing values, some students are excluded from the sample. The study sample is comprised of 3,190 students. Regression models in which perseverance and openness to problem solving are predictive variables and success is response variable are formed for the lower and upper quartiles of score distribution of each domain. Models are analyzed by quantile regression analysis. It is found that there is a positive, medium level, significant relationship between perseverance and openness to problem solving. The results of quantile regression analysis show that perseverance predicts success better in the lower quartile of score distribution while openness to problem solving predicts success better in the upper quartile of score distribution in all domains. Based on these results, suggestions regarding classroom activities, assessment processes and feedback given to students are discussed respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Identifying
• Relationships
• Perseverance

Kaynakça

1. Akın, A., & Arslan, S. (2014). Başarı yönelimleri ile kararlılık arasındaki ilişkiler. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 267-274.
2. Beaty, R., Nusbaum, E., & Silvia, P. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 287-292.
3. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
4. Boyce, M. C. (2011). Fostering hope and perseverance in underachieving students through a school-based intervention (Doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego.
5. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Virginia, USA: ASCD Member Book.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., & Karadeniz, Ş. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
7. Chen, F., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2014). Principles of quantile regression and an application. Language Testing, 31(1), 63-87.
8. Çelik, O., & Selim, S. (2014). Türkiye’de kamu ve özel sektör ücret farklılıklarının kantil regresyon yaklaşımı ile analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 21(1), 205-232.

9. Çiftçi, C., & Kangallı, S. G. (2015). Eğitim ve gelir. Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), 141-152.
10. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
11. Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674-685.
12. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. USA: Taylor & Francis.
13. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
14. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). Social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
15. Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. California: The Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education
16. Karakaya, İ., & Kutlu, Ö. (2002). Ortaöğretim kurumları öğrenci seçme ve yerleştirme sınavının (okösys) yordama geçerliğine ilişkin bir araştırma. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama Dergisi, 1(2), 235-247.
17. Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143-156.
18. Lin, W.-L., Chen, H.-C., Hsu, K.-Y., & Wang, J.-W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(2), 112-123.
19. McCutcheon, C. A. (2014). Perseverance and persistence in achieving educational goals: A case study of an adult charter high school examining perseverance of students utilizing a mixed methods approach (Doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, Indiana.
20. Ministry of Education. (2015). Insights for teachers: New Zealand students’ self-belief and confidence and implications for achievement. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/files/Resource/insights-forteachers-nz-student-self-belief.pdf
21. Nicholls, J. (1983). Conception of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Steveson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 211-237). NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
22. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn-students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Volume III). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-resultsvolume-III.pdf OECD. (2014). Strengthening resilience through education and skills: PISA results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/mcm/Pisa2012_Overview_v25_04_05_14.pdf
23. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Philips, D. (1984). The illusion of incompetence among academically competent children. Child Development, 55(6), 2000-2016.
25. Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2015). The relations among openness, perseverance and performance in creative problem solving: A substantive methodological approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 4-17.
26. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
27. Stipek, D. (1988). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. Strayhorn, T. L. (2014). What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? Journal of African American Studies, 18(1), 1-10.
28. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. Tollefson, N. (2000). Classroom applications of cognitive theories of motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 63-83.