Okul Kütüphanelerinin Öğrenme Kuramları Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Model Önerisi

Bu makalenin ilk hali 16 Ekim 2025 tarihinde yayımlandı. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ebt/article/1717983

Düzeltme Notu

85-86. sayılarımızda teknik bir sorun nedeniyle farklı bir dosyası yüklenmiş olan bu makaleyi özür dileyerek düzeltiyoruz.

Öz

Bu çalışmada, okul kütüphanelerinin öğrencilerin eğitsel, bilişsel ve sosyal gelişimini desteklemesi ve öğrenci merkezli okuryazarlık ve araştırmayı teşvik etmesi bağlamında çeşitli öğrenme kuramlarının önemi ve etkileri araştırılmaktadır. Bunun için, öncelikle, davranışçı, bilişsel, yapısalcı, insancıl, bağlantısal ve sosyokültürel öğrenme kuramları ana hatları ile irdelenmiş, daha sonra her birinin okul kütüphaneleri ile ilişkilendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Bu kuramların sağladığı içgörüler temel alınarak okul kütüphanelerinin öğrenci öğrenmelerine destek bağlamında etkinliği ve verimliliğini sağlayacak bir model önerisi geliştirilmiştir. Esnek, katılımcı ve sosyal olarak ilgi çekici kütüphane ortamlarına vurgu yapan kapsamlı bir model olan Öğrenci Merkezli Etkileşimli Öğrenme Modeli'nin, öğrenci motivasyonunu, eleştirel düşünmeyi ve etkili kaynak kullanımını geliştirmesi hedeflenmektedir. Literatürden yararlanılarak nitel betimleme yöntemi ile hazırlanan çalışmanın bulguları, öğrenme kuramlarını dikkate alan ve bu kuramlar konusunda farkındalığı olan kütüphanecilerle desteklenen okul kütüphanelerinin, öğrencilerin bilişsel ve sosyal gereksinimlerine yanıt olduğunu, nihayetinde öğrenci başarısını ve yaşam boyu öğrenme yeterliliklerini artırarak okul kütüphanelerini aktif öğrenme ekosistemlerine dönüştürdüğünü göstermektedir. Kütüphaneciler, önerilen modeli desteklemede, dolayısıyla öğrenci başarısını ve yaşam boyu öğrenme yeterliliklerini artırmada ve okul kütüphanelerini aktif öğrenme ekosistemlerine dönüştürmede önemli bir rol oynarlar. Ulusal literatürde öğrenme kuramları ile okul kütüphanelerini ilişkilendiren bir çalışmaya rastlanmaması, uluslararası literatürde ise kuramları sentezleyerek bir model öneren ve konuyu bu kapsamda ele alan araştırmaların eksikliği, bu çalışmayı özgün duruma getirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okul kütüphanesi
• öğrenme kuramları
• öğrenci merkezli öğrenme
• üstbiliş
• pedagoji
• bilgi okuryazarlığı

Kaynakça

1. Akın, G. (2014). The term of andragogy and the difference between andragogy and pedagogy. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 47(1), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001327
2. Alver, M. (2019). An evaluation of students ‟and teachers” opinions about Enriched Libraries (Z-Libraries). Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(4), 1-13. http://jets.redfame.com
3. Anna, N. E. V., Kiran, K. & Yanti Idaya, A.M.K. (2023). Teaching strategies for library instruction: Directions from the literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 28(2), 63-87. DOI: 10.22452/mjlis. vol28no2.4
4. Aydın, A. (2004). Okul kütüphanesinin çağdaş eğitime katkısı ve yasal dayanaklar açısından Türkiye’de durum [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İstanbul Üniversitesi
5. Bamigbola, A. A. (2021). School libraries role in connected learning: Perception of school librarians in Nigeria. The 49th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship, IASL Annual Conference Proceedings DOI: 10.29173/iasl8273 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355670336_School_Libraries_Role_in_Connected_Learning_Perception_of_School_Librarians_in_Nigeria
6. Booth, C. (2011). Reflective teaching, effective learning: Instructional literacy for library educators. American Library Association.
7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
8. Brückner, M. (2015). Educational technology. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2180.9449 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272494060_Educational_Technology

9. Chand, S. P. (2023). Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12(7), 274-278. DOI: 10.21275/SR23630021800
10. Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O. & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising. Publications, 11(2),1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
11. Cloke, H. (2024, 24 Haziran). Constructivist learning theory: How learners build their knowledge. https://www.growthengineering.co.uk/constructivist-learning-theory/ [İnternet].
12. Dillon, R. F. (2024). Little Albert study. https://www.ebsco.com/researchstarters/psychology/little-albert-study
13. Fabbi, J. L (2012). Fortifying the pipeline: An exploratory study of high school factors impacting the information literacy of first-year college students. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1516. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4251389
14. Flanagan, C., Jarvis, M., Liddle, R., Russell, J. & Wood, M. (2022). Edexcel psychology for A level year 1 and AS: Student book. London: Hachette Learning.
15. Gandhi, M. H. & Mukherji, P. (2022). Learning theories. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL [İnternet].
16. Giannoukos, G. (2024). Main learning theories in education. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(5), 93-100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384112532_Main_Learning_Theories_in_Education
17. Harris, B. (1979). Whatever happened to Little Albert?. American Psychologist, 34(2), 151–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232506368_Whatever_Happened_to_Little_Albert
18. Karaman, E. & Eravcı, D. B. (2020). Güvenlik kültürü için öğrenme kuramlarinin değerlendirilmesi. OHS Academy İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Akademi Dergisi, 4(1), 62-73. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/1624351
19. Khalid, M. A. (2015). Educational theories of cognitive development. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 313-321. https://www.academia.edu/77163212/Educational_Theories_of_Cognitive_Development
20. Khan, Z. A., Adnan, J. & Raza, S. A. (2023). Cognitive learning theory and development: Higher education case study. D. Ortega-Sanchez (Ed.). Education - Annual Volume 2023 içinde (ss. 17-36). London, UK: IntechOpen.
21. Khatib, M. (2013). Humanistic education: Concerns, implications and applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 45-51. Knowles, M. (1977). The adult education movement in the United States (Revised Edition). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
22. Kolektif Labs (t.y.). Davranışçı öğrenme kuramı nedir? https://tezgahcilar.com/davranisci-ogrenme-kurami-nedir/Kurttila-Matero, E. (2011). School library: A tool for developing the school’s operating culture. Oulu: University of Oulu. Lankes, R. D. (2011). The Atlas of New Librarianship. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
23. Limberg, L. & Alexandersson, M. (2003). The school library as a space for learning. School Libraries Worldwide, 9(1), 1-15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267421306_The_School_Library_as_a_Space_for_Learning
24. McCauley, D. (2006). Constructivist learning theory and the reference librarian https://debbiemccauleyauthor.wordpress.com/essays/constructivistlearning-theory-and-the-reference-librarian/
25. Medaille, A. (2024). The librarian’s guide to learning theory: Practical applications in library settings. Chicago : ALA Editions.
26. Mendinhos, I. (2021). School library self-evaluation: A way to improve learning through collaboration. IASL Annual Conference Proceedings. DOI: 10.29173/iasl7699 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350599552_School_Library_Self-Evaluation_A_Way_to_Improve_Learning_through_Collaboration
27. Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design & learning theory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242429320_Instructional_Design_Learning_Theory
28. Merriam, S. B. (2017). Adult learning theory: Evolution and future directions. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 26, 21-37.
29. Middleton, L., Hall, H. & Raeside, R. (2019). Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(4), 927–937. DOI: 10.1177/0961000618769985
30. Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54-72. DOI: 10.1080/026013700293458
31. Mpinge, M. & Onyango, D. (2023). The effect of school internal environments on students’ effective learning at Maswa District. East African Journal of Education Studies, 6(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.6.2.1207
32. Muin, A., Panjaitan, A., Hotimah, O. & Zid, M. (2024). The use of learning resources for high school geography teachers at MGMP DKI JAKARTA. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 34(1), 153-167. https://journals2.ums.ac.id/jpis/article/view/4911
33. Muvhunzwi, A. (2012). Bridging the divide: Integrating and positioning school libraries and curriculum with the emerging technologies: Case study of Celebration School user community. 14th LIASA Conference, Durban 1-5 Ekim 2012, 1-8. https://independent.academia.edu/AMuvhunzwi
34. Neuman, D. (1997). Learning and the digital library. Library Trends, 45(4), 687-707.
35. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 3.bs. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
36. Papadakis, S. & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Learning computational thinking development in young children with bee-bot educational robotics. M. Kalogiannakis ve S. Papadakis (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education içinde (ss. 289-309). Hershey, PA: IGI Global
37. Pappas, C. (2021, 12 Mayıs). Instructional design models and theories: Connectionism theory. https://elearningindustry.com/connectionism
38. Pardjono, P. (2016). Active learning: The Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and Constructivist Theory perspectives. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(3), 163-178. DOI: 10.17977/jip.v9i3.487
39. Pelayo, E. (2020). Trauma-informed school libraries: a space for all. Knowledge Quest, 48(3), 50-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1238671
40. Pramana, M. (2024). Understanding behavioristic theory. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 4(2), 161-167. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382575410_Understanding_Behavioristic_Theory
41. Rahmatirad, M. (2020). A review of socio-cultural theory. SIASAT Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Studies, 5(3), 23-31. https://siasatjournal.id/index.php/siasat/article/view/66
42. Rilling, M. (2000). John Watson’s paradoxical struggle to explain Freud. American Psychologist, 55(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.3.301
43. Saarsar, P. (2018). Exploring the constructivist approach in education: Theory, practice, and implications. International Journal of Research and
44. Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 5(2), 716-725. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379669385_Exploring_the_Constructivist_Approach_in_Education_Theory_Practice_and_Implications
45. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. 6. Bs., Boston: Pearson.
46. Shabani, K. (2010). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1081990.pdf
47. Stewart, P. (2018). School library design, facilities and resources for sustainable cognitive and social development of students: An evaluative case study. School Libraries Worldwide, 24(2), 30-45.
48. Suh, J. W. (2011). A Study on the school library assisted instruction as a practical element of constructivism. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 215-236. https://journal.kci.go.kr/liss/archive/articleView?artiId=ART001567625
49. Taber, K. S. (2018). Scaffolding learning: Principles for effective teaching and the design of classroom resources. M. Abend (Ed.). Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation içinde (ss. 1-43). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
50. Tandoc, J. B. & Lintag, V. B. (2025). Students preferred learning modalities and their learning styles basis for differentiated instruction model. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 371-394. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15390350
51. Transue, B. M. (2013). Connectivism and information literacy: Moving from learning theory to pedagogical practice. Public & Access Services Quarterly, 9(3), 185-195. DOI: 10.1080/15228959.2013.815501
52. Tuckett, H. W. & Stoffle, C. J. (1984). Learning theory and the self-reliant library user, RQ, 24(1), 58-66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25827283
53. Wanja, L., Namande, B. W. & Awuor, F. M. (2022). User education practices on utilization of electronic resources at the Kenya Revenue Authority Library, Nairobi. Technology and Investment, 13, 20-36. https://www.scirp.org/journal/ti
54. Wati, T. L., Mustaji, M. & Mariono, A. (2022). The effectiveness of connectivism based area learning models to improve creativity and social skills in arts and craft in elementary school students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(12), 678-689. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/14777
55. Wheaton, M., Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W. & Kannan, A. (2024). Sociocultural learning theories for social-ecological change. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1193–1210 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2347888
56. Wilcox, P. & Monobe, D. (2021) Matrix of humanistic lifelong learning for public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 40(5), 379-405, DOI: 10.1080/01616846.2020.1754056 https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.202.1754056
57. Williams, V. (2025). The librarian’s guide to learning theory: Practical applications in library settings. Theological Librarianship, 18(1), 20-22. DOI: 10.31046/16jw0x31
58. Yılmaz, E. (2015). Eğitimde okul kütüphaneleri: Türkiye’de durum. Millî Eğitim, 45(208), 259-286. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/36142/406098
59. Zuelke, E. H. (1988). Critical thinking skills: The role of the school library. Indiana Libraries, 7(2), 57-59.