Uluslararası ve Ulusüstü Hukuk Bağlamında Ulusal İnsan Hakları Kurumlarının Tarihsel Gelişimi

Öz

Ulusal insan hakları kurumları, bir yandan git gide daha yaygın biçimde görülmeye, diğer yandan uluslararası ve ulusüstü hukuk tarafından git gide daha çok düzenlenmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışma, ulusal insan hakları kurumlarının tarihsel gelişimini uluslararası ve ulusüstü hukuktaki düzenlemeler bağlamında, 2000’ler öncesi ve sonrası dönem olarak konuyu ikiye ayırarak, incelemektedir. Bu yönden, uluslararası hukuk açısından (küresel çapta) Birleşmiş Milletler ve (bölgesel çapta) Avrupa Konseyi ve ulusüstü hukuk açısından (bölgesel çapta) Avrupa Birliği temel alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak, uluslararası ve ulusüstü hukukun, ulusal insan hakları kurumlarının tarihsel gelişiminde git gide artan bir rol üstlenmekte olduğu görülmektedir. Daha spesifik olarak ise üç eğilim gözlenmektedir: (i) Ulusal insan hakları kurumları, uluslararası veya ulusüstü hukuki belgelere bazı yönlerden etki vermek üzere zorunlu olarak kurdurulabilmektedir, (ii) ulusal insan hakları kurumlarının asgari standartları, temel olarak Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından belirlense de Avrupa Konseyi ve Avrupa Birliği tarafından ileri taşınmaya çalışılmaktadır, (iii) bu asgari standartları belirleyen belgeler, esnek hukuktan bağlayıcı hukuka, dolayısıyla da yeknesaklaşmaya doğru gitmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ulusal İnsan Hakları Kurumları
• Birleşmiş Milletler
• Paris İlkeleri
• Avrupa Konseyi
• Avrupa Birliği

Historical Development of National Human Rights Institutions in the Context of International and Supranational Law

Öz

National human rights institutions have become increasingly widespread and regulated by international and supranational law. This article examines the historical development of national human rights institutions in the context of rules in international and supranational law, dividing the subject into two periods: before and after the 2000s. In this respect, the United Nations (on a global scale) and the Council of Europe (on a regional scale) are taken as basis in terms of international law, and the European Union (on a regional scale) is taken as basis in terms of supranational law. As a result, it appears that international and supranational law is assuming an increasing role in the historical development of national human rights institutions. More specifically, three trends are observed: (i) National human rights institutions may be compulsorily established in order to give effect to some aspects of international or supranational legal instruments, (ii) although the minimum standards of national human rights institutions are mainly determined by the United Nations, efforts are being made to move them forward by the Council of Europe and the European Union, (iii) the documents that determine these minimum standards are moving from soft law to hard law and therefore towards uniformity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• National Human Rights Institutions
• United Nations
• Paris Principles
• Council of Europe
• European Union

Kaynakça

1. AB Bakanlığı, “Türkiye İçin Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesi ve İlgili Diğer Belgeler”, https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/MuzakereCercevesi/Muzakere_Cercevesi_2005.pdf, E.T. 19.09.2023.
2. Aichele, Valentin, National Human Rights Institutions: An Introduction, Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte, Berlin 2010.
3. Bantekas, Ilias/Seatzu, Francesco, Editörler. The UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2023.
4. Bell, Mark, “EU Anti-Discrimination Law: Navigating Sameness and Difference”, The Evolution of EU Law, Editörler, Paul Craig, Gráinne de Búrca, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021, s. 651–677.
5. Bond, Martyn, The Council of Europe: Structure, History and Issues in European Politics, Routledge, London 2013.
6. Brodie, Meg, “Progressing Norm Socialisation: Why Membership Matters, The Impact of the Accreditation Process of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights”, Nordic Journal of International Law, C. 80, S. 2, 2011, s. 143–192.
7. Burri, Susanne, “Eu Anti-Discrimination Law: Historical Development and Main Concepts”, Taking Employment Discrimination Seriously: Chinese and European Perspectives, Editörler, Yuwen Li, Jenny Goldschmidt, Brill Nijhoff, the Netherlands 2009, s. 209–238.
8. Cardenas, Sonia, “Emerging Global Actors: The United Nations and National Human Rights Institutions”, Global Governance, C. 9, S. 1, 2003, s. 23–42.

9. Council of Europe, “Recommendation CM/Rec(2021)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the development and strengthening of effective, pluralist and independent national human rights institutions” (CM/Rec(2021)1), https://rm.coe.int/0900001680a1f4da, E.T. 19.09.2023.
10. Council of Europe, “Türkiye”, https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/turkey, E.T. 19.09.2023.
11. Council of Europe, “Recommendation No. R (85) 13”, https://rm.coe.int/cmrec-85-13-on-the-institution-of-the-ombudsman/1680a43b56, E.T. 25.09.2023.
12. Council of Europe, “Recommendation No. R (97) 14”, https://rm.coe.int/16804fecf5, E.T. 25.09.2023.
13. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Steering Committee for Human Rights, “1444th meeting, 28 September 2022”, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680a7b71b, E.T. 26.09.2023.
14. de Beco, Gauthier, “National Human Rights Institutions in Europe”, Human Rights Law Review, C. 7, S. 2, 2007, s. 331–370.
15. de Beco, Gauthier, “Networks of European National Human Rights Institutions”, European Law Journal, C. 14, S. 6, 2008, s. 860–877.
16. de Beco, Gauthier, “Article 33(2) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Another Role for National Human Rights Institutions?”, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, C. 29, S. 1, 2011, s. 84–106.
17. de Beco, Gauthier/Murray, Rachel, A Commentary on the Paris Principles on National Human Rights Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
18. de Witte, Bruno, “National Equality Institutions and the Domestication of EU Non-Discrimination Law”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, C. 18, S. 1–2, 2011, s. 157–178.
19. de Witte, Bruno, “New Institutions for Promoting Equality in Europe: Legal Transfers, National Bricolage and European Governance”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, C. 60, S. 1, 2012, s. 49–74.
20. Dışişleri Bakanlığı, “Her Türlü Irk Ayrımcılığının Ortadan Kaldırılmasına İlişkin Uluslararası Sözleşme”, http://ua.mfa.gov.tr/detay.aspx?6085, E.T. 19.09.2023.
21. Ellis, Evelyn/Watson, Philippa, EU Anti-Discrimination Law, 2d ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
22. Eren, Abdurrahman, Ulusal İnsan Hakları Kurumları, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2012.
23. EUR-Lex, “Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11997E/TXT, E.T. 26.09.2023.
24. European Commission, “Turkey Negotiating Framework - October2005”, https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkey-negotiating-framework-october-2005_en, E.T. 19.09.2023.
25. European Commission, “COM(2022) 688 final, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in matters of employment and occupation, and deleting Article 20 of Directive 2006/54/EC and Article 11 of Directive 2010/41/EU”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0688, E.T. 19.09.2023.
26. European Commission, “COM(2022) 689 final, Proposal for a Council Directive on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment between persons irrespective of their racial or ethnic origin, equal treatment in the field of employment and occupation between persons irrespective of their religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, equal treatment between women and men in matters of social security and in the access to and supply of goods and services, and deleting Article 13 of Directive 2000/43/EC and Article 12 of Directive 2004/113/EC”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0689, E.T. 19.09.2023.
27. European Parliament, “EU Texts”, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/delegations/en/d-tr/documents/eu-texts, E.T. 19.09.2023.
28. European Network of Legal Experts in Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination, A Comparative Analysis of Non-Discrimination Law in Europe 2021, Haz. Isabelle Chopin ve Catharina Germaine, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2022.
29. European Network of National Human Rights Institutions, “High Level Meeting”, https://ennhri.org/online-high-level-meeting-council-of-europe-recommendation-on-the-development-and-strengthening-of-effective-pluralist-and-independent-nhris/, E.T. 25.09.2023.
30. European Network of National Human Rights Institutions, “UN Paris Principles & Accreditation”, https://ennhri.org/about-nhris/un-paris-principles-and-accreditation/, E.T. 10.01.2024.
31. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Handbook on the Establishment and Accreditation of National Human Rights Institutions in the European Union, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2012.
32. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Strong and Effective National Human Rights Institutions – Challenges, Promising Practices and Opportunities, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2020.
33. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights/Council of Europe, Handbook on European Non-Discrimination Law, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 2018.
34. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, “Status Accreditation Chart as of 29 November 2023”, https://ganhri.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/StatusAccreditationChartNHRIs_Nov23.pdf, E.T. 09.01.2024.
35. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, “Who we are”, https://ganhri.org/history-of-ganhri-and-nhris/, E.T. 09.01.2024.
36. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, “Statute”, https://ganhri.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/GANHRI-Statuteadopted-March2023_EN.pdf, E.T. 09.01.2024.
37. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, “General Observations of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation”, https://ganhri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/EN_GeneralObservations_Revisions_adopted_21.02.2018_vf.pdf, E.T. 09.01.2024.
38. Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, “Rules of Procedure for the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation”, https://ganhri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/EN_GANHRI_SCA_RulesOfProcedure_adopted_July2020.pdf, E.T. 10.01.2024.
39. Göçmen, İlke, Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Direktiflerin Bireyler Arasındaki İlişkilere Etkileri, Yetkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2008.
40. Helsinki European Council, “Helsinki European Council 10 and 11 December 1999 Presidency Conclusions”, https://www.europarl.europa. eu/summits/hel1_en.htm, E.T. 19.09.2023.
41. Huck, Winfried, Sustainable Development Goals: Article-by-Article Commentary, Bloomsbury Publishing, United Kingdom 2022.
42. Kılıç, Muharrem, “İnsan Haklarının Kurumsallaşması: Ulusal İnsan Hakları Kurumları”, Türkiye İnsan Hakları ve Eşitlik Kurumu Akademik Dergisi, C. 5, S. 8, 2022, s. 15–60.
43. Lacatus, Corina, “Explaining Institutional Strength: The Case of National Human Rights I0nstitutions in Europe and its Neighbourhood”, Journal of European Public Policy, C. 26, S. 11, 2019, s. 1657–1677.
44. Lacatus, Corina, “Regulatory Networks and Regional Human Rights Governance: A Study of the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions”, International Relations, C. 36, S. 2, 2022, s. 192–213.
45. Lahuerta, Sara Benedi, “Equality Bodies: Advancing towards more Responsive Designs?”, International Journal of Law in Context, C. 17, S. 3, 2021, s. 390–412.
46. Langtry, David/Roberts Lyer, Kirsten, “Looking Forward—the Sub-Committee on Accreditation and National Human Rights Institutions”, National Human Rights Institutions: Rules, Requirements, and Practice, Editörler, David Langtry, Kirsten Roberts Lyer, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021, s. 335–345.
47. Langtry, David/Roberts Lyer, Kirsten, “The Operation of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation in Practice”, National Human Rights Institutions: Rules, Requirements and Practice, Editörler, David Langtry, Kirsten Roberts Lyer, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021, s. 43–79.
48. Linos, Katerina/Pegram, Tom, “Architects of Their own Making: National Human Rights Institutions and the United Nations”, Human Rights Quarterly, C. 38, S. 4, 2016, s. 1109–1134.
49. Linos, Katerina/Pegram, Tom, “What Works in Human Rights Institutions?”, American Journal of International Law, C. 111, S. 3, 2017, s. 628–688.
50. Meron, Theodor, “The Meaning and Reach of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”, The American Journal of International Law, C. 79, S. 2, 1985, s. 283–318.
51. Müller, Amrei/Seidensticker, Frauke, The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in the United Nations Treaty Body Process, Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte, Berlin 2007.
52. Polakiewicz, Jörg, “Council of Europe (COE)”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL], Editörler, Anne Peters, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019.
53. Prechal, Sacha, Directives in EC Law, 2d ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
54. Schmahl, Stefanie/Breuer, Marten, The Council of Europe: Its Laws and Policies, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
55. Takata, Hinako, “How are the Paris Principles on NHRIs Interpreted? Towards a Clear, Transparent, and Consistent Interpretative Framework”, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, C. 40, S. 2, 2022, s. 285–305.
56. T.C. Başbakanlık Avrupa Birliği Genel Sekreterliği, “Avrupa Birliği Antlaşması”, Avrupa Birliği Antlaşması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin İşleyişi Hakkında Antlaşma, Ofset Fotomat, Ankara 2011.
57. T.C. Başbakanlık Avrupa Birliği Genel Sekreterliği, “Avrupa Birliği’nin İşleyişi Hakkında Antlaşma”, Avrupa Birliği Antlaşması ve Avrupa Birliği’nin İşleyişi Hakkında Antlaşma, Ofset Fotomat, Ankara 2011.
58. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Avrupa Topluluğu ile İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü, Avrupa Topluluklarını Kuran Temel Antlaşmalar (AKÇT, AET, AAET): Cilt I, 1993.
59. The Council of the European Union, “Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32000L0043, E.T. 26.09.2023.
60. The Council of the European Union, “Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services”,https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32004L0113, E.T. 27.09.2023.
61. The European Commission, “Commission Recommendation (EU) 2018/951 of 22 June 2018 on Standards for Equality Bodies”, https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018H0951, E.T. 27.09.2023.
62. The European Parliament/The Council of the European Union, “Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32006L0054, E.T. 27.09.2023.
63. The European Parliament/The Council of the European Union, “Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0041, E.T. 27.09.2023.
64. UNDP Global Policy Centre For Governance, “SDG 16 Indicators”, https://www.sdg16hub.org/landing-page/sdg-16-indicators, E.T. 23.09.2023.
65. United Nations, Fact Sheet No.19: National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, United Nations Publications, Geneva 1993.
66. United Nations, National Human Rights Institutions: A Handbook on the Establishment and Strengthening of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, United Nations Publications, Geneva 1995. United Nations, National Human Rights Institutions: History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities, United Nations Publications, New York and Geneva 2010.
67. United Nations, “Member States”, https://www.un.org/en/aboutus/member-states#gotoT, E.T. 19.09.2023.
68. United Nations, “Status of Treaties - International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV 2&chapter=4&clang=_en, E.T. 19.09.2023.
69. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, “E/CN.4/RES/1992/54”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/144712, E.T. 22.09.2023.
70. United Nations Division of Human Rights, “ST/HR/SER.A/2”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/731550, E.T. 21.09.2023.
71. United Nations Economic and Socia Council, “E/RES/772(XXX)”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/213324?ln=en, E.T. 21.09.2023.
72. United Nations General Assembly, “A/RES/33/46”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/187219?ln=en, E.T. 22.09.2023.
73. United Nations General Assembly, “A/RES/48/134”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/180217?ln=en, E.T. 22.09.2023.
74. United Nations General Assembly, “A/RES/74/156”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3848627?ln=en, E.T. 22.09.2023.
75. United Nations General Assembly, “A/RES/76/170”, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3954952?ln=en, E.T. 22.09.2023.
76. United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles)”, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/principles-relating-status-national-institutions-paris, E.T. 19.09.2023.
77. United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/ instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial, E.T. 19.09.2023.
78. United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Ratification of 18 International Human Rights Treaties”, https://indicators.ohchr.org/, E.T. 20.09.2023.
79. United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT)”, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/optionalprotocol-convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel, E.T. 23.09.2023.
80. United Nations The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention- rights-persons-disabilities, E.T. 23.09.2023.
81. van Boven, Theo, “The Petition System under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law: Volume IV, Editörler, JA Frowein, R Wolfrum, Kluwer Law International, the Netherlands 2000, s. 271–287.
82. Wouters, Jan/Meuwissen, Katrien/Barros, Ana Sofia, “The European Union and National Human Rights Institutions”, National Human Right Institutions in Europe: Comparative, European and International Perspectives, Editörler. Jan Wouters, Katrien Meuwissen, Intersentia, Cambridge 2013, s. 187–221.