Turkish Rural Lifestyle Migrants to Muğla: A Qualitative Analysis of Video Narratives

Öz

Bu makalede, Türkiye'de büyük şehirlerden kırsala göç YouTube platformunda yayınlanan göç hikâyelerinin içerik analizine dayalı olarak, Muğla ili örneğinde, yaşam tarzı göçü yaklaşımıyla ele alınmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, büyük şehirlerde ağırlıklı olarak özel sektörde çalışan ve çoğu otuzlu yaşlarda olan bir grup insanın yeni bir hayata başlamak için işlerini bırakıp, kırsala göç ettiğini göstermiştir. Söz konusu göçmenlerin çoğu büyük şehirlerin istenmeyen koşullarından, şehir hayatının getirdiği olumsuz duygulardan ve yoğun iş baskısından kaçmakta ve Ege kıyılarının kırsal kesimlerinde doğa ve üretim merkezli bir yaşam aramaktadır. Sonuçlar, Covid-19'un da yeni bir motivasyon kaynağı olarak ortaya çıktığını göstermiştir. Kentin aksine, kırsalın olumlu özellikleri, özellikle bahçeli müstakil bir evde yaşama imkânı, kırsal alanların var olan olumlu imajını daha da güçlendirmiştir. Kırsal alanlar, sokağa çıkma yasağı durumunda özel bahçeleri sayesinde açık hava etkinliklerini ve maskesiz bir günlük yaşamı mümkün kıldığı için daha güvenli ve konforlu yerler olarak görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla, büyük şehirlerden kırsal alanlara göçün, pandemi ile daha da popüler bir eğilim haline geldiği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Muğla
• iç göç
• kırsal yaşam tarzı göçü
• Türkiye
• video anlatıları

Turkish Rural Lifestyle Migrants to Muğla: A Qualitative Analysis of Video Narratives

Öz

This article focuses on migration from big cities to the countryside in Turkey, in the case of Muğla province with a lifestyle migration lens, based on content analysis of the stories of migrants posted on the YouTube platform that provides a basis to increase digital migration research. Research results showed that a group of people who were mainly earlier in their life cycle and worked in the private sector in the big cities quitted their jobs to start a new life in the countryside. Most of them escape from the disliked characteristics of big cities, negative emotions caused by urban life and intense work pressure. They are in search of natural and production-centred life in rural areas of the Turkish Aegean. The results indicated that Covid-19 also emerged as a recent motivator. Contrary to the city, favourable features of the countryside, especially the possibility of living in a detached house with a garden, strengthened the positive image of the rural areas. They are seen as safer and more comfortable locations because in the case of a curfew, outdoor activities and a mask-free daily life would be possible due to the private gardens. Migration from big cities to rural areas seems to become a more popular trend with the pandemic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• internal migration
• lifestyle migration
• Turkey
• Muğla
• rural lifestyle migration
• video narratives

Kaynakça

1. Åkerlund, U. (2013). The best of both worlds: aspirations, drivers and practices of Swedish lifestyle movers in Malta. PhD diss., Umeå University.
2. Åkerlund, U., & Sandberg, L. (2015). Stories of lifestyle mobility: representing self and place in the search for the ‘good life’. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), 351-370. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.987806.
3. Bahar, O. (2008). Muğla turizminin türkiye ekonomisi açısından yeri ve önemi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2, 61-80.
4. Başaran-Uysal, A., & Sakarya, İ. (2012). Kırsal soylulaştırma ve turizmin kırsal yerleşimlere etkileri: Adatepe ve Yeşilyurt köyleri. Paper presented at Dünya Şehircilik Günü 36. Kolokyumu, Ankara, November 8.
5. Başaran-Uysal, A. (2017). Kırsalda koruma ve soylulaştırma ikilemi. Ege Mimarlık 2, 36-39. Retrieved from http://egemimarlik.org/96/6.pdf.
6. Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. 2009. Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review 57(4), 608-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01864.x
7. Benson, M. (2011a). The British in rural France lifestyle migration and the ongoing guest for a better way of life (first edition). Manchester University Press.
8. Benson, M. (2011b). The movement beyond (lifestyle) migration: mobile practices and the constitution of a better way of life. Mobilities, 6(2): 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552901.

9. Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. (2016). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration: categories, concepts and ways of thinking. Migration Studies, 4(1): 20-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnv015
10. Berry, B.J.L. (1976). The counter-urbanization process: urban America since 1970. Urban Affairs Annual Review, 11,17-30.
11. Bijker, R. A., & Haartsen, T. (2012). More than counter-urbanisation: migration to popular and less-popular rural areas in the Netherlands. Population Space and Place, 18(5), 643-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.687
12. Buller, H., & Hoggart, K. (1994). International counter-urbanization: British migrants in rural France (first edition). Avebury.
13. Budan, P. (2015). The impasse of urban to rural migration: re-enchantment and disillusionment in Şirince. Master diss., Sabancı University. İstanbul.
14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77-101.
15. Camarero, L.A., & Oliva, J. (2002). Urban sprawl, rural turnaround and the changing shape of utopia. Paper presented at Xıııth World Congress of the International Economic History, Buenos Aires.
16. Cresswell, T. (2009). “Place”. In R. Kitchin & N. J. Thrift (Eds.) International encyclopedia of human geography, Elsevier.
17. Deniz, A., & Şahin, S. S. (2022). Locked at home and escape from home: transformation of older women's daily life during the Covıd 19 Pandemic. In Südaş, İ., Çağın, Ş., & Maktal-Canko, D. (Eds.), Perspectıves In Gender Studıes Space & History & Art, (1-16). Ege University Publications.
18. Eimermann, M., Lundmark, M., & Muller, D.K. (2012). Exploring Dutch migration to rural Sweden: international counter-urbanisation in the Eu”. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 103(3): 330-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00696.x
19. Eimermann, M. (2015). Lifestyle migration to the north: dutch families and the decision to move to rural Sweden. Popul. Space Place, 21(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1807
20. Ermiş, S. (2022). Profili, motivasyonu ve yer seçimi bakımından yaşlı göçleri: Datça (Muğla) örneği. Master dissertation, Süleyman Demirel University. Isparta
21. Gaspar, S. (2015). In search of the rural idyll: lifestyle migrants across the EU”. In Torkington, K., David, I., Sardinha, J. (Eds.), Practising the goodlife – lifestyle migration in practices (14-32). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
22. Griffiths, D., & Maile, S. (2014) Britons in berlin: imagined cityscapes, affective encounters and the cultivation of the self. In Michaela Benson & Nick Osbaldiston (Eds.), Understanding lifestyle migration: theoretical approaches to migration and the quest for a better way of life (139-162). Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? british counter-cultural back-to the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph609oa
24. Halfacree, K. (2007). Back-to-the-land in the twenty-first century-making connections with rurality. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00371.x
25. Halfacree, K. H, & Rivera, M. J. (2012). moving to the countryside ... and staying: lives beyond representations. Sociologia Ruralis, 52 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00556.x
26. Halfacree K. (2014). Jumping up from the armchair: beyond the idyll in counterurbanisation. In Benson M., & Osbaldiston (Eds.) Understanding lifestyle migration. migration, diasporas and citizenship series. Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Halliday, J., & Coombest, M. (1995). In search of counterurbanisation: some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(4), 433-446. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1.
28. Hedberg, C., & Haandrikman, K. (2014). Repopulation of the Swedish countryside: globalisation by international migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.005
29. Jobes, P. C. (2000). Moving nearer to heaven: the illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. Praeger.
30. Jones, R.E., Fly, J.M., Talley, J., & Cordell, H. K. (2003). Green migration into rural America: the new frontier of environmentalism? Society &Natural Resources, 16(3), 221-238. 10.1080/08941920309159
31. King, R., Cela, E., Fokkema, T., & Morettini, G. (2021). International retirement and later-life migrants in the Marche region, Italy: materialities of landscape, ‘home’, lifestyle and consumption. Ageing and Society, 41(6), 1267-1288. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20001233
32. Kozinets, R.V. (2006). Click to connect: Netnography and tribal advertising. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 279-288. doi:10.2501/S0021849906060338
33. Kozinets, R.V., Pierre-Yann, D., & Amanda, E. (2014). Netnographic analysis: understanding culture through social media data. In Uwe F (Ed.), Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (262-275). Sage.
34. Kozinets, R.V. (2015). Netnography: understanding networked communication society. In Anabel QH & Luke S (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society.
35. Korpela, M. (2019). Searching for a countercultural life abroad: neo-nomadism, lifestyle mobility or bohemian lifestyle migration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(15), 3352 3369.Doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1569505.
36. Krivokapic-Skoko, B., & Collins, J. (2016) looking for rural idyll ‘down under’: international immigrants in rural Australia. International Migration, 54 (1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12174.
37. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage.
38. Leebrick, R.A. (2015). Environmental gentrification and development in a rural Appalachian community: blending critical theory and ethnography. Doctoral diss., University of Tennessee.
39. Leurs K., M. Prabhakar. (2018). Doing digital migration studies: methodological considerations for an emerging research focus. In Zapata-Barrero R., & Yalaz E (Eds.), qualitative research in European migration studies (247-266). Springer.
40. Lee, E. S. (1966). A Theory of Migration. Demography 3(1), 47-57.
41. Matthews, H., Taylor, M., Sherwood, K., Tucker, F. Limb, M. (2000). Growing-up in the countryside: children and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies 16, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00059-5.
42. Mirza-Baş, S. (2019). Yeni bir göç modeli olarak kentten tersine göç: İstanbul incelemesi. Master diss., Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi.
43. Osbaldiston, N. 2011. The authentic place in the amenity migration discourse. Space and Culture, 14(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331210392700.
44. Osbaldiston, N., Picken, F., & Denny, L. (2020). exploring emotional reflexivity in British lifestyle migration to Australia. Population Space Place, 26(5), https://doi.org/10. 1002/psp.2328
45. O' Reilly, K. (2007). Emerging tourism futures: residential tourism and its implications. In Geoffroy, C. & Sibley, R. (Eds.), Going abroad: travel, tourism, and migration. cross-cultural perspectives on mobility (144-157). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
46. Özadak, A. (2016). Köye geri dönüş”: Türkiye’deki ekolojik çiftliklerde birlikte yaşam deneyimleri ve yeni köylülük. Master diss., İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi. İstanbul.
47. Özkan, O. (2019). Emekli göçmenlerin yaşadıkları yöreye ilişkin mekânsal algıları: Kaz Dağı Milli Parkı Çevresi (Balıkesir) Örneği. Master diss., Balıkesir Universitesi. Balıkesir.
48. Rivera-Escribano, M. J. (2007). Migration to rural Navarre: questioning the experience of counter-urbanisation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00374.x
49. Rivera-Escribano, M.J., & Mormont, M. (2006). Neo-rurality and the different meanings of the countryside. Paper presented at Les mondes ruraux à l’épreuve des sciences sociales, Dijon, mai 17-19.
50. Simonsen, K. (2008). Place as encounters: practice, conjunction and co-existence. In Jørgen Ole-Bærenholdt & Brynhıld Granås (Eds.), Mobility and place enacting Northern European peripheries (13-27). Ashgate Publishing Limited.
51. Solana-Solana, M. (2010). Rural gentrification in Catalonia, Spain: a case study of migration, social change and conflicts in the Empordanet Area. Geoforum, 41(3), 508-517.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.005
52. Südaş, İ. (2019). Şehirden Kopuş mu? Değişen İzmir’de Köylere Göç (1.b). Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları. Simonsen, K. (2008). Place as encounters: practice, conjunction and co-existence. In Jørgen Ole-Bærenholdt & Brynhıld Granås (Eds.), Mobility and place enacting Northern European peripheries (13-27). Ashgate Publishing Limited.
53. Stockdale, A. (2010). The diverse geographies of rural gentrification in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.04.001
54. Stone, I., & Stubbs, C. (2007). Enterprising expatriates: lifestyle migration and entrepreneurship in rural Southern Europe. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development ,19(5), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701552389
55. Terkenli, T. S. (2001). Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape and Urban Planning 57, 197-208.
56. Torkington, K. (2011). The discursive construction of place-identity: British lifestyle migrants in the Algarve. Doctoral diss., Lancaster University.
57. Torkington, K. (2012). Place and lifestyle migration: the discursive construction of ‘global’place-identity. Mobilities, 7(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.631812
58. Tümertekin, E., & Özgüç, N. (2019). Beşeri Coğrafya: İnsan, Kültür, Mekân (15th edition). Çantay Kitapevi.
59. Weidinger, T., & Kordel, S. (2016). Intra-European lifestyle migration of German (pre)retirees to rural Spain: a contribution to rural development in times of the financial and real-estate crisis? the migrant’s point of view. In Grabski-Kieron, U., Mose, I., Reichert-Schick, A. & Steinführer (Eds.), European rural peripheries revalued: governance, actors, impacts (248–271). LIT Verlag.
60. Yörür, N., Uysal, D., & Altınörs-Çırak, A. (2018). Selimiye yerleşmesinde turizm eksenli dönüşümün kırsal doku ve mimari yapıya etkileri. Ege Mimarlık, 1(2), 24-29.
61. Zoğal, V., & Emekli, G. (2020). “The changing meanings of second homes during Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey”. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE) 42, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.741471
62. Zhang, Y., & Hitchcock, M.J. (2017). The Chinese female tourist gaze: a netnography of young women's blogs on Macao. Current Issues in Tourism, 20, 315-330. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2014.904845.