Examining the Relationship Between Digital Device Usage Time, Digital Stress, and Digital Burnout Among University Students

Öz

This study aims to examine the relationship between university students’ digital device usage time and their levels of digital stress and digital burnout. The research, conducted using a correlational survey design, included a total of 338 students (223 females and 115 males) enrolled in various universities during the 2024–2025 academic year. The data collection instruments were the Multidimensional Digital Stress Scale, the Digital Burnout Scale, and a Personal Information Form. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses. The findings revealed a positive and low-level significant relationship between digital device usage time and digital stress. However, no statistically significant relationship was found between device usage time and digital burnout. This result suggests that intensive use of digital devices may cause digital stress in the short term, but longer-term and chronic use may be required for it to evolve into burnout. The findings highlight the importance of developing interventions aimed at reducing digital stress among university students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital stress
• Digital burnout
• University students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Dijital Cihaz Kullanım Süresi ile Dijital Stres ve Dijital Tükenmişlik Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital cihaz kullanım süresi ile dijital stres ve dijital tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlişkisel tarama deseni ile yürütülen araştırmada 2024–2025 eğitim yılında farklı üniversitelerde öğrenim gören toplam 338 öğrenci (223 kadın, 115 erkek) yer almıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Çok Boyutlu Dijital Stres Ölçeği, Dijital Tükenmişlik Ölçeği ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Veriler Pearson çarpım momentler korelasyonu ve çoklu regresyon analizleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, dijital cihaz kullanım süresi ile dijital stres arasında pozitif ve düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak cihaz kullanım süresi ile dijital tükenmişlik arasında istatistikî olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır. Bu sonuç, dijital cihazların yoğun kullanımının kısa vadede dijital stres oluşturabileceğini, ancak tükenmişliğe dönüşmesi için daha uzun süreli ve kronik kullanım gerektiğini düşündürmektedir. Bulgular, üniversite öğrencilerinde dijital stresin azaltılmasına yönelik müdahalelerin geliştirilmesinin önemini vurgular.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital stres
• Dijital tükenmişlik
• Üniversite öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057
2. Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., ve Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: Developing a typology of person-specific effect patterns. Communication Research, 47(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196
3. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Çakmak Tolan, Ö., ve Karahan, S. (2022). The relationship between nomophobia and depression, anxiety and stress levels of university students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.1.559
5. Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., ve Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
6. Durmuş, S. Ç., Gülnar, E., ve Özveren, H. (2022). Determining digital burnout in nursing students: A descriptive research study. Nurse Education Today, 111, 105300. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105300
7. Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., ve Hall, B. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079
8. Erinç, Z. Ö. (2023). Çok boyutlu dijital stres ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlilik güvenilirlik çalışması (Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.

9. Erten, P., ve Özdemir, O. (2020). The digital burnout scale development study. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 668–683. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.597890
10. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., ve Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
12. Fraenkel, J. R., ve Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13. Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı. (2023). Türkiye gençlik araştırması 2023. Ankara: Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı Yayınları.
14. Göldağ, B. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between university students' digital burnout levels and perceived stress levels. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 90–98. DOI: 10.53850/joltida.958039
15. Hall, J. A., Steele, R. G., Christofferson, J. L., ve Mihailova, T. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of a multidimensional digital stress scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 230–245. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000979 Hefner, D., ve Vorderer, P. (2016). Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitasking. In L. Reinecke ve M.
16. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Routledge. İslamoğlu, A. H., ve Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
17. Karaahmetoğlu, G. U., ve Arabacı, Z. (2024). University Students’ Problematic Mobile Phone Use. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 14(2), 177-185. DOI: 10.5961/higheredusci.1315316
18. Karakoç, M., ve Keşim, D. A. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinde ekran süresinin boyun hareketleri, ağrı düzeyi, yaşam kalitesi ve duygu durumu üzerine etkisi. Dicle Medical Journal, 50(1), 102–109. DOI: 10.5798/dicletip.1267184
19. Kıvrak, A. O. (2021). Examination of university students' nomophobia, coping with stress, and anger expression styles. Selçuk University. DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs211572210
20. Korkmaz, Z. (2019). Dijital teknolojileri kullanım alışkanlıkları ve sosyalleşme: İlkokul öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
21. Kumar, P. S. (2024). Technostress: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475.
22. Kuslu, S., ve Eminoğlu, A. (2024). The relationship between digital burnout levels of nursing students and their professional self-efficacy. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 17(2), 909–920.
23. Kuss, D. J., ve Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(3), 311. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030311
24. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., ve Neter, J. (2004). Applied linear regression models. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Loh, X. K., Lee, V. H., Loh, X. M., Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., ve Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The dark side of mobile learning via social media. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10202-z
25. LaRose, R., Connolly, R., Lee, H., Li, K., ve Hales, K. D. (2014). Connection overload? A cross-cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Information Systems Management, 31(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.854097
26. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Lewandowsky, S., Sunstein, C. R., ve Hertwig, R. (2020). How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1102-1109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0889-7
27. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., ve Weitzel, T. (2015). Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.3
28. Malik, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., ve Johri, A. (2020). Correlates of social media fatigue and academic performance decrement: A large cross-sectional study. Information Technology ve People, 34(2), 557-580. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2019-0289
29. Marrinhas, D., Santos, V., Salvado, C., Pedrosa, D., ve Pereira, A. (2023). Burnout and technostress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The perception of higher education teachers and researchers. Frontiers in Education, 8, a1144220. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1144220
30. McCarthy, E. (2020). The growing problem with digital burnout. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from https://www.itstimetologoff.com/2021/03/26/the-growing-problem-withdigitalburnout/
31. Mencik, A. (2019). Genç tüketicilerin sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları ve marka tercihleri arasındaki ilişki: Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
32. Montag, C., ve Walla, P. (2016). Carpe diem instead of losing your social mind: Beyond digital addiction and why we all suffer from digital overuse. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1157281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1157281
33. Naz, I., ve Qamar, A. (2025). The silent strains and blurred minds: a study of digital screen time, mental fatigue and brain fog among university students. Journal of Regional Studies Review, 4(2), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.62843/jrsr/2025.4b111
34. Özyılmaz, A. F. (2021). Bilgi çağında madalyonun diğer yüzü: Dijital stres. MEYAD Akademi, 2(2), 163–171. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. London: Routledge.
35. Quill, M. (2017). The harmful effects of digital burnout on organizational effectiveness. Retrieved February 18, 2024, from http://www.tmsconsulting.com.au/harmful-effects-digitalburnoutorganisational-effectiveness/
36. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., ve Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
37. Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., ve Quiring, O. (2017). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
38. Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., ve Müller, K. W. (2016). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
39. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., ve Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
40. Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., ve Koskelainen, T. (2019). Technostress and social networking services: Explaining users’ concentration, sleep, identity, and social relation problems. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 408–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12213
41. Sonnentag, S. (2012). Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: The benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411434979
42. Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
43. Thomée, S. (2018). Mobile phone use and mental health: A review of the research that takes a psychological perspective on exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122692
44. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2024). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması 2024. Ankara: TÜİK.
45. Twenge, J. M., ve Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
46. Upadhyaya, P., ve Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1647-1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10319-9 Vorderer, P., ve Kohring, M. (2013). Permanently online: A challenge for media and communication research. International Journal of Communication, 7, 188–196.
47. We Are Social ve Meltwater. (2024). Digital 2024: Turkey. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com
48. Weinstein, A., ve Lejoyeux, M. (2010). Internet addiction or excessive internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2010.491880
49. Wimmer, J., & Waldenburger, L. (2020). Digital stress in everyday life. Paper presented at AoIR 2020: The 21st Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, October 27–31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11364
50. Yalçın, C. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi: Selçuk Üniversitesi örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Radyo Televizyon ve Sinema ABD). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.