Prevalence of Peer Bullying among Adolescents in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and Determination of Affecting Factors

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of peer bullying among adolescents the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) and the factors affecting it. The research is descriptive type research. The target population of the study comprises 3016 students who study in the Famagusta district of TRNC during 2018-2019 academic year. A sample of this research was detected by using the stratification sample method. In this study used, peer bullying scale was used for students developed by Olweus. It was detected that male students are both victims and bullies in peer bullying more than female students; vocational high school students are more victims of peer bullying than other students; 6th and 7th grade students and students who do not live with their parents are more victims. The study found that students who had bad relationships with their parents were more likely to become bullies. Nurses must observe the main reason for this problem by visiting both victim and bully students’ houses.

Keywords

• Peer-bullying
• adolescent
• bully
• victim

Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti'nde Ergenler Arasında Akran Zorbalığının Yaygınlığı ve Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti'ndeki (KKTC) ergenler arasında akran zorbalığının yaygınlığını ve bunu etkileyen faktörleri araştırmaktır. Araştırma tanımlayıcı tipte bir araştırmadır. Araştırmanın hedef evrenini 2018-2019 eğitim-öğretim yılında KKTC'nin Gazimağusa ilçesinde öğrenim gören 3016 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi tabakalandırma örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak oluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışmada Olweus tarafından geliştirilen Öğrencilere Yönelik Akran Zorbalığı Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularında, akran zorbalığında erkek öğrencilerin kız öğrencilere göre daha fazla hem mağdur hem de zorba oldukları; meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin diğer öğrencilere göre daha fazla akran zorbalığı mağduru olduğu; 6. ve 7. sınıf öğrencilerin ve ebeveynleri ile birlikte yaşamayan öğrencilerin daha fazla mağdur olduğu saptandı. Çalışmada ebeveynleriyle kötü ilişkileri olan öğrencilerin daha çok zorba oldukları tespit edildi. Hemşireler hem mağdur hem de zorba öğrencilerin evlerini ziyaret ederek bu sorunun temel nedenini gözlemlemelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akran zorbalığı
• ergen
• zorbalık
• kurban

Kaynakça

1. Alikaşifoğlu, M. (2011). Peer bullying. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, 46(11), 31-34.
2. Beane, A. L. (2009). Bullying prevention for schools: A step-by-step guide to implementing a succesful anti-bullying program. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, USA
3. Cox, A. K. (2014). Bullying. The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1-3.
4. Çivilidağ, A., & Cooper, H. T. (2013). A study on the investigation of cyber bully and anger in adolescents: the case of Niğde province. International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 497-511.
5. Delprato, M., Akyeampong, K., & Dunne, M. (2017). The impact of bullying on students’ learning in Latin America: A matching approach for 15 countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 37-57.
6. Dorio, N.B., Clark, K., Demaray,M.K.,&Doll, E.M. (2020). School Climate Counts: A Longitudinal Analysis of School Climate and Middle School Bullying Behaviors. Internatıonal Journal of Bullying Prevention 2(1):1-17.
7. Drubina, B., Kökönyei, G., Várnai, D. et al. Online and school bullying roles: are bully-victims more vulnerable in nonsuicidal self-injury and in psychological symptoms than bullies and victims?. BMC Psychiatry 23, 945 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05341-3.
8. Drubina, B., Kökönyei, G., Várnai, D. et al. Online and school bullying roles: are bully-victims more vulnerable in nonsuicidal self-injury and in psychological symptoms than bullies and victims?. BMC Psychiatry 23, 945 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05341-3

9. Gençoğlu, C., Kumcağız, H., & Ersanlı, K. (2014). Family factors affecting adolescents' tendency to violence. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(2).
10. Küçükkaragöz, H. (2018). Cognitive development and language development. Pegem Citation Indeks, 83-121. Lucas, S., Jernbro, C., Tindberg, Y., & Janson, S. (2016). Bully, bullied and abused. Associations between violence at home and bullying in childhood. Scandinavian journal of public health, 44(1), 27-35.
11. Menesini, E., Salmivalli. (2017). Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22(sup1):1-14.
12. Mercan, H., Sarı, H.Y., (2018). Peer bullying and relationship between sociodemographic characteristics of high school students. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing; 26(1): 21-29.
13. Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. University of Berge., Research Center for Health Promotion.
14. Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual review of clinical psychology, 9, 751-780.
15. Özdemir, M., & Bayram Özdemir, S. (2017). The role of school context in adolescents’ attitudes toward immigrants and interethnic friendships. In E. Lundberg (Ed.), Toleransens mekanismer: en antologi/The mechanisms of tolerance: An anthology. Stockholm: Forum för levande historia/The Living History Forum
16. Özdemir, O., Özdemir, P. G., Kadak, M. T., & Nasıroğlu, S. (2012). Personality development. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 4(4), 566-589.
17. Panayiotis, S., Anna, P., Charalambos, T., & Chrysostomos, L. (2010). Prevalence of bullying among Cyprus elementary and high school students. International Journal of Violence and School, 11, 114-128.
18. Patel, H. A., Varma, J., Shah, S., Phatak, A., & Nimbalkar, S. M. (2017). Profile of bullies and victims among urban school-going adolescents in Gujarat. Indian pediatrics, 54(10), 841-843.
19. Peker, A., Eroğlu, Y., & Ada, Ş. (2012). Examining the predictors of cyber bullying and victimization in adolescents. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal. 12(2):185-206.
20. Sarı, C., Demirbağ B.C., (2019). Evaluation of peer bullying in terms of sociodemographic variables in primary and secondary school students: district case. Journal Of Publıc Health Nursıng :1(3):119-131.
21. Sarı, E., Arslantaş H. (2018). Adolescence delinquency. Archives Medical Review Journal, 27(4):397-413.
22. Sezen, M.F., Murat, M. (2018). Examination of The Relationship Between The Bullying in Adolescents, Internet Addiction and Levels of Emotional Intelligence. OPUS-International Journal of Society Researches : 9(16): 160-182.
23. Silva, L., Komatsu, A.V., Zequınao, M.A., Pereira, B.O., Wang, G.Y., &Silva, M.A.I. (2019). Bullying, social skills, peer acceptance, and friendship among students in school transition. Estud. psicol. I Campinas I 36 I e180060 :1-10.
24. Smith, P. K. (2016). Bullying: Definition, types, causes, consequences and intervention. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 519-532.
25. Şahin, S.S., Ayaz-Alkaya,S. (2023). Prevalance and predisposing factors of peer bullying and cyberbullying among adolescent: A cross-sectinal study. Children and Youth Services Review. Vol:155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107216
26. Tıpırdamaz Sipahi H, Karababa AO. Adaptation of Olweus peer bullying survey for students to Turkish and Turkey and validity and reliability analysis. Journal of Ege Medicine. 2018;57(4):222-7.
27. Tural, H. S., & Yeşilova, H. (2015). High school students' emotions, thoughts and attitudes towards bullying and bullies. Anatolian Journal Of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16(4).
28. Yurtal, F., & Cenkseven, F. (2016). The prevalence and nature of bullying in primary schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 3 (28).