Teletıp Temelli Rehabilitasyon: Kanıtlar, Uygulamalar ve Yenilikçi Teknolojiler

Öz

Amaç: Bu anlatımsal derleme, klinik etkinlik, yaygın olarak kullanılan teknolojiler ve uygulamayı etkileyen temel metodolojik ve eşitlikle ilgili engellere odaklanarak, telesağlık tabanlı fizyoterapi ve telerehabilitasyonla ilgili mevcut kanıtları sentezlemektedir. Gereç ve Yöntem: İnceleme, uluslararası kanıt sentezi standartlarına uygun olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro ve CINAHL'da, 2020-2025 yılları arasında yayınlanan, telesağlık ve dijital fizyoterapi ile ilgili MeSH terimleri ve anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak kapsamlı aramalar yapılmıştır. Uygun çalışmalar arasında sistematik incelemeler, randomize çalışmalar, gözlemsel araştırmalar, metodolojik değerlendirmeler ve nitel çalışmalar yer almıştır. Rehabilitasyon dışı ve düşük kaliteli çalışmalar hariç tutulmuştur. Heterojenlik nedeniyle, bulgular tematik olarak entegre edilmiştir. Bulgular: Kas-iskelet, nörolojik, kardiyopulmoner, pediatrik ve geriatrik popülasyonlarda, telerehabilitasyon, özellikle egzersiz ve eğitim temelli müdahaleler için, yüz yüze fizyoterapi ile karşılaştırılabilir güvenlik ve klinik etkinlik göstermektedir. Video, giyilebilir cihazlar ve yapay zeka araçları kullanılarak yapılan uzaktan fonksiyonel değerlendirmeler güçlü bir geçerlilik göstermektedir. Ancak, tutarsız protokoller, küçük örneklemler ve sınırlı takip, genelleştirilebilirliği kısıtlamaktadır. Dijital eşitsizlikler, teknolojik engeller ve yaşlı veya okuryazarlık düzeyi düşük kullanıcılar arasındaki zorluklar devam etmektedir. Hibrit modeller, karmaşık vakalar için sonuçları iyileştirirken, yapılandırılmış ilerleme, klinisyen geri bildirimi ve kullanıcı dostu platformlar başarı için kritik öneme sahiptir. Sonuç: Telesağlık ve telerehabilitasyon, modern fizyoterapinin giderek daha önemli bileşenleri haline gelmekte olup, erişilebilir ve uygun koşullar altında etkili bir bakım sunmaktadır. Mevcut kanıtlar, belirli hasta grupları ve müdahale türleri için geleneksel rehabilitasyonla karşılaştırılabilir sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır; özellikle yeterli teknolojik altyapı ve klinik gözetim altında uygulanan yapılandırılmış, egzersiz temelli programlar bu açıdan öne çıkmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, metodolojik farklılıklar, sınırlı uzun vadeli veriler ve dijital erişimdaki eşitsizlikler, bu bulguların daha geniş bir kitleye genellenmesini engellemektedir. Gelişmekte olan YZ, sanal gerçeklik/artırılmış gerçeklik araçları ve hibrit modeller, daha fazla kontrollü ve uzun vadeli araştırma sonuçları beklenmek kaydıyla, tele-sağlık destekli fizyoterapinin ilerlemesi açısından umut vaat etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uzaktan konsültasyon
• teletıp
• telerehabilitasyon
• sanal gerçeklik maruz kalma terapisi
• giyilebilir elektronik cihazlar

Telemedicine-Based Rehabilitation: Evidence, Applications and Innovative Technologies

Öz

Objective: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on telehealth-based physiotherapy and telerehabilitation, focusing on clinical effectiveness, commonly used technologies, and key methodological and equity-related barriers affecting implementation.
Material and methods: The review followed international evidence-synthesis standards. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and CINAHL for studies published between 2020–2025 using MeSH terms and keywords related to telehealth and digital physiotherapy. Eligible studies included systematic reviews, randomized trials, observational research, methodological evaluations, and qualitative studies. Non-rehabilitation and low-quality studies were excluded. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were integrated thematically.
Findings: Across musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiopulmonary, pediatric, and geriatric populations, telerehabilitation demonstrates safety and clinical effectiveness comparable to in-person physiotherapy, especially for exercise and education-based interventions. Remote functional assessments using video, wearables, and AI tools show strong validity. However, inconsistent protocols, small samples, and limited follow-up restrict generalizability. Digital inequities, technological barriers, and challenges among older or low-literacy users persist. Hybrid models enhance outcomes for complex cases, while structured progression, clinician feedback, and user-friendly platforms are critical for success.
Conclusion: Telehealth and telerehabilitation represent increasingly important components of modern physiotherapy, offering accessible and, under appropriate conditions, effective care. Current evidence indicates outcomes comparable to traditional rehabilitation for selected populations and intervention types, particularly structured, exercise-based programs delivered with adequate technological infrastructure and clinical supervision, although methodological heterogeneity, limited long-term data, and digital access gaps constrain broader generalization. Emerging AI, VR/AR tools, and hybrid models hold promise for advancing telehealth-supported physiotherapy, pending further controlled, long-term research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Remote consultation
• telemedicine
• telerehabilitation
• virtual reality exposure therapy
• wearable electronic devices.

Kaynakça

1. Anderson M, Bauer N. Beyond the clinic: virtual care as the future of long covid rehabilitation. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2025;36(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1097/cpt.0000000000000278.
2. Bernhardsson S, Larsson A, Bergenheim A, Ho-Henriksson C, Ekhammar A, Lange E, et al. Digital physiotherapy assessment vs conventional face-to-face physiotherapy assessment of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0283013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283013.
3. Brigo E, Rintala A, Kossi O, Verwaest F, Vanhoof O, Feys P, et al. Using telehealth to guarantee the continuity of rehabilitation during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10325. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610325.
4. Calcaterra V, Marin L, Guardamagna L, Gatti A, Rossi V, Patané P, et al. Home-based telerehabilitation for pediatric neurological motor disorders: current trends and future perspectives. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digital Health. 2025;11. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251357504.
5. Cottrell M, Russell T. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102193. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102193.
6. Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O'Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(5):625-638. DOI: 10.1177/0269215516645148.
7. Davies L, Lawton V, Bevan R, Mestousis M, Pacey V. Informing the development of telehealth education in physiotherapy programs. assessments and interventions for individuals accessing physiotherapy care via synchronous telehealth. a scoping review. Musculoskelet Care. 2025;23(1). DOI: 10.1002/msc.70039.
8. Dawson R, Oliveira J, Kwok W, Bratland M, Rajendran I, Srinivasan A, et al. Exercise interventions delivered through telehealth to improve physical functioning for older adults with frailty, cognitive, or mobility disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Telemed E Health. 2024;30(4):940-950. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0177.

9. Delbaere K, Sherrington C, Said C, Naganathan V. Innovative approaches to fall prevention in community‐dwelling older adults. Med J Aust. 2025;223(4):174-176. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52714.
10. Eryilmaz MC. (2026a) Integrated Technologies in Neurorehabilitation: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives. SABİTED. 2026;6(1):72-85.
11. Eryilmaz MC. (2026b) Integration of Genetic, Epigenetic and Artificial Intelligence-Based Biomarkers in Personalized Exercise Prescription. Türkiye Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2026;9(1):14-28. DOI: 10.51536/tusbad.1817230.
12. Garofano M, Vecchione C, Calabrese M, Rusciano M, Visco V, Granata G, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a cardiac telerehabilitation program in chronic heart failure: design and rationale of the telerehab-hf study. Healthcare. 2025;13(16):2074. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13162074.
13. Goldman J, Merkitch D, Brewington D, Peirce H, Rho M, Jayabalan P, et al. Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: identifying opportunities for remote care. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1049554.
14. Hall J, Luechtefeld, J, Woods, M. Adoption of telehealth by pediatric physical therapists during covid-19: a survey study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2021;33(4):237-244. DOI: 10.1097/pep.0000000000000817.
15. Hansen H, Bieler T, Beyer N, Kallemose T, Wilcke JT, Østergaard LM, et al. Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial. Thorax. 2020;75(5):413-421. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214246.
16. Hudon A, Miciak M, Slade T, Lovo S, Whittaker JL, Côté D, et al. What are the perceptions and lived experiences of Canadian injured workers about the provision of physiotherapy services using telerehabilitation? J Occup Rehabil. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10261-4.
17. Hurley E, Haskel J, Bloom D, Gonzalez‐Lomas G, Jazrawi L, Bosco J, et al. The use and acceptance of telemedicine in orthopedic surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. Telemed E Health. 2021;27(6):657-662. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0255.
18. Jansson M, Rantala A, Miettunen J, Puhto A, Pikkarainen M. The effects and safety of telerehabilitation in patients with lower-limb joint replacement: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;28(2):96-114. DOI: 10.1177/1357633x20917868. Jourdan T, Debs N, Frindel C. The contribution of machine learning in the validation of commercial wearable sensors for gait monitoring in patients: a systematic review. Sensors. 2021;21(14):4808. DOI: 10.3390/s21144808.
19. Kudritzki V, Howard I. Telehealth-based exercise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2023;14. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1238916.
20. Laver K, Adey‐Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin N, George S, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2020(1). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010255.pub3.
21. Leavitt V, Aguerre I, Lee N, Riley C, Jager P, Bloom S. Rct of a telehealth group-based intervention to increase physical activity in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin Pract. 2021;11(4):291-297. DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000001039.
22. Lee A, Tilley L, Baenziger S, Hoy R, Glaspole I. The perceptions of telehealth physiotherapy for people with bronchiectasis during a global pandemic a qualitative study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1315. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051315.
23. Leochico C, Austria E, Gelisanga M, Ignacio S, Mojica J. Home-based telerehabilitation for community-dwelling persons with stroke during the covid-19 pandemic: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2023;55:jrm4405. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.4405.
24. Leochico C, Espiritu A, Ignacio S, Mojica J. Challenges to the emergence of telerehabilitation in a developing country: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2020;11. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01007.
25. Maresca G, Maggio M, Luca R, Manuli A, Tonin P, Pignolo L, et al. Tele-neuro-rehabilitation in italy: state of the art and future perspectives. Front Neurol. 2020;11. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.563375.
26. McKeon J, Alvarez P, Vajapey A, Sarac N, Spitzer A, Vajapey S. Expanding role of technology in rehabilitation after lower-extremity joint replacement. JBJS Rev. 2021;9(9). DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.21.00016. Mulder M, Nikamp C, Nijland R, Wegen E, Prinsen E, Vloothuis J, et al. Can telerehabilitation services combined with caregiver-mediated exercises improve early supported discharge services poststroke? a study protocol for a multicentre, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2022;22(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02533-w.
27. Nguyen G, King K, Stirling L. Telerehabilitation use and experiences in occupational and physical therapy through the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0291605. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291605.
28. Oh D, To D, Corso M, Murnaghan K, Yu H, Cancelliere C. Agreement and concurrent validity between telehealth and in-person diagnosis of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2024;32(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00542-3.
29. Özsoy G, Yılmaz H, Doğan N. Reliability of tele-assessment of performance-based tests in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Karya J Health Sci. 2025;6(2):55-60. DOI: 10.52831/kjhs.1640571.
30. Rauzi M, Olivos M, Currier D, Abbate L, Lum H, Stevens‐Lapsley J. Emergency management during telehealth. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2023;39(4):266-279. DOI: 10.1097/tgr.0000000000000410.
31. Raymond M, Christie L, Kramer S, Malaguti C, Mok Z, Gardner B, et al. Delivery of allied health interventions using telehealth modalities: a rapid systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Healthcare. 2024;12(12):1217. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121217.
32. Rocco P, Reátegui-Rivera C, Finkelstein J. Telemedicine applications for cancer rehabilitation: scoping review. JMIR Cancer. 2024;10:e56969. DOI: 10.2196/56969.
33. Roitenberg N, Ami N. Qualitative exploration of physical therapists' experiences providing telehealth physical therapy during covid-19. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023;66:102789. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102789.
34. Saeed S, Singhal M, Kaur K, Shannawaz M, Koul A, Arora K, et al. Acceptability and satisfaction of patients and providers with telemedicine during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56308.
35. Scott-Richardson M, Johnson G, Burnett S, Giordano N, Highland K. Policy facilitators versus structural barriers: integrative therapy telehealth changes in the united states during the covid-19 pandemic. Telemed E Health. 2022;28(5):728-735. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0167.
36. Seron P, Oliveros MJ, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro RC, Merino-Osorio C, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab053. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab053.
37. Shi W, Zhang Y, Bian Y, Chen L, Yuan W, Zhang H, et al. The physical and psychological effects of telerehabilitation-based exercise for patients with nonspecific low back pain: prospective randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024;12:e56580-e56580. DOI: 10.2196/56580.
38. Siwach P, Pawaria S, Bajaj R, Sachdeva S. Patient adherence in telehealth: a comparative analysis with conventional outpatient services. Musculoskelet Care. 2025;23(2). DOI: 10.1002/msc.70137.
39. Stawicki S, Jeanmonod R, Miller A, Paladino L, Gaieski D, Yaffee A, et al. The 2019–2020 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic: a joint american college of academic international medicine-world academic council of emergency medicine multidisciplinary covid-19 working group consensus paper. J Glob Infect Dis. 2020;12(2):47. DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_86_20.
40. Tomaskovic A, Weber V, Ochmann D, Neuberger E, Lachtermann E, Brahmer A, et al. Multimodal web-based telerehabilitation for patients with post–covid-19 condition: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025;14:e65044. DOI: 10.2196/65044.
41. Tsagkaris C, Trygonis N, Spyrou V, Koulouris A. Telemedicine in care of sarcoma patients beyond the covid-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities. Cancers. 2023;15(14):3700. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143700.
42. Tukur M, Saad G, Alshagathrh F, Househ M, Agus M. Telehealth interventions during covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review of applications, challenges, privacy and security issues. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023;30(1):e100676. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100676. Wang Z, He K, Sui X, Jiang Y, Yang Z, Wang K, et al. The effect of web-based telerehabilitation programs on children and adolescents with brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e46957. DOI: 10.2196/46957.
43. Xu X, Ho M, Lin C. Telehealth in palliative care during the covid‐19 pandemic: a systematic mixed studies review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023;20(5):476-491. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12637.
44. Youssef Y, Wet D, Back D, Scherer J. Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review. Front Surg. 2024;10. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1325423.
45. Zhang R, Jiang J, Wu W. Scalably nanomanufactured atomically thin materials‐based wearable health sensors. Small Struct. 2021;3(1). DOI: 10.1002/sstr.202100120.
46. Zischke C, Simas V, Hing W, Milne N, Spittle A, Pope R. The utility of physiotherapy assessments delivered by telehealth: a systematic review. J Glob Health. 2021;11. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.04072.