E7 Ülkelerinde Çevreyle İlgili Teknolojik Gelişmeler Çevresel Bozulmayı Etkiler Mi? Driscol-Kraay Yaklaşımı

Öz

E7 ülkelerinde çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması, sadece ekolojik bir zorunluluk değil, aynı zamanda uzun vadeli ve kapsayıcı ekonomik kalkınmanın da anahtarıdır. Hızla büyüyen ekonomilerin geleneksel, fosil yakıta dayalı büyüme politikalarının yol açtığı ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki olumsuz etkiyi hafifletme çabası, kaçınılmaz bir yapısal dönüşüm gerektirmektedir. Bu dönüşüm, özellikle teknolojik ilerleme ve yenilenebilir enerji kullanımının teşvik edilmesi gibi iki temel sütuna dayanmaktadır. Yenilenebilir enerji yatırımları hem enerji bağımlılığını azaltmakta hem de sera gazı emisyonlarını düşürerek iklim değişikliğiyle mücadeleye doğrudan katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada, teknolojik değişmeler, yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyümenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi panel veri analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Analizlerde, 1990–2024 dönemini kapsayan ve E7 ülkelerinin verilerden oluşan panel veri seti kullanılmıştır. Hausman Test sonucunda Sabit Etkiler Modeli’nin geçerli olduğu belirlenmiş, heteroskedastisite ve birimler arası korelasyon sorunlarını gidermek amacıyla Driscoll–Kraay sağlam standart hatalar yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Analizlerden elde edilen bulgulara göre, teknolojik gelişme ve yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi, ekolojik ayak izini azaltıcı yönde etkilerken, ekonomik büyüme çevresel baskıyı artırmaktadır. Bulgular, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmak için büyüme odaklı politikaların “yeşil ekonomi” ilkeleri çerçevesinde yeniden tasarlanması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, yeşil teknolojilere yönelik yatırımların artırılması ve üretim süreçlerinde yenilenebilir enerji kullanımının yaygınlaştırılması, çevresel bozulmanın azaltılmasında ve uzun vadeli ekolojik dengenin sağlanmasında kilit bir rol oynamaktadır. Çalışma genel olarak, ekonomik büyüme ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasında denge kurmanın, teknolojik yenilik ve yenilenebilir enerji dönüşümüne dayalı stratejilerle mümkün olabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekolojik Ayak İzi
• Teknolojik Gelişmeler
• Yenilenebilir Enerji
• Ekonomik Büyüme
• Panel Veri Analizi.

Do Environmental-Related Technological Innovations Affect Environmental Degradation in E7 Countries? The Driscoll–Kraay Approach

Öz

Ensuring environmental sustainability in E7 countries is not merely an ecological imperative, but also the key to achieving long-term and inclusive economic development. The necessity to mitigate the negative impact of conventional, fossil fuel-based growth policies on the ecological footprint of these rapidly expanding economies requires an inevitable structural transformation. This transition is predicated upon two fundamental pillars: particularly technological advancement and the promotion of renewable energy consumption. Renewable energy investments not only reduce energy dependency but also contribute directly to climate change mitigation by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. In this regard, the study examined the impact of technological changes, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on the ecological footprint using the panel data analysis method. The analyses utilized a panel dataset covering the 1990–2024 period, comprising data from the E7 countries. The Hausman Test results determined the Fixed Effects Model to be valid, and the Driscoll–Kraay standard errors method was applied to address the issues of heteroskedasticity and cross-sectional dependence. The findings derived from the analyses indicate that technological development and renewable energy consumption have a mitigating effect on the ecological footprint, while economic growth exacerbates environmental pressure. These results underscore the necessity for growth-oriented policies to be redesigned within the framework of 'green economy' principles to achieve sustainable development goals. Furthermore, increasing investments in green technologies and the widespread adoption of renewable energy in production processes play a pivotal role in reducing environmental degradation and ensuring long-term ecological balance. Overall, the study demonstrates that striking a balance between economic growth and environmental sustainability is attainable through strategies based on technological innovation and the renewable energy transition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecological Footprint
• Technological Developments
• Renewable Energy
• Economic Growth
• Panel Data Analysis.

Kaynakça

1. Adeleye, B.N., Soylu, Ö.B., Ergül, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2025). “Reintroducing Evidence of The Role of Energy Usage Dynamics on Environmental Management In E7 Countries”, Journal of Environmental Management, No:386.
2. Akgün, E. ve Özmerdivanlı, A.. (2024). “Finansal Gelişme, Teknolojik Yenilik ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi Arsındaki İlişki: E7 Ülkeleri Örneği”. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 9(1), 150-165.
3. Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). “Dynamic Impact Of Trade Policy, Economic Growth, Fertility Rate, Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption On Ecological Footprint In Europe”. Science of the Total Environment, 685, 702-709.
4. Asghar, M. M., Arshad, Z., Yousaf, S., e Ali, M. S., & Tariq, M. (2024). “Environmental Degradation in BRI Countries: Navigating the Role of Natural Resources, Green Energy and Green Finance”. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(3), 2705-2716.
5. Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016). “The Dynamic Impact Of Renewable Energy Consumption On CO2 Emissions: A Revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve Approach”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845.
6. Chu, L.K., Doğan, B., Abakah, E.J.A., Ghosh, S.ve Albeni, M. (2023). “Impact Of Economic Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk, And Economic Complexity On Carbon Emissions And Ecological Footprint: An İnvestigation Of The E7 Countries”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30:34406–34427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24682-2
7. Chu, L.K. (2022). “Determinants Of Ecological Footprint in OCED Countries: Do Environmental‑Related Technologies Reduce Environmental Degradation?”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29:23779–23793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17261-4
8. Danish, Wang Z (2019). “Investigation Of The Ecological Footprint’s Driving Factors: What We Learn From The Experience Of Emerging Economies”. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49(March), 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101626

9. Destek MA, Manga M (2021) “Technological İnnovation, Fnancialization, And Ecological Footprint: Evidence From BEM Economies”. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(17):21991–22001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2 Doğan B, Ghosh S, Hoang DP, Chu LK (2022) Are economic complexity and eco-innovation mutually exclusive to control Energy demand and environmental quality in E7 and G7 countries? Technol Soc 68.
10. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of economics and statistics, 80(4), 549-560.
11. Dreher, A. (2006). “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization”. Appl. Econ. 38, 1091–1110.
12. Gökmenoğlu, K.K., Olasehinde-Williams, G.O., Taspinar, N., (2019). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of deforestation. Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization, 61–83.
13. Gyamfi BA, Adedoyin FF, Bein MA, Bekun FV, Agozie DQ (2021) The anthropogenic consequences of energy consumption in E7 economies: juxtaposing roles of renewable, coal, nuclear, oil and gas energy: evidence from panel quantile method. J Clean Prod 295.
14. Hasan, M.,Mahlabin, T., Hossain, A. Kibria, G., Haseeb, M., Hossain, E. (2023). “Towards Green Economy And Sustainable Development İn Bangladesh: Assessing The Role Of Social And Environmental İndicators”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, No: 30, 110324–110339.
15. Hou, H., Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2023). “Green Finance Drives Renewable Energy Development: Empirical Evidence From 53 Countries Worldwide”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(33), 80573-80590.
16. Iram, M., Zameer, S., & Asghar, M. M. (2024). “Financial Development, ICT Use, Renewable Energy Consumption And Foreign Direct Investment Impacts On Environmental Degradation In OIC Countries”. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 1303-1315.
17. Joshi, J. M., Dalei, N. N., & Mehta, P. (2021). Estimation of gross refining margin of Indian petroleum refineries using Driscoll-Kraay standard error estimator. Energy Policy, 150, 112148.
18. Nathaniel, S. P., & Iheonu, C. O. (2019). “Carbon Dioxide Abatement In Africa: The Role Of Renewable And Non-Renewable Energy Consumption”. Science of The Total Environment, 679, 337-345.
19. Naude, W. (2011). “Climate Change and Industrial Policy”. Sustainability, 3, 1003–1021.
20. Özokçu, S. ve Özdemir, O., (2017). “Economic Growth, Energy, And Environmental Kuznets Curve”. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 72, 639–647.
21. Satrovic, E., Khan, I. & Zafar, M.W. (2025). “Unriddling the Environmental Implications of Energy Resources, Globalization, Biocapacity, and Open Trading: Does Human Capital Provoke a Change in Emerging 7”, Environ Model Assess, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-025-10055-9.
22. Sibt-e-Ali, M., Xia, X., Yi, W., & Vasa, L. (2025). “Quantifying The Role Of Digitalization, Financial Technology, Governance And SDG13 In Achieving Environment Conservation In The Perspective Of Emerging Economies”. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-23.
23. Su HN, Moaniba IM (2017) Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 122(May):49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.017
24. Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
25. Wang, B.; Xu, R. (2025). “How Industrial Output, Economic Growth, Environmental Technology, and Globalization Impact Load Capacity Factor in E7 Nations”. Sustainability. 17, 1419. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su17041419.
26. Yuerong, H., Javaid, M. Q., Ali, M. S. E., & Zada, M. (2024). “Revisiting The Nexus Between Digital Trade, Green Technological Innovation, And Environmental Sustainability In BRICS Economies”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(6), 8585-8607.
27. Zeb R, Salar L, Awan U, Zaman K, Shahbaz M (2014). “Causal Links Between Renewable Energy, Environmental Degradation And Economic Growth İn Selected SAARC Countries: Progress Towards Green Economy”. Renew Energy 71:123–132.