-

Öz

Depending on the spatial reflections of different social and political developments, which are defined as transformation dynamics, the concepts of urban planning and urban design differ through the time. After the new developments of the urban transformation, globalization brought forward the concept of Spatial Strategic Planning in order for the cities to take part in the international competitive environment. Urban Projects on the other hand, emerged as fundamental means of this approach by fostering economical growth, conducting the development, creating a new administrative model by republic-private co-operations, establishing social equilibrium and livable environments by mixed usages The aim of this paper is to evaluate the development process of the project base approaches to urban development and concept of urban project and to examine the development process of this new form of intervention for urban space.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban Change, Globalization, Urban Project

Kentsel Proje Kavramı ve Gelişim Süreci

Öz

Değişim dinamikleri olarak tanımlanan farklı ekonomik ve siyasal gelişmelerin, mekansal ölçekte yansıma biçimine bağlı olarak, kent planlama ve tasarım anlayışı dönemsel olarak farklı biçimlerde anlam kazanmıştır. Kentsel değişim sürecinde gelişen yeni yapılanmalar ile birlikte, Küreselleşme,  kentlerin uluslararası düzlemde artan rekabet ortamında yer alabilmesi için Mekansal Stratejik Planlama yaklaşımını gündeme getirmiştir. Kentsel projeler ise ekonomik güç kazanma, gelişmeyi yönlendirme, kamu-özel işbirlikleri ile yeni bir yönetim modeli oluşturma, karma kullanımlar ile  sosyal dengeyi kurma ve yaşanabilir çevreler yaratma  hedefi ile  bu yaklaşımın en temel eylem alanları olarak yapılanmaya başlamıştır.

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kentsel gelişmede proje temelli yaklaşımları, kentsel proje kavramını ele almak kentsel mekana yönelik bu yeni müdahale biçiminin  gelişim sürecini irdelemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Kentsel değişim, Küreselleşme, Kentsel Proje

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kentsel değişim, Küreselleşme, Kentsel Proje

Kaynakça

1. Albrechts, L., (2006), Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects, European Planning Studies, 14/10, 1487-1500.
2. Altshuler, Alan A. and David E. Luberoff (2004) €œMega-Projects: The Changing Asia, Urban Studies,37 (12), syf. 315-335.
3. Bianchini, F. & Parkinson, M. (Eds) (1993) Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
4. Newman P. and A. Thornley, 1995, Euralille: €˜boosterism' at the centre of Europe, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, nr. 3: 237-246.
5. Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore (2010a), €˜After neoliberalization?', Globalizations, 7: 3, pp. 327€“345.
6. Brenner, N., Peck, J. & Theodore, N. (2010b) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways, Global Networks 9, in press.
7. Castells, M. and Borja, J., 1997. Local and Global Management of Cities in the Information Age, London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.
8. Cameron J., Odendaal N. and Todes A., (2004). Integrated Area Development Projects:Working Towards Innovation And Sustainability, Urban Forum, 15/4, sayfa

9. Çubuk, M., (1993) Kentsel Gelişmenin Yönlenmesinde Kentsel Tasarım Ve Yeni Denge
10. Araçları: Büyük Kentsel Projeler, 4. Kentsel Tasarım Ve Uygulamalar Sempozyumu, 26-27 Mayıs,1993
11. Douglass, M. (1999) Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Politics of Urban
12. Public Investment€ (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
13. Emrealp, S., (1993). Belediyelere Proje Yönetimi, Yerel Yönetimin Geliştirilmesi Programı El Kitapları Dizisi 3, İstanbul
14. Erden Erbey, D., (2004). Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileşmede Dönüşüm Projeleri €“ Eyüp Rehabilitasyon Projeleri, Planlama Dergisi, Sayı,4
15. Gospodini, A., (2002) European Cities İn Competition And The New €˜Uses' Of urban Design, Journal Of Urban Design, 7/1, 59€“73.
16. Gospodini, A., (2005) Landscape Transformations İn The Postmodern İnner City: Clustering Flourishing Economic Activities And €˜Glocalising' Morphologies, Sustainable Development and Planning II,, 2, sayfa
17. M. Hajer and A. Reijndrop. (2001) In Search of New Public Domain. NAI Publishers, Rotterdam, 2003
18. Harvey, D. (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford, Blackwell, Türkçe Çevirisi: Postmodernliğin Durumu, 1997, Metis Yayınları, çev: S. Savran.
19. Sorkin M. (1992) Variations On a Theme Park: the New American City and the End of Public Space, New York; Hill and Wong.
20. Healey, P., (2003). Creatıvıty and urban governance, ECPR Workshop 21,Assessing Emergent Forms of Governance: European Public Policies Beyond the €˜Institutional Void', Edinburgh, March 2003, pp. 87-102.
21. Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S. and Madani-Pour, A. (1995), (eds), Managing Cities: the New Urban Context, Wiley: London.
22. Zukin, Sharon, (1991) Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press,
23. Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A. and Needham, B., (1999) European Developments in Strategic Spatial Planning, European Planning Studies, 7/3, 339-355.
24. Konuk, G., (2007) €œPlanlamada Değişim ve Yeni Arayışlar€ İstanbul Buluşmaları
25. Sempozyumu, €œİstanbul'da Büyük Projeler€8€“9 Ekim 2007
26. Legeby,A.,(2010),Urban Segregatıon And Urban Form From residential Segregation
27. to segregation in public space, Licentiate Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Architecture and the Built Environment School of Architecture, Stockholm, Sweden
28. Loftman, P. and Nevin, B., (1995). Prestige Projects and Urban Regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: a review of benefits and limitations, Planning Practice and Research, 10/3-4, 299-315.
29. Majoor, S., (2006). Conditions for multiple land use in large-scale urban projects, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21, 15-32.
30. Majoor, S., (2007) Amsterdam Zuidas: The Dream Of €˜New Urbanity'€, İn: W.G.M. Framing Strategic Urban Projects Eds. Salet And E. Gualini, Routledge, London, Pp. 53-83.
31. Majoor, S., (2009) The Disconnected Innovation of New Urbanity in Zuidas Amsterdam, Ørestad Copenhagen and Forum Barcelona, European Planning Studies, 17/9, 1379-1402
32. Monclus, F., J., (2003), The Barcelona Model: An Original Formula? From Reconstruction to Strategic Urban Projects, 1979-2004, Planning Perspectives, 18, 399-421.
33. Moulaert (F.), Rodrıguez (A.), Swyngedouw (E.), (2003) €œThe Globalized City; Economic
34. Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities€, New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Graham, S. and Marvin, S., (2001) €˜Urban Futures? Integrating Telecommunications into
36. Urban Planning'. Madanipor, A., Hull, A. and Healey, P., eds. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate
37. Moulaert F., and Nussbaumer J.,(2005), Defining the Social Economy and its
38. Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection, Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2071€“2088, October 2005
39. Newman, P. and Thornley, A., (2002) Urban Planning in Euope, Routledge.
40. Özaydın, G., (2006) Role Of Urban Projects As A Tool In Urban Integratıon and Dısıntegratıon, 42nd ISOCARP Congress 2006
41. Özsavaşçı, A., (2005), €œII No'lu Park, Habitat Vadisi, Kongre vadisi€¦Kentsel Değişim ve Dönüşüm Sürecinde Taksim-Maçka Yeşil Alanı€, mimar.ist, Sayı: 16, s. 16-23.
42. Savitch, H. V., Kantor, P., (2004), Cities in the International Marketplace : The political
43. economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
44. Swygenedouw,E.,Moulert, F. and Rodriguez, A.,(2002) Neoliberal Urbanization İn Europe
45. Large Scale Urban Developmen Projects And New Urban Policy, Black Well Publising, Oxford, USA
46. Tavsanoglu, S. & Healey, P. (1992) Editorial, in: P. Healey et al. (Eds) Rebuilding the City: property-led urban regeneration, pp. 117±124 (London, E. & F. N. Spon).