Bilişsel Budun Dil Bilimi Üzerine Bir Sözlükçe Denemesi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 24 - 34, 03.10.2018

Şahru Pilten Ufuk

Öz

           Bilişsel budun dil bilimi XX. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren gelişen disiplinler arası bir bilim dalıdır. Dünyada giderek önem kazanan bir alan olmasına karşın Türk literatüründe bilişsel budun dil bilimi üzerine yapılmış çalışmalar yok denecek kadar azdır. Bu çalışmayla, bilişsel budun dil bilimine ait temel kavramlarının tanıtılması ve bu terimler için tarafımızdan kullanılan Türkçe karşılıkların bilim âlemine sunulması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda bilişsel budun dil biliminin temel kavramlarını içeren 86 terimlik alfabetik bir sözlükçe hazırlanmıştır.

An Essay on Glossary of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics

Öz

            Cognitive ethnolinguistics is an interdisciplinary field that has developed since the second half of the twentieth century. Although it is a research field that gains importance in the international scientific scene, there are almost no studies on cognitive ethnolinguistics in the Turkish literature. With this study, it is aimed to introduce the basic concepts of cognitive ethnolinguistics and present the Turkish equivalents for these terms to the scientific world in a compact way. In this direction, an alphabetical glossary containing 86 terms of the basic concepts of cognitive ethnolinguistics has been prepared.

Kaynakça

• Aitchison, J., 1987. Words in the Mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
• Atran, S., 1998. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav Brain Sci., 21, 547–569.
• Atran, S., 1999. Folkbiology. In: Wilson, R. ve Keil, F., (Ed.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Londra, England, 316-317.
• Barsalou, L. W., 1985. Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
• Berlin, B., 1992. Ethnobiological classification. Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. ve Raven, P. H., 1973. General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. Amer. Anthro. 75: 214-42.
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. ve Raven, P. H., 1968. Covert Categories and Folk Taxonomies. Amer. Anthro. 70: 290-99.
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. ve Raven, P. H., 1974. Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification: An Introduction to the Botanical Ethnography of a Mayan Speaking Community in Highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.
• Berlin, B. ve Kay, P., 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Brown, C. H., 1984. Language and Living Things: Uniformities in Folk Classification and Naming. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.
• Brown, C. H., 2000. Folk Classification: An Introduction. Minnis, P.E., (Ed.), Ethnobotany: A reader. University of Oklahoma Press, 65-70.
• Conklin, H. C., 1962. Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. International Journal of American Linguistics 28: 119-141.
• Ellen, F. R., 1993. The cultural relations of classification: an analysis of Nuaulu animal categories from central Seram. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Fillmore, C. J., 1982. Frame semantics. The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Hanshin, Seoul, 111-37.
• Forth, G., 1995. Ethnozoological Classification and Classificatory Language among the Nage of Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Ethnobiology 15:45–69.
• Frake, C. O., 1961. The diagnosis of disease among the Subanum of Mindanao. American Anthropologist 63:113-32.
• Frake, C. O., 1962. Cultural ecology and ethnography. American Anthropologist, 64: 53-59.
• Güncel Türkçe Sözlük.
• http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&view=gts, 07.07.2018, =GTS
• Hunn, E., 1976. Toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification. American Ethnologist 3/3: 508-524.
• Hunn, E., 1977. Tzeltal folk zoology: the classification of discontinuities in nature. Academic Press, New York.
• Katamba, F., 2005. English words. 2. Baskı. Routledge, Londra ve New York.
• Kess, J. F., 1992. Psycholinguistics: Psychology, Linguistics, and The Study of Natural Language. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
• Labov, W., 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. Bailey, J. N. ve Shuy, R. W., (Ed.), New Ways of Analysing Variation in English. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, 340-373.
• Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Langacker, R. W., 1986. An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1-40.
• Langacker, R. W., 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York.
• Leyew, Z., 2011. Wild Plant Nomenclature and Traditional Botanical Knowledge Among Three Ethnolinguistic Groups in Northwestern Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Organisation for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa.
• Medin, D.L. ve Atran, S., 2004. The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychol Rev 111: 960–983.
• Medin, D. L., ve Schaffer, M. M., 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
• Medin, D. L. ve Schwanenflugel, P. J., 1981. Linear separability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355–368.
• Pilten Ufuk, Ş., 2017. Türk Bilişsel Budun Dil Bilimine Giriş Halk Sınıflandırmaları -Temel Aşamalar-. Grafiker Yayınları, Ankara.
• Romano, P.R.C., 2011. A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 2, No. 1: 241–277.
• Rosch, E., 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Moore, T.E., (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Academic Press, NewYork, 111-44.
• Rosch, E., 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192-233.
• Rosch, E., 1978. Principles of categorization. Rosch, E. ve Lloyd, B., (Ed.), Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 27-48.
• Rosch, E. ve Mervis, C. B., 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573-605.
• Schank, R. C ve Abelson, R. P., 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
• Smith, E.E ve Medin D.L., 2002. The Exemplar View. Levitin, D. (Ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Psychology: Core Readings. MIT Press, 277-292.
• Sokal, R., 1995. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Society by Brent Berlin. Language, Vol. 71, No. 1 (Mar.), Linguistic Society of America: 160-163.
• Wallace, H., 2006. Classification, Life Processes. Heinemann-Raintree.
• Waxman, S. R., 1999. The dubbing ceremony revisited: Object naming and categorization in infancy and early childhood. Medin, D. L. ve Atran, S., (Ed.), Folkbiology. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA, 233-284.
• Wittgenstein, L., 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
• Yule, G., 2006. The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.