ANALYSIS OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE PLATES USING ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHOD

Abstract

The desire to use materials with high strength/weight or stiffness/weight ratio is increased the importance of composite materials nowadays. Due to this, much attention has been devoted to the numerical analysis of composite plates. The performance of well-known numerical methods, Finite Element Method (FEM) and Boundary Element Method (BEM), are based on the quality mesh structures. Meshfree methods are free from the meshes and the drawbacks of mesh-based interpolation techniques. Because of its high convergence rate, Element-Free Galerkin Method (EFGM) is one of the most widely used meshfree method in solid body mechanics and it is a promising candidate for the analysis of composite materials. In this study; deflection analysis of laminated composite plates are studied using EFGM. Several laminated composite plate problems are solved using EFGM and the displacement results of EFGM solutions are compared with the results of exact and FEM solutions at the critical points.

Kaynakça

1. . J. N. Reddy, A. A. Khdeir, “Buckling of vibration of laminated composite plates using various plate theories,” AIAA Journal, 27(12), 1808-1817, 1989.
2. . A. H. Sheikh, S. Haldar, D. Sengupta, “A high precision shear deformable element for the analysis of laminated composite plates of different shapes,” Composite Structures, 55(3), 329-336, 2002.
3. . A. Reis, E. L. Albuquerque, F. L. Torsani, L. P. Junior, P. Sollero, “Computation of moments and stresses in laminated composite plates by the boundary element method,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 35, 105-113, 2010.
4. . S. K. Numayr, R. H. Haddad, M. A. Haddad, “Free vibration of composite plates using the finite difference method,” Thin-Walled Structures, 42, 399-414, 2004.
5. . T. Belytschko, “Meshless methods an overview and recent developments,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 38, 1655-1679, 1996.
6. . G.R. Liu, Mesh Free Methods Moving Beyond The Finite Element Method, Taylor and Francis Group, (2003).
7. . J. Belinha, L. M. J. S. Dinis, “Analysis of plates and laminates using the element-free Galerkin method,”
8. Computers and Structures, 84, 1547-1559, 2006.

9. . A. G. Arani, Sh. Maghamikia, M. Mohammadimehr, A. Arefmanesh, “Buckling analysis of laminated
10. composite rectangular plates reinforced by SWCNTs using analytical and finite element methods,” Journal
11. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25(3), 809-820, 2011.
12. . M. R. Aagaah, M. Mahinfalah, G. N. Jazar, “Natural frequencies of laminated composite plates using third
13. order shear deformation theory,” Composite Structures, 72, 273-279, 2006.
14. . S. S. Ghorashi, S. R. Sabbagh-Yazdi, S. Mohammadi, “Element free Galerkin method for crack analysis of
15. orthotropic plates,” Computational Methods in Civil Engineering, 1, 1-13, 2010.
16. . S. S. Ghorashi, S. Mohammadi, S. R. Sabbagh-Yazdi, “Orthotropic enriched element free Galerkin method
17. for fracture analysis of composites,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 78, 1906-1927, 2011.
18. . J. N. Reddy, Mechanics of laminated composite plates, CRC Press, 1996.
19. . P. Umasree, K. Bhaskar, “Accurate flexural analysis of clamped moderately thick cross-ply rectangular
20. plates by superposition of exact untruncated infinite series solutions,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics
21. Composite, 24(16), 1723-1736, 2002.