Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy in Turkey: Public Perception

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 11, 01.08.2017

Emrah Akyüz

Öz

Turkey intends to
build three nuclear power stations in the Akkuyu, Sinop
and Igneada regions to meet its increasing energy demands. This policy,
however, is still a highly controversial topic in Turkey as nuclear energy has
both advantages and disadvantages. The related literature on this topic is
divided into two groups; supporters claim that nuclear energy may decrease
Turkey's energy dependency on other countries, as it already imports
approximately 70% of its total energy demand. In contrast, opponents argue that
nuclear energy poses serious risks to the environment, which in turn can affect
human health and lives. This discussion is, however, held mainly by decision
makers, NGOs, the media and scholars. The related literature shows that we know
little about how the civil populace perceive the pros and cons of NPPs. In
order to fill in this gap, this research aims to explore citizens’ perceptions
of the advantages and disadvantages of NPPs through semi-structured interviews
with people local to the Akkuyu, Sinop and Igneada
regions. It concludes that people are well informed about pros and cons of
NPPs. They raise three main advantages including cheap electricity, low carbon
dioxide and reliability, and two disadvantages, including issues of nuclear
waste and the risk of accident.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Energy Policy, Nuclear Energy, the Environment, renewable energy

Kaynakça

• Aghayev, E., & Aktaş, H. (2017). Prospects of Cooperation between Russia and Turkey. Evropejskij Issledovatelʹ, 2(8), 98-103. Akcay, B. (2009). The case of nuclear energy in Turkey: from Chernobyl to Akkuyu nuclear power plant. Energy Sources, Part B, 4(4), 347-355. Akyuz, E. (2015). Turkey's energy profile and the importance of renewable energy sources. Academic Sight, 49, 494-504. Akyuz, E. (2015). Turkey's Nuclear Energy Policy and the Terrorist Threat. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, (40), 523-536. Aras, E. (2013). The necessity of nuclear energy in Turkey: a comparison with hydropower energy. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 8(2), 107-114. Coskun, M. B., & Tanriover, B. (2016). An investigation on nuclear energy policy in Turkey and public perception. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 128, p. 05001). EDP Sciences. Eckstein, H. (2000). Case study and theory in political science. Case study method, 119-164. Elliott, D. (Ed.). (2016). Nuclear or not?: does nuclear power have a place in a sustainable energy future?. Springer. Erdogdu, E. (2007). Nuclear power in open energy markets: A case study of Turkey. Energy Policy, 35(5), 3061-3073. Ertör-Akyazı, P., Adaman, F., Özkaynak, B., & Zenginobuz, Ü. (2012). Citizens’ preferences on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Policy, 47, 309-320. Gomm, R. (2009). Key concepts in social research methods. Palgrave Macmillan. Gunay, D., & Iseri, E. (2017). Unexpected Persistence Amidst Enlargement Stasis: Usages of Europe in Turkey’s Nuclear Energy Debate. South European Society and Politics, 22(1), 101-119. Heffron, R. J., & Hatinoǧlu, B. (2014). Choice of nuclear technology and legislative certainty for nuclear safety and liability in Turkey. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 7(3), 274-281. Jewell, J., & Ates, S. A. (2015). Introducing nuclear power in Turkey: A historic state strategy and future prospects. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 273-282. Kaplan, Y. A., Karagöz, M., & Sayılmaz, S. (2017). The overview of nuclear energy situation in the World and Turkey. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 154, p. 01017). EDP Sciences. Kok, B., & Benli, H. (2017). Energy diversity and nuclear energy for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 111, 870-877. Kurt, Ü. (2014). The fuzzy TOPSIS and generalized Choquet fuzzy integral algorithm for nuclear power plant site selection–a case study from Turkey. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 51(10), 1241-1255. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-526. Melikoglu, M. (2016). The role of renewables and nuclear energy in Turkey׳ s Vision 2023 energy targets: Economic and technical scrutiny. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1-12. Oner, F. (2011). Energy Status and Peaceful Usage of Nuclear Energy in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(3), 314-319. Ozcan, M., Yildirim, M., & Ozturk, S. (2016). Generation expansion planning scenarios to reduce natural gas dependency of Turkey. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 34(2), 244-261. Pfefferbaum, B., Weems, C. F., Scott, B. G., Nitiéma, P., Noffsinger, M. A., Pfefferbaum, R. L., ... & Chakraburtty, A. (2013, August). Research methods in child disaster studies: A review of studies generated by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks; the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; and Hurricane Katrina. In Child & youth care forum (Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 285-337). Springer US. Sirin, S. M. (2010). An assessment of Turkey’s nuclear energy policy in light of South Korea’s nuclear experience. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6145-6152. Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K., Poumadere, M., & Mays, C. (2000). Nuclear power and the public. In Cross-cultural risk perception (pp. 55-102). Springer US. Talinli, I., Topuz, E., & Akbay, M. U. (2010). Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): Sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4479-4488. World Nuclear Association, Nuclear Power in Turkey. Accessed online: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/turkey.aspx Accessed date: 30.09.2017.