Insights on motor-manual tree felling in Germany, recent developments to ensure efficient operations in singletree selection harvest
Abstract
Despite an intensive mechanization trend in German forest operations since the early 1990s, many sites restrict the efficient implementation of fully mechanized harvesting systems. Trafficability and singletree selection harvest-based silviculture, focusing on high stem volume broadleaves, such as European beech, are the main limitations. Thus, motor-manual operations are still prevalent but need to be adapted to stay efficient and improve safety in a changing work environment. Recent developments of new felling techniques and aiding tools and advances in training and work organization improved occupational health and safety. Also, these achievements help to avoid log devaluation due to felling damages. The general digitalization trend did not ignore motor-manual operations either. Smartphone applications can already contribute to more efficient bucking, operation planning and fleet management. Yet, motor-manual operations will remain cost-intensive, and expose worker directly to occupational hazards. Therefore, operations should take as much advantage of mechanized systems as possible for feasible and applicable silvicultural objectives.
Keywords
Occupational health and safety , forest worker , felling equipment , digitalization
References
- Axelsson, S.-Å., 1998. The Mechanization of Logging Operations in Sweden and its Effect on Occupational Safety and Health. International Journal of Forest Engineering 9(2):25–31. DOI: 10.1080/08435243.1998.10702715
- Berendt, F., Fortin, M., Jaeger, D., Schweier, J., 2017. How Climate Change Will Affect Forest Composition and Forest Operations in Baden-Württemberg—A GIS-Based Case Study Approach. Forests 8(8):298. DOI: 10.3390/f8080298
- BMBF (Ed.), 2005. Berufsbildungsgesetz. BBiG, revised 7/17/2017. Edited by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbig_2005/BBiG.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2019)
- BMEL (Ed.), 2017. Waldbericht der Bundesregierung 2017. Edited by Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. Bonn.
- BMEL (Ed.), 2019. Forstwirtschaft in Deutschland. Edited by Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. https://www.forstwirtschaft-in-deutschland.de/forstwirtschaft/forstwirtschaft-in-deutschland/ (Accessed: 16 November 2019).
- DGUV (Ed.), 2014. Sichere Waldarbeiten. Edited by Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfall Versicherung (DGUV Informationen, 214-046). Berlin
- Eber, J., 2019. Motorsäge und App. Forst und Technik (7):20–23.
- EFESC (Ed.), 2017. EFESC Handbook. Edited by European Forestry and Environmental Skills Council, KWF Groß-Umstadt/Germany. https://efesc.org/wp-content/uploads/12_EFESC_Handbook_Nov_2017-1.pdf (Accessed: 19 November 2019).
- Erber, G., Stelzer, S., Stampfer, K., 2021. Evaluation of a novel mobile device app for value-maximized bucking by chainsaw. International Journal of Forest Engineering (online first). DOI:10.1080/14942119.2021.1927362
- European Parliament and Council, 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/425 of the European Parliament and of the Council on personal protective equipment. EU/2016/425. Official Journal of the European Union (L81/51). FAO (Ed.), 1980. Chainsaws in Tropical Forests. Edited by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 96 p.
