Evaluation of atherosclerotic polaque, coronary stent and coronary by-pass grafts with 128-slice CT and technical optimization: our single center experiences

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 14 - 21, 01.03.2012

Mustafa Kayan Meltem Çetin Yasin Türker Ömer Yılmaz Mehmet Munduz Selçuk Yaşar Mahmut Duymuş

https://izlik.org/JA35CX82GZ

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Evaluation of atherosclerotic polaque, coronary stent and coronary by-pass grafts with 128-slice CT and technical optimization: our single center experiences

https://izlik.org/JA35CX82GZ

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(5):1478-92.
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary ar- tery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15(4):827-32.
• Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froehlich J, et al. Coronary artery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology 1994;192(3):619-23.
• Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5-40.
• Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal reso- lution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(1):123-7.
• Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, et al. Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary stenosis with mul- tislice computed tomography angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(10):1225-7.
• Leiner T, Gerretsen S, Botnar R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur Radiol 2005;15(6):1087-99.
• Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Working Group Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1999;20(7):484-95.
• Papaconstantinou HD, Marshall AJ, Burrell CJ. Diagnostic cardiac catheterisation in a hospital without on-site car- diac surgery. Heart 1999;81(5):465-9.
• Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000;215(1):55-62.
• Mahesh M, Cody DD. Physics of cardiac imaging with multi- ple-row detector CT. Radiographics 2007;27(5):1495-509.
• Pannu HK, Jacobs JE, Lai S, Fishman EK. Coronary CT an- giography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):119-26.
• Takeyama N, Ohgiya Y, Itokawa H, et al. Comparison of 40 and 60 milliliters of contrast in assessment of the carotid artery by computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiol 2008;49(9):1068-78.
• Sangiorgi G, Rumberger JA, Severson A, et al. Arterial cal- cification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalci- fying methodology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(1):126-33.
• Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guide- lines for exercise testing: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). Circulation 1997;96(1):345-54.
• Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Karstaedt N, et al. Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77(1):55-71.
• Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2001;104(3):365-72.
• Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 1993;362(6423):801-9.
• Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(5):842-7.
• Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multide- tector spiral computed tomography in identifying and dif- ferentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultra- sound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(7):1241-7.
• Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ, et al. ACCF/AHA clini- cal competence statement on cardiac imaging with com- puted tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(2):383-402.
• Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by 0.5-mm-slice multislice com- puted tomographic imaging. Circ J 2007;71(3):363-6.
• Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice com- puted tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using in- travascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(3):672-7.
• Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A. Impact of calcification on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice spiral computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease: a single center experience. Arch Iran Med 2010;13(5):373-83.
• Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110(20):3234-8.
• Uva MS, Matias F, Mesquita A, et al. Sixteen-slice multi- detector computed tomography for graft patency evalu- ation after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 2008;23(1):17-22.
• Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetec- tor computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and car- diovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008;118(5):586-606.
• Mannacio VA, Imbriaco M, Iesu S, Giordano AL, Di Tommaso L, Vosa C. 64-slice multidetector computed to- mographic evaluation of arterial conduit patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J 2009;36(5):409-15.
• Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330- ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006;114(22):2334-41; quiz
• Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Noninvasive visualization of coronary ar- tery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed to- mography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(6):1224-9.
• Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41(1):22-7.
• Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL, et al. High diagnos- tic accuracy of prospective ECG-gating 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in- stent restenosis: in-stent restenosis assessment by low- dose MDCT. Eur Radiol 2011;21(7):1430-8.
• Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coro- nary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27(21):2567-72.