BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 31 - 35, 01.03.2011

Mustafa Koplay Elif Aksakalli Serdar Toker Seda Ozbek Ali Sami Kivrak

https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
  • Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
  • Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
  • Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
  • Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
  • Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
  • Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
  • Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
  • Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
  • Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
  • Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
  • Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chon- dral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.

Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 31 - 35, 01.03.2011

Mustafa Koplay Elif Aksakalli Serdar Toker Seda Ozbek Ali Sami Kivrak

https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
  • Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
  • Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
  • Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
  • Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
  • Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
  • Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
  • Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
  • Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
  • Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
  • Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
  • Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chon- dral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Yazarlar

Mustafa Koplay Bu kişi benim

Elif Aksakalli Bu kişi benim

Serdar Toker Bu kişi benim

Seda Ozbek Bu kişi benim

Ali Sami Kivrak Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2011
IZ https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Koplay, M., Aksakalli, E., Toker, S., Ozbek, S., & Kivrak, A. S. (2011). Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(1), 31-35. https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH
AMA 1.Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8(1):31-35. https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH
Chicago Koplay, Mustafa, Elif Aksakalli, Serdar Toker, Seda Ozbek, ve Ali Sami Kivrak. 2011. “Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine 8 (1): 31-35. https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH.
EndNote Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS (01 Mart 2011) Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine 8 1 31–35.
IEEE [1]M. Koplay, E. Aksakalli, S. Toker, S. Ozbek, ve A. S. Kivrak, “Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy”, European Journal of General Medicine, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 31–35, Mar. 2011, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH
ISNAD Koplay, Mustafa - Aksakalli, Elif - Toker, Serdar - Ozbek, Seda - Kivrak, Ali Sami. “Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine 8/1 (01 Mart 2011): 31-35. https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH.
JAMA 1.Koplay M, Aksakalli E, Toker S, Ozbek S, Kivrak AS. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine. 2011;8:31–35.
MLA Koplay, Mustafa, vd. “Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy”. European Journal of General Medicine, c. 8, sy 1, Mart 2011, ss. 31-35, https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH.
Vancouver 1.Mustafa Koplay, Elif Aksakalli, Serdar Toker, Seda Ozbek, Ali Sami Kivrak. Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine [Internet]. 01 Mart 2011;8(1):31-5. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA82NH27AH