Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy
Abstract
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
- Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
- Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
- Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
- Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
- Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
- Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
- Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Mustafa Koplay
Bu kişi benim
Elif Aksakalli
Bu kişi benim
Serdar Toker
Bu kişi benim
Seda Ozbek
Bu kişi benim
Ali Sami Kivrak
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Mart 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi
27 Nisan 2015
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2011 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1