The Effect of Employee Empowerment on Entrepreneurship in Education Management: Mediation Role of Organizational Culture

Öz

In this study, the relationship between the empowerment activities applied to employees in education, and entrepreneurship and the mediation role of organizational culture in this relationship are examined. In line with this, the research is a descriptive study in the relational screening model. For this purpose, entrepreneurship and organizational culture are discussed in four dimensions, and employee empowerment in five dimensions. The study was conducted by using a Likert-type questionnaire for 222 educators in 22 schools (192 teachers, 22 principals and 8 assistant principals) in Gaziantep. Employee empowerment, entrepreneurship and organizational culture scales were used to gather data. The correlation and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data. As a result of the research, a relationship between the dimensions was found to be significant and positive in the correlation analysis which was conducted to determine the relationship between the sub-dimensions of the scales of employee empowerment, entrepreneurship and organizational culture. According to the results in regression analysis; it was determined that organizational culture level is the sub-predictor in the prediction of entrepreneurship of employee empowerment in education employees, solutions were presented on the subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Employee empowerment,entrepreneurship,organizational culture,mediation

Kaynakça

1. Akcakaya, M. (2010). Orgutlerde uygulanan personel guclendirme yontemleri: Turk kamu yonetiminde personel guclendirme. Karadeniz Arastirmalari, 25, 145-174.
2. Akgemci, T., & Cavus, M.F. (2008). Isletmelerde personel guclendirmenin orgutsel yaraticilik ve yenilikcilige etkisi: Imalat sanayiinde bir arastirma. Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 20, 230-244.
3. Akin, M. (2010). Personeli guclendirme algilamasi, orgut iklimi algilamasi ve yaratici kisilik ozelliklerinin orgut duzeyinde yaratici ciktilar uzerindeki dogrudan ve dolayli etkileri. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 29, 211-238.
4. Altuntas, G., & Donmez D. (2010). Girisimcilik yonelimi ve orgutsel performans iliskisi: Canakkale bolgesinde faaliyet gosteren otel isletmelerinde bir arastirma. Istanbul Universitesi Isletme Fakultesi Dergisi, 39(1), 50-74.
5. Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R.D. (2003). Clarifying the entrepreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7-24.
6. Baird, I.S., & Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 10, 230-243.
7. Bakan, I. (2004). Cagdas yonetim yaklasimlari (Ilkeler, kavramlar ve yaklasimlar). Istanbul: Beta Basim Yayim Dagitim.
8. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

9. Bolat, T. Bolat, O.I., Seymen, O.A. (2009). Guclendirici lider davranislari ve orgutsel vatandaslik davranisi arasindaki iliskinin sosyal mubadele kuramindan hareketle incelenmesi, Balikesir Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 12(21), 215-239.
10. Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 31-39.
11. Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E.K., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S. ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. (4. Baski) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R.E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
13. Caliskan, A. Akkoc, I., & Turunc, O. (2011). Orgutsel performansin artirilmasinda motivasyonel davranislarin rolu: Yenilikcilik ve girisimciligin aracilik rolu. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 16, 363-401.
14. Cavus, M.F. (2008). Personel guclendirme: Imalat sanayii isletmelerinde bir arastirma. Journal of Yasar University, 3(10), 1287-1300.
15. Erdem, R. (2007). Orgut kulturu tipleri ile orgutsel baglilik arasindaki iliski: Elazig il merkezindeki hastaneler uzerinde bir calisma. Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi. I.B.B.F. Dergisi, 2(2), 63-79.
16. Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P., & Barron, K.E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
17. Genc, N. (2004). Yonetim ve organizasyon: Cagdas sistemler ve yaklasimlar. Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.
18. Hisrich, D.R., & Peters P.M. (1998). Entrepreneurship. New York: McGraw-Hill Publication.
19. Honold, L. (1997). A review of the literature on employee empowerment. Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4), 202-212.
20. Ira, N., & Aksu, A. (2009). Orgutsel kultur (Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Ornegi). Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Buca Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 25(126), 43-62.
21. Jeffrey, Hornsby S., & Kuratko D.F., Shaker Z. (2002). A. middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneur ship: Assessing a Measurement Scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 253-273.
22. Karahan, A. (2006). Calisanlarin orgut kulturunu algilamalarina yonelik ampirik bir calisma, Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 20, 458-478.
23. Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel arastirma yontemi. 8. Basim, Ankara: Nobel.
24. Knight, G.A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 213-225.
25. Koklu, N., Buyukozturk, S., & Cokluk, O. (2007). Sosyal bilimler icin istatistik (Ikinci baski). Ankara: Pegem Yayinlari.
26. Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
27. Martins, E.C. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
28. Naktiyok, A., & Kok, S.B. (2006). Cevresel faktorlerin ic girisimcilik uzerine etkileri. Afyon Kocatepe Universitesi I.I.B.F Dergisi, 8(2), 77-96.
29. Onay, M., & Cavusoglu S. (2010). Isletmelerde girisimcilik ozelligini etkileyen faktorler: Ic girisimcilik. Yonetim ve ekonomi. Celal Bayar Universitesi I.I.B.F., 17(1), 48-67.
30. Ocal, H., & Agca V. (2010). Teknolojik degisimlerin hizina bagli olarak farklilasan endustri yapilarinin orgut kulturu ve isletme performansi uzerine etkileri. Ege Akademik Bakis, 10(1), 157-182.
31. Ogut, A., Aygen, S., & Demirsel, M.T. (2007). Personel guclendirme inovasyonu hizlandirir mi? Antalya ili bes yildizli konaklama isletmelerine yonelik gorgul bir arastirma. Selcuk Üniversitesi Karaman I.I.B.F. Dergisi, Mayıs, 163-172.
32. Shakil, A.F, Faizi, W.U.N., Ahmed, S.M. & Jabeen, F. (2015). A critical study of the subject of education at graduate level in karachi. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 81-89. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.4.2.81.
33. Wasti, A., & Fis, A.M. (2009). Orgut kulturu ve girisimcilik yonelimi iliskisi. ODTU Gelisme Dergisi, 35(129), 127-164.
34. Yeniceri, O. (2001). Orgut ve yonetici gelistirmede yeni yaklasimlar. Standard Ekonomi ve Teknik Dergisi, 476, Ankara, 62-72.
35. Yuksel, O., & Erkutlu, H (2003). Personeli guclendirme-empowerment. G.U., I.I.B.F. Dergisi, 5(1), 131-142.
36. Zahra, S.A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneur ship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-28.