How Do Swimming Students' Anthropometric Characteristics Affect Short-Course Swimming Performance

Abstract

It has been found that anthropometric swimming performance factors may be related to and affect swimming performance. In light of this, the study's objective was to examine the association between certain motoric and anthropometric traits and 25-meter freestyle swimming performance results. A total of 16 male swimming students from Yozgat Bozok University's Faculty of Sport Sciences (age: 21.75±1.23 years; weight: 78.29±13.04 kg; height: 177±5.44 cm; body fat percentage: 17±7.5 %) took part in the study as volunteers. Height, body mass, skinfold thickness, circumference measurements (biceps in flexion, calf), diameter measurements (humerus epicondyle, femur epicondyle), static flexibility measurements (shoulder flexion, trunk-neck extension, ankle extension), and strength measurements (leg strength, back strength) were carried out to assess the anthropometric measurements of swimming students. In a semi-Olympic swimming pool, short-course freestyle scores of swimming students were recorded. The data appeared to have a normal distribution after the skewness and kurtosis tests, so the Pearson Correlation test was used to look at the correlation between 25-meter freestyle swimming levels and other characteristics. It was discovered that there was no statistically significant correlation between static flexibility and strength tests and 25-meter freestyle swimming performance results, but there was a negative and statistically significant correlation between swimming performance results of swimming students and mesomorph variables (r=-0.529, p=0.035). It is believed that identifying swimmers' somatotype structures may be crucial for talent selection and serve as an indicator of swimming ability.

Keywords

• Swimming
• Somatotype
• Strength
• Flexibility
• Swimming Degree

Kaynakça

1. Aslan, C. S., Büyükdere, C., Köklü, Y., Özkan, A., & Özdemir, F. N. Ş. (2011). Elit altı sporcularda vücut kompozisyonu, anaerobik performans ve sırt kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8, 1612-1628.
2. Barbosa, T. M., Costa, M., Marinho, D. A., Coelho, J., Moreira, M., & Silva, A. J. (2010). Modeling the links between young swimmers’ performance: energetic and biomechanic profiles. Pediatric Exercise Science, 22(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.22.3.379
3. Barbosa, T. M., Morouço, P. G. F., Jesus, S., Feitosa, W. G., Costa, M. J., Marinho, D. A., Silva, A. J., & Garrido, N. D. (2013). The interaction between intra-cyclic variation of the velocity and mean swimming velocity in young competitive swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(02), 123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1312582
4. Bartolomeu, R. F., Costa, M. J., & Barbosa, T. M. (2018). Contribution of limbs’ actions to the four competitive swimming strokes: A nonlinear approach. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(16), 1836-1845. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1423608
5. Bond, D., Goodson, L., Oxford, S. W., Nevill, A. M., & Duncan, M. J. (2015). The association between anthropometric variables, functional movement screen scores and 100 m freestyle swimming performance in youth swimmers. Sports, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports3010001
6. Callaway, C. W., Chumlea, W. C., Bouchard, C., Himes, J. H., Lohman, T. G., Martin, A. D., Mitchell, C. D., Mueller, W. H., Roche, A. F., & Seefeldt, V. D. (1988). Circumferences. In: Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Lohman T. G., Roche A. F., Martorel R. (Editor). Human Kinetics.
7. Carter, J. E. L., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping-development and applications. Cambridge University Press.
8. Lätt, E., Jürimäe, J., Mäestu, J., Purge, P., Rämson, R., Haljaste, K., Keskinen, K. L., Rodriguez, F. A., & Jürimäe, T. (2010). Physiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmers. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 9(3), 398-404.

9. Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F., & Martorell, R. (1988). Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics.
10. Marinho, B. F., Follmer, B., Del Conti Esteves, J. V., & Andreato, L. V. (2016). Body composition, somatotype, and physical fitness of mixed martial arts athletes. Sport Sciences for Health, 12, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-016-0270-4
11. Muñoz, C., Muros, J. J., López Belmonte, Ó., & Zabala, M. (2020). Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite male young runners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 1-10. Article 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020674
12. Nevill, A. M., Negra, Y., Myers, T. D., Sammoud, S., & Chaabene, H. (2020). Key somatic variables associated with, and differences between the 4 swimming strokes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(7), 787-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1850985
13. Nevill, A. M., Oxford, S., & Duncan, M. J. (2015). Optimal body size and limb-length ratios associated with 100-m PB swim speeds. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(8), 1714–1718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000586.
14. Nicol, E., Pearson, S., Saxby, D., Minahan, C., & Tor, E. (2022). The association of range of motion, dryland strength–power, anthropometry, and velocity in elite breaststroke swimmers. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 17(8), 1222-1230. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2021-0544
15. Ozlu, M., & Akkus, H. (2016). Effects of the anthropometric and kinematic parameters on 50 m freestyle swimming performances. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 18(1), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.15314/tjse.76836
16. Özer, K. (2013). Fiziksel uygunluk (4. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
17. Özkadı, T. (2019). Antropometrik ve motorik becerilerin yüzme performansı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Hitit Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çorum.
18. Özkan, A., Köklü, Y., Eyuboğlu, E., Akça, F., Koz, M., and Ersöz, G. (2010). Kadın voleybolcularda vücut kompozisyonu, somatotip özellikler, anaerobik performans, bacak ve sırt kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(4), 23-34.
19. Penichet-Tomas, A., Pueo, B., Selles-Perez, S., & Jimenez-Olmedo, J. M. (2021). Analysis of anthropometric and body composition profile in male and female traditional rowers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157826
20. Sammoud, S., Nevill, A. M., Negra, Y., Bouguezzi, R., Chaabene, H., & Hachana, Y. (2017). Allometric associations between body size, shape, and 100-m butterfly speed performance. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 58(5), 630–637.
21. Sammoud, S., Nevill, A. M., Negra, Y., Bouguezzi, R., Chaabene, H., & Hachana, Y. (2018). 100-m Breaststroke swimming performance in youth swimmers: the predictive value of Anthropometrics. Pediatric Exercise Science, 30(3), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2017-0220
22. Stager, J. M., & Tanner, D. A. (2008). The Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science: Swimming. Blackwell Science.
23. Tahıllıoğlu, A., Sevim, Y., Pulur, A., Alpkaya, U., and Erol, E. (1999). Yüzücülerde antropometrik ve somatotip özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Spor Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 19-25.
24. Toussaint, H. M., Janssen, T., & Kluft, M. (1991). Effect of propelling surface size on the mechanics and energetics of front crawl swimming. Journal of Biomechanics, 24(3-4), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(91)90178-P
25. Wilmore, J. H., Frisancho, R. A., Gordon, C. C. (1988). Body breath equipment and measurement technique. In: Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F., Marorell, R. (Editör). Human Kinetics.
26. Yarar, H., Baruğ, D., Bostan, A., Kaya, A., & Aydın, E. M. (2021). Influence of physical and anthropometric properties on sprint swimming performance. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 15(2), 814-818.
27. Zamparo, P., Pendergast, D. R., Mollendorf, J., Termin, A., & Minetti, A. E. (2005). An energy balance of front crawl. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1281-4