Relationship between Physical Activity Habits, Aggressive Behaviour and Cyberbullying among Young Adult University Students

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between physical activity habits, aggression, and cyberbullying behaviours among young adult university students. The study was conducted using a convenience sample, and the reliability of the scales was found to be acceptable (α=0.792, α=0.783). The study group consisted of 526 young adult university students who participated in all types of variable-rate (activity duration) and variable-interval (non-periodic) physical activity. While the majority of participants were in the normal BMI range, those who were mildly obese and obese constituted a significant proportion. The predominant motivations for engaging in physical activity were health and fitness, suggesting that these motivations should be considered when designing physical activity programmes. The study revealed no statistically significant difference between gender and participation in physical activity on aggression and cyberbullying, consistent with recent evidence that digital anonymity reduces gender-based aggression patterns. Furthermore, older participants (25-30 years) exhibited marginally higher levels of aggression (M=2.78) compared to their younger peers (M=2.73; p=0.022). The correlation between aggression and cyberbullying was found to be weak (r=.063, p<0.05), and the regression model was non-significant (R2=.004, R2Adj=.002), thus emphasising the multifactorial nature of cyberbullying, which may be attributed to factors such as moral detachment and online anonymity. These findings provide a compelling argument for the implementation of interventions aimed at cultivating digital empathy and the provision of structured physical programmes. Additionally, the necessity for intersectional research to unravel the intricate interplay of cultural and contextual influences on online aggression is underscored.

Keywords

• Aggression behaviour
• Cyberbullying
• Physical activity habits
• Unıversity students
• Young adults

Yetişkin Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Fiziksel Aktivite Alışkanlıkları, Saldırgan Davranışlar ve Siber Zorbalık Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu çalışma, genç yetişkin üniversite öğrencileri arasında fiziksel aktivite alışkanlıkları, saldırganlık ile siber zorbalık davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Araştırma kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeklerin güvenilirliği (α=0.792, α=0.783) kabul edilebilir düzeydedir. Çalışma grubu değişken oranlı (etkinlik süresi) ve değişken aralıklı (periyodik olmayan) fiziksel aktivitenin tüm türlerine katılan 526 genç yetişkin üniversite öğrencisidir. Katılımcıların büyük çoğunluğu normal BKİ aralığında olmakla birlikte, hafif şişman ve şişman bireyler de önemli bir oran oluşturmaktadır. Fiziksel aktivitelere katılma amaçları arasında sağlık ve fit olmak ön plandadır, bu da fiziksel aktivite programlarının tasarlanmasında bu motivasyonların dikkate alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar cinsiyet ve fiziksel aktiviteye katılımın saldırganlık ve siber zorbalık üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığını ortaya koymuş ve dijital anonimliğin cinsiyete dayalı saldırganlık kalıplarını azalttığına dair son kanıtlarla uyum sağlamıştır. Yaşlı katılımcılar (25-30 yaş) genç akranlarına (M=2.73; p=0.022) kıyasla marjinal olarak daha yüksek saldırganlık (M=2.78) sergilemiştir. Saldırganlık ve siber zorbalık arasındaki zayıf korelasyon (r=.063 p<0.05) ve anlamlı olmayan regresyon modeli (R2=.004, R2Adj=.002), siber zorbalığın ahlaki kopukluk ve çevrimiçi anonimlik gibi çok faktörlü köklerini vurgulamıştır. Bu bulgular, dijital empatiyi ve yapılandırılmış fiziksel programları hedefleyen müdahalelerin yanı sıra çevrimiçi saldırganlık üzerindeki kültürel ve bağlamsal etkileri ayrıştırmak için kesişimsel araştırmaları savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Saldırgan davranış
• Siber zorbalık
• Fiziksel aktivite alışkanlıkları
• Üniversite öğrencileri
• Genç yetişkinler

Kaynakça

1. Alleva, N. (2019). Cyberbullying and gender: A qualitative study of how middle school girls experience cyberbullying (Doctoral dissertation). Northeastern University.
2. Almeida, R., Wang, W., & Correia, I. (2022). Cultural values and aggression: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(4), 456-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221088876
3. Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94(4), 1381-1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12507 Arıcak, O. T., Kınay, H., & Tanrıkulu, T. (2012). First psychometric findings of the cyberbullying scale. HAYEF Journal of Education, 9(1), 101–114.
4. AyofeAzeez, N., O.Idiakose, S., JulietOnyema, C., & VanDerVyver, C. (2021). Cyberbullying detection in social networks: Artificial intelligence approach. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 10(4), 745–774. https://doi.org/10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.1046
5. Barlett, C. P. (2019). Predicting cyberbullying: Research, theory, and intervention. Academic Press.
6. Becerra, D. (2017). Cyberbullying and attachment theory: Predictors of cyberbullying behaviours in an undergraduate population (Doctoral dissertation). Pace University.
7. Bender, P. K., Plante, C., & Gentile, D. A. (2018). The effects of violent media content on aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.003
8. Benítez-Sillero, J. D. D., Armada Crespo, J. M., Ruiz Córdoba, E., & Raya-González, J. (2021). Relationship between amount, type, enjoyment of physical activity and physical education performance with cyberbullying in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042038

9. Bermejo-Cantarero, A., Álvarez-Bueno, C., Martínez-Vizcaino, V., Redondo-Tébar, A., Pozuelo-Carrascosa, D. P., & Sánchez-López, M. (2021). Relationship between both cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Health and quality of life outcomes, 19, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01766-0
10. Biddle, S. J., & Asare, M. (2020). Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: A review of reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11), 886–895. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090185
11. Bossler, A. M., & Berenblum, T. (2019). Introduction: New directions in cybercrime research. Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(5), 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1692426
12. Bostancı-Bozbayındır, G. (2019). Cyberbullying and criminal law. Istanbul Law Review, 77(1), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.01.0009
13. Boxer, P., & Tisak, M. S. (2005). Children's beliefs about the continuity of aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 31(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20056
14. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
15. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
17. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
18. deDiosBenítez-Sillero, J., Corredor-Corredor, D., ManuelMartínez-Aranda, L., Abellán-Aynés, O., Portela-Pino, I., & Raya-González, J. (2023). Relationship between physical fitness and cyberbullying patterns (cybervictimization and cyberperpetration) in Spanish adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 13, Article 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110952
19. Demirtaş-Madran, H. A. (2012). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish form of Buss-Perry aggression scale. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 24(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5080/u6859
20. Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy‐related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
21. Erbiçer, E. S., Ceylan, V., Yalçın, M. H., Erbicer, S., Akın, E., Koçtürk, N., & Doğan, T. (2023). Cyberbullying among children and youth in Türkiye: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 73, 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.09.003
22. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
23. Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, I., K.Smith, P., & Calvete, E. (2013). Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression substance use and problematic internet use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(4), 446 – 452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.030
24. Gençdoğan, B., & Çikrıkci, Ö. (2015). Validity and reliability studies of Turkish forms of e-bullying and e-victimization scale. Theory and Practice in Education, 11(1), 359-373.
25. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
26. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132(4), 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0614
27. Giumetti, G. W., Kowalski, R. M., & Feinn, R. S. (2022). Predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying among college students: A two wave study. Aggressive Behavior, 48(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21992
28. Guthold, R., A.Stevens, G., M.Riley, L., & C.Bull, F. (2018). Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. The Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7
29. Haber, J. D., & Haber, S. B. (2007). Cyberbullying: A “virtual” camp nightmare? Camping Magazine, 80, 52-57.
30. Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., & Heerde, J. A. (2015). Longitudinal associations between cyberbullying perpetration and victimization and problem behavior and mental health problems in young Australians. International Journal of Public Health, 60, 227-237.
31. Henson, B. (2012). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Security Journal, 25, 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2011.25
32. Hill, E. E., Zack, E., Battaglini, C., Viru, M., Viru, A., & Hackney, A. C. (2008). Exercise and circulating cortisol levels: The intensity threshold effect. Journal of Endocrinology Investigation, 31(7), 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03345606
33. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behaviour, 29(2), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
34. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
35. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2018). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1492417
36. Hofstede, G. (2013). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
37. Hu, Y., Bai, Y., Pan, Y., & Li, S. (2021). Cyberbullying victimization and depression among adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 305, Article 114198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114198
38. Jensen-Arnett, J. (2023). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
39. Karakuş, S., & Turan, S. G. (2022). Examining the relationship between adults' cyberbullying behaviours and digital citizenship skills. Pamukkale University Social Sciences Institute Journal, (49), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.983075
40. Kraft, E. M., & Wang, J. (2010). An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 74-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jte.2010100106
41. Lam, L. T., & Li, Y. (2013). The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.021
42. Leung, A. N. M., Wong, N., & Farver, J. M. (2018). Cyberbullying in Hong Kong Chinese students: Life satisfaction, and the moderating role of friendship qualities on cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.016
43. Li, C., Wang, P., Martin-Moratinos, M., Bella-Fernández, M., & Blasco-Fontecilla, H. (2024). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying in the digital age and its associated mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(9), 2895-2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02128-x
44. Lin, T.-W., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2013). Exercise benefits brain function: The monoamine connection. Brain Sciences, 3(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci3010039
45. Lubans, D., Richards, J., Hillman, C., Faulkner, G., Beauchamp, M., Nilsson, M., ... & Biddle, S. (2016). Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics, 138(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1642
46. LuisUbago-Jiménez, J., Cepero-González, M., Martínez-Martínez, A., & Chacón-Borrego, F. (2021). Linking emotional intelligence physical activity and aggression among undergraduates. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(23), Article 12477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312477
47. Marciano, L., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A. L. (2022). Artificial intelligence in cyberbullying detection: Ethical and practical challenges. Computers in Human Behaviour, 134, 107327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107327
48. Morgan, C. T., & Arıcı, H. (1981). Introduction to psychology: Textbook. Hacettepe University.
49. Nesin, S. M., Sharma, K., Burghate, K. N., & Anthony, M. (2025). Neurobiology of emotional regulation in cyberbullying victims. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1473807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473807
50. Parks, J., Quarterman, J., & Thibault, L. (2003). Contemporary sport management (3. ed.). (N. Mirzeoğlu, Trans.). Academician Publishing (3rd Edt.), 6-7.
51. Pitts, B., Fielding, L. W., & Miller, L. K. (1994). Industry segmentation theory and the sport industry: Developing a sport industry segment model. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 3(1), 15-24.
52. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
53. Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
54. Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
55. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
56. Tabuk, M. E., & Karadağ, A. (2022). Investigation of corporate Twitter accounts of Beşiktaş, Fenerbahçe, Galatasaray and Trabzonspor clubs: A methodological study. Journal of National Sport Science, 6(2), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.30769/usbd.1211775
57. Tabuk, M. E. (2023). Determination of the relationship between attitude towards food supplements and physical health perception. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 6(3), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1323578
58. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
59. Talwar, V., Gomez-Garibello, C., & Shariff, S. (2023). Sampling biases in aggression research: A systematic review. Aggressive Behaviour, 49(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22088
60. Tran, H. G. N., Thai, T. T., Dang, N. T. T., Vo, D. K., & Duong, M. H. T. (2021). Cyber-Victimization and its effect on depression in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 1124-1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211050597
61. Tremblay, R. E. (2023). Developmental origins of aggression. Guilford Press.
62. Volk, A. A., Andrews, N. C., & Dane, A. V. (2022). Balance of power and adolescent aggression. Psychology of Violence, 12(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000398
63. Warburton, D. E. R., Nicol, C. W., & Bredin, S. S. D. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 801-809. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051351
64. Watts, L. K., Wagner, J., Velasquez, B., & Behrens, P. I. (2017). Cyberbullying in higher education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.038
65. Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Research Press.
66. Wilson, D., Witherup, K., & Payne, A. A. (2020). Risk and protective factors for cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. In T. J. Holt & A. M. Bossler (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance (pp. 1257-1281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_56
67. Yaman, E., Eroğlu, Y., & Peker, A. (2011). Coping strategies and school bullying and cyberbullying. Kaknüs Publications.
68. Yaşartürk, F., Akay, B. & Kul, M. (2022). Investigation of negotiating with the barriers of leisure activities and agressive behavior in university students. CBU Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 17(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1128967
69. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2014). SPSS applied scientific research methods. Detay Publishing.
70. Zhu, Y., Li, J., Zhang, M., Li, C., Lau, E. Y. H., & Tao, S. (2022). Physical activity participation and physical aggression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 63, Article 102288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102288