A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications Related to Leisure and Culture

Abstract

The scholarly investigation into the multifaceted role of leisure across diverse social groups, particularly its associations with psychosocial and cognitive outcomes, has expanded significantly. However, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis synthesizing the research landscape specifically within the domain of leisure and culture remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by conducting a bibliometric review to provide a comprehensive overview of the scientific literature and identify key research trends in this interdisciplinary field. Publications from the Web of Science (WoS) database, covering the period from 1981 to June 25, 2025, were retrieved using a search strategy confined to titles, abstracts, and keywords. Key bibliometric indicators, including publication year, authors, subject areas, countries, keywords, and sources, were systematically analysed. The extracted WoS data were subsequently processed using VOSviewer software to perform bibliometric mapping, specifically focusing on co-authorship and co-occurrence analyses. The analysis revealed that the highest volume of publications occurred in 2020 (n=219 articles). Leisure Sciences emerged as the most prolific journal, contributing six (n=6) studies to the field. The most frequently cited research areas were identified as Hospitality Leisure Sport Tourism, Sociology, and History. Furthermore, the five concepts with the highest co-occurrence were leisure (n=18), culture (n=14), subjective well-being (n=3), leisure satisfaction (n=3), and leisure time (n=3). Geographically, the United States and the United Kingdom were identified as the leading contributing countries, with Türkiye ranking 24th with 36 publications. These findings offer valuable insights into the historical development and current trends within the global literature on leisure and culture, thereby providing a robust foundation to inform and guide future research endeavours in this interdisciplinary field. This study contributes to the literature by offering a systematic understanding of the intersection between leisure and culture, thereby highlighting its significance for advancing interdisciplinary research and practice.

Keywords

• Bibliometrics
• Culture
• Leisure

Kaynakça

1. Arab-Moghaddam, N., Henderson, K. A., & Sheikholeslami, R. (2007). Women’s leisure and constraints to participation: Iranian perspectives. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950100
2. Archer, M. S., & Elder-Vass, D. (2012). Cultural system or norm circles? An exchange. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423592
3. Arosteguy, A., & Gomes, C. L. (2023). Leisure, culture and territory: A social cartography in two suburbs of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 53(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2023.2172121
4. Auger, D., & St-Laurent, M. (2018). Anniversary issue: 40 years of research in leisure, culture and tourism. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 41(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2018.1438122
5. Avcı Taşkıran, T., & Gürbüz, B. (2021). The investigation of the relationship between perceived freedom and brief resilience: The role of participation in physical activity. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 13(5), 3. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.2021.Suppl.1.03
6. Bürkner, H. J., & Totelecan, S. G. (2018). Assemblages of urban leisure culture in Inner‐City Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(5), 786-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12630
7. Carlino, G. A., & Saiz, A. (2019). Beautiful city: Leisure amenities and urban growth. Journal of Regional Science, 59(3), 369-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12438
8. Chick, G., Dong, E., Yeh, C. K., & Hsieh, C. M. (2021). Cultural consonance predicts leisure satisfaction in Taiwan. Leisure Studies, 40(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1808052

9. Chick, G., Hsu, Y. C., Yeh, C. K., Hsieh, C. M., Bae, S. Y., & Iarmolenko, S. (2016). Cultural consonance in leisure, leisure satisfaction, life satisfaction, and self-rated health in urban Taiwan. Leisure Sciences, 38(5), 402-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1141734
10. Choe, Y., & Baek, J. (2023). Unlocking happiness: Assessing the monetary value of leisure activities on subjective well-being. Healthcare, 11(21), 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11212884
11. Dattilo, J. (2021). Leisure education program planning: A systematic approach. Sagamore-Venture.
12. Day, M., & Sullivan, C. T. (2024). Indigenous peoples, digital leisure, and popular culture. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 20(2), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241256115
13. Doğan, M., & Gürbüz, B. (2025). Türkiye’s leisure repertoire: The cultural consonance paradox on the path to perceived health and happiness. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 48(2), 320–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2025.2524195
14. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
15. Du, J., Floyd, C., Kim, A. C., Baker, B. J., Sato, M., James, J. D., & Funk, D. C. (2021). To be or not to be: Negotiating leisure constraints with technology and data analytics amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Leisure Studies, 40(4), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1862284
16. Eagleton, T. (2016). Culture. Yale University Press.
17. Gallistl, V., & Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: A study of older internet users. Leisure Studies, 39(2), 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1694568
18. Gürbüz, B. (2017). The conception and perception of leisure in Turkey. In K. Henderson, & A. Sivan (Eds), Leisure from International Voices. Sagamore Publishing.
19. Gürbüz, B., & Henderson, K. (2014). Leisure activity preferences and constraints to leisure: perspectives from Turkey. World Leisure Journal, 56(4), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2014.958195
20. Ho, C. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2024). Social media as a pathway to leisure: Digital leisure culture among new mothers with young children in Taiwan. Leisure Sciences, 46(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2021.2007823
21. Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2023). Leisure and meaning in life. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1074649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074649
22. Ito, E., Walker, G. J., Liu, H., & Mitas, O. (2017). A cross-cultural/national study of Canadian, Chinese, and Japanese university students' leisure satisfaction and subjective well-being. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1165637
23. Iwasaki, Y. (2007). Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: What are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life?. Social Indicators Research, 82, 233-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9032-z
24. Kamath, S. S., & Dsouza, S. A. (2025). Postretirement leisure participation in a collective culture: Experiences and perspectives of older adults and family members in an Indian metropolis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 40(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-025-09528-x
25. Konoike, S., Bando, H., & Takenaka, M. (2022). Development of health literacy from activities of culture, leisure, and sports. Research Journal of Sports and Health Psychology, 4(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.36266/RJSHP/131
26. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
27. Rojek, C. (2022). Globalization, cosmopolitanism, and leisure rights: The flaws of the Sao Paulo Declaration. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 45(1), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2022.2053327
28. Schoemaker, J. (2023). A review of well-being valuation for sports, culture and leisure activities. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 4997. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064997
29. Schupp, K. (2020). I can’t. I have dance: dance competition culture as serious leisure and pre-professional training. Leisure Studies, 39(4), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2019.1643902
30. Stebbins, R. A. (2015). Leisure and the motive to volunteer: Theories of serious, casual, and project-based leisure. Springer.
31. Wang, J. (2001). Culture as leisure and culture as capital. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 9(1), 69-104. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-9-1-69
32. Wheatley, D., & Bickerton, C. (2024). Valuing subjective well-being benefits from leisure activities: informing post-Covid public funding of arts, culture and sport. Annals of Leisure Research, 27(2), 274-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2022.2099436
33. Wheatley, D., & Bickerton, C. (2017). Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-016-9270-0
34. Yalçın, C., Altındöker, M., & Yıldız, H. (2025). The moderating role of leisure satisfaction in the effect of peer relationships on happiness in adolescents. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v6i1.278
35. Yang, S., Ye, S., & Li, H. (2022). Comparison of senior leisure activities in China and the United States from the perspective of cultural differences. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1), 8430490. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8430490
36. Yıldız, K., Eroğlu, Y. & Beşikçi, T. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of outdoor education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multi Dimensiona, 14 (1Sup1), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1Sup1/550
37. Yin, X. (2005). New trends of leisure consumption in China. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(1), Article 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-004-1419-x
38. Yoo, J. (2022). Attitude toward leisure, satisfaction with leisure policy, and happiness are mediated by satisfaction with leisure activities. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16012-w