Perceptions of Leadership in Sports Management Feature and Skills Case Study: Manisa Celal Bayar University Sample

Abstract

Leadership plays a "key role" in terms of achieving success in an organization. When the literature is examined, it is expected that the logical direction contained in managers and the specifications like imagination and creativity contained in leaders need to come under the concept of "leader-manager". The study emphasizes that: being theoretical weighted and not being application oriented in a professional sense of the School Faculty of Sport Sciences Sports Management Department causes inadequate leadership skills and abilities of students and the deficiencies relating to this issue may be filled by giving "practical leadership training". From this point of view, the intention in this research is to present perceptions about leadership of the participants and determine the current situation. In the research, one of the qualitative research methods, case study methods, is used. In the research, mixed sampling method was used. The sample of the research is formed by five instructors who work in Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Sport Sciences Sports Management Department, five graduates from the Sports Management Department and ten students who are still studying. An interview approach was used as a method of data collection and interviews were conducted using the interview form. Data analysis was evaluated by descriptive analysis. As a result of face to face interviews with participants, the participants’ perceptions of leadership have been demonstrated by thematizing with the findings related to the gain of leadership qualities and skills. Also, it is determined that the leadership qualities and skills and awareness of the participants are higher compared to the other departments of Faculty of Sport Sciences and studying in this department contributes to career development.

Keywords

• Academician,leadership,student,sports management department

Spor Yönetiminde Liderlik Özellik ve Beceri Algıları: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Liderlik örgütte başarının sağlanabilmesi açısından “anahtar görevi” görmektedir. Literatür incelendiğinde yöneticilerde bulunan mantıksal yönün liderlerde bulunan hayal ve yaratıcılık gibi özelliklerin “lider-yönetici” kavramı altında toplanması gerektiği düşünülmektedir. Araştırmada Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Spor Yöneticiliği Bölümünde yer alan derslerin teorik ağırlıklı olup, mesleki anlamda uygulamaya dönük olmaması, öğrencilerin liderlik beceri ve özelliklerinin yetersiz kalmasına ve bu sorunlara ilişkin eksikliklerin öğrencilere “uygulamaya yönelik liderlik eğitimi”nin verilmesiyle kapatılabileceği vurgulanmıştır. Bu noktadan hareketle araştırmada katılımcıların liderlik ile ilgili algılarının ortaya konulup, mevcut durumun tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada; nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada karma örneklem metodu kullanılmıştır. Örneklemi, Manisa Celal Bayar Universitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Spor Yöneticiliği Bölümü’nde görev yapan 5 öğretim elemanı, Spor Yöneticiliği Bölümü’nden mezun 5 kişi ve öğrenimine devam eden 10 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama yöntemi olarak ise görüşme yaklaşımı kullanılmış ve görüşmeler, görüşme formu kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri analizleri betimsel analiz yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiştir. Katılımcılar ile yapılan yüz yüze görüşmeler sonucunda katılımcıların liderlik algıları, liderlik özellik ve becerilerinin kazandırılmasına ilişkin bulgular temalandırılarak ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca katılımcıların liderlik özellik ve becerilerinin Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi’nin diğer bölümlere göre farkındalıklarının yüksek olduğu ve bu bölümde eğitim almanın kariyer basamaklarına katkı sağladığına dair sonuçlar tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akademisyen,liderlik,öğrenci,spor yöneticiliği bölümü

Kaynakça

1. Atar, E., & Ozbek O. (2009). The leadership behaviours of the school of physical education and sports students, Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 7(2), 51-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000150.
2. Aydın, M. (2013). Organizational behavior in education. Ankara: Pegem.
3. Bennis, W. (2003). On becoming a leader (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
4. Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1.1.729.7350.
6. Cox, D., & Hoover, J. (2003). Leadership when the heat's on. Mahmut Tuna (Ed.), İstanbul: System.
7. Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 149–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.40619980906.
8. DuBrin, A. J. (2004). Instructor’s resource manual with test bank, leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

9. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A Longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659.
10. Eren, E. (2012). Management and organization. İstanbul: Beta.
11. Fındıkçı, I. (2009). A journey of heart: Servant leadership. Istanbul: Alfa.
12. Genç, N. (1997). The road to the summit: Management. İstanbul: Timaş.
13. Gökçe, Z., Çam, I., & Yazıcılar, I. (2008). Investigoting the leadership dimensions of sport of sport managers (Example of Aegean Zone). Journal of Sports Management and Information Technology, 3(1), 6-13.
14. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Education management. S. Turan (Ed.). Ankara: Nobel.
15. Özkalp, E. (2005). Organizational behavior. Eskişehir: Anadolu.
16. Koçel, T. (2010). Business management. İstanbul: Beta.
17. Leahey, J., & Kotter, J.P. (1990). Changing the culture at british airways. Bedford: European Case Clearing House
18. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J. & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6.
19. Lunenburg, F. C. (2012). Power and leadership: An influence process. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1-9.
20. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. CA: Sage.
21. Ogurlu, U. (2012). The effect of leadership skills development program on gifted and nongifted students leadership skill. Doctoral Thesis, Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
22. Parlak, B. (2011). Management science and contemporary management techniques. Istanbul: Beta.
23. Sabuncuoğlu, Z., & Tüz, M. V. (2013). Organizational behavior. Bursa: Aktüel.
24. Sarvan, F. (1990). New developments in the search for leadership and managers' view of leadership. Management Clup Work, Marmara University, Istanbul.
25. Sousa, M. J. & Rocha, Á. (2019). Leadership styles and skills developed through game-based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94(C), 360-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.057.
26. Swanwick, T. (2019). Leadership and management: What’s the difference?. BMJ Leader, 3,99-100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/leader-2019-000153.
27. Şirin, E.F. (2008). Leadership styles of physical education and sports school managers and study of conflict management strategies, Doctoral Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
28. Taşdan, N., & Gül, H. (2013). Leadership and district governorship in public administration. Ankara: Detay.
29. Tengilimoğlu, D. (2005). A field survey aimed at determination of behavior characteristics of private and public sector organization leaders. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 1-16.
30. Werner, I. (1993). Leadership and management. Vedat Üner (Ed.). Istanbul: Rota.
31. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (2018). Research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin.
32. Zaleznik, A. (1995). Strategic management and leadership. Ufuk Uyan (Ed.). Istanbul: Iz.