Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?

Ayşegül Kayaoğlu

TR EN

Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?

Öz

This paper analyses intimate partner violence in Turkey which faces an enormous increase in femicide cases over the last decade. Analyzing a very rich nationwide representative survey, we show that relative status of women in terms of income and education affect different types of domestic violence, ranging from emotional abuse to physical and sexual violence. Besides, factors related to marriage setting have a significant role in the effect of women’s superior status on intimate partner violence. Overall, we provide evidence to support the relative resource theory and invalidate the intra-household bargaining model in the Turkish case.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abuse, Abuse, domestic violence, female employment, education, gender inequality, Turkey

Kaynakça

Aizer, A. (2010), “The Gender Wage Gap and Domestic Violence,” American Economic Review, 100 (4): 1847-59.
Akar, T., F. N. Aksakal, B. Demirel, E. Durukan and S. Ozkan. (2010), “The Prevalence of Domestic Violence Against Women Among a Group Woman: Ankara, Turkey,” Journal of Family Violence, 25: 449-460.
Albo, X. (1994), “Ethnic Violence: The Case of Bolivia,” in K. Rupesinghe and M. Rubio C. eds., The Culture of Violence, New York, United Nations University Press, 119-143.
Altinay, A. G. and Y. Arat (2008), Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Şiddet, ISBN: 978-975-01103-2-0, Istanbul.
Anderberg, D., H. Rainer, J. Wadsworth and T. Wilson (2016), “Unemployment and Domestic Violence: Theory and Evidence,” The Economic Journal, 126 (597): 1947-1979.
Anderson, K. (1997), “Gender, Status, and Domestic Violence: An Integration of Feminist and Family Violence Approaches,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59: 655-669.
Angelucci, M. (2008), “Love on The Rocks: Domestic Violence and Alcohol Abuse in Rural Mexico,” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1): 1-43.
Atkinson, M. P., T. N. Greenstein and M. M. Lang. 2005. For Women, Breadwinning Can Be Dangerous: Gendered Resource Theory and Wife Abuse,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67(5): 1137-1148.
Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu. (1995), Aile İçi Şiddetin Sebep ve Sonuçları: Aralık 1993- Aralık 1994, ISBN: 975-19-1229-6, Ankara.
Bandura, A. (1973), Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

Bloch, F. and V. Rao (2002), Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4): 1029-1043.
Burgess, R. L. and P. Draper (1989), “The Explanation of Family Violence: The Role of Biological, Behavioral, and Cultural Selection,” Crime and Justice, 11: 59-116.
Card, D. and G. B. Dahl (2011), “Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Violent Behavior,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1): 103-143.
Chin, Y. (2012), “Male Backlash, Bargaining, or Exposure Reduction?: Women’s Working Status and Physical Spousal Violence in India,” Journal of Population Economics, 25(1): 175-200.
Daly, K. and M. Chesney-Lind (1988), “Feminism and Criminology,” Justice Quarterly, 5: 497-538.
DeMaris, A., M. L. Benson, G. L. Fox, T. Hill and J. Van Wyk (2003), “Distal and Proximal Factors in Domestic Violence: A Test of an Integrated Model,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65: 652-667.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1988), Woman abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support, Toronto, Canadian Scholars' Press.
DeKeseredy, W. S. and M. D. “Schwartz (2002), “Theorizing Public Housing Woman Abuse as a Function of Eco- Nomic Exclusion and Male Peer Support,” Women’s Health and Urban Life, 1: 26-45.
DeKeseredy, Walter S., and M. D. Schwartz. 2011. “Theoretical and Definitional Issues in Violence Against Women,” in Renzetti, C. M., Edleson, J. L., and Bergen, R. K. eds., Sourcebook on violence against women, 2nd edition, Sage.
Dugan, L., D. Nagin and R. Rosenfeld (1999), “Explaining the Decline in Intimate Partner Homicide: The Effect of Changing Domesticity, Women’s Status and Domestic Violence Resources,” Homicide Studies, 3(3): 187-214.
Dutton, D. G. and A. Starzomski (1993), “Borderline Personality in Perpetrators of Psychological and Physical Abuse,” Violence and Victims, 8(4): 327-337.
Dutton, D. G., K. Saunders, A. Starzomski and K. Bartholomew (1994), “Intimacy‐Anger and Insecure Attachment as Precursors of Abuse in Intimate Relationships,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15): 1367-1386.
Dutton, D. G. (2006), Rethinking Domestic Violence, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press.
Elbogen, E. B. and S. Johnson (2009), “The Intricate Link Between Violence and Mental Disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(2): 152-161.
Erten, B., and P. Keskin (2016), “For Better or for Worse?: Education and the Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Turkey,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10 (1): 64-104.
Fagan, A. A. (2005), “The Relationship Between Adolescent Physical Abuse and Criminal Offending: Support for an Enduring and Generalized Cycle of Violence,” Journal of Family Violence, 20(5): 279-290.
Fox, G. L., M. L. Benson, A. A. DeMaris and J. Van Wyk (2002), “Economic Distress and Intimate Violence: Testing Family Stress and Resources Theories,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(3): 793-807.
Gelles, R. J. (1974), The violent home, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
Güler, N., H. Tel and F. Özkan Tuncay (2005), “Kadının Aile İçinde Yaşanan Şiddete Bakışı,” [The View of Women to the Violence Experienced within the Family], C. Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (2), 51–56. http://www.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/edergi/makale/1104.pdf
Goetz, A. M. and R. S. Gupta (1996), “Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power, and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programs in Bangladesh,” World Development, 24(1), 45-63.
Jasinski, J. L. (2001), “Theoretical Explanations for Violence Against Women,” in C. M Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen, eds., Sourcebook on Violence Against Women, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage: 5-22.
Johnson, H. (1996), Dangerous Domains: Violence Against Women in Canada, Scarborough, ON, Nelson Canada.
Kayaoglu, A. (2020), “Labour Market Impact of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The View of Employers in Informal Textile Sector in Istanbul,” Migration Letters, 17 (5): 583-595. Kalmuss, D. S. and M. A. Straus (1982), “Wife's Marital Dependency and Wife Abuse,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(2): 277-286.
Luke, N. and K. Munshi (2011), “Women as Agents of Change: Female Income and Mobility in India,” Journal of Development Economics, 94(1): 1-17.
Macmillan, R. and R. Gartner (1999), “When She Brings Home the Bacon: Labor-Force Participation and The Risk of Spousal Violence Against Women,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4): 947-958.
McCloskey, L. A. (1996), “Socioeconomic and Coercive Power within the Family,” Gender and Society, 10(4): 449–463.
Melzer, S. A. (2002), “Gender, Work, and Intimate Violence: Men's Occupational Violence Spillover and Compensatory Violence,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(4): 820–832.
Molm, L. D. (1997), “Risk and Power Use: Constraints on the Use of Coercion in Exchange,” American Sociological Review, 62(1): 113-133.
O’Brian, J. E. (1971), “Violence in Divorce Prone Families,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 64: 692-698.
Raphael, J. (2001), “Public Housing and Domestic Violence,” Violence Against Women, 7: 699-706.
Sernau, S. (2001), Worlds Apart: Social Inequalities in a New Century, Thousand Oaks, CA, Pine Forge Press.
Strauss, M. A. (1991), “New Theory and Old Canards About Family Violence Research,” Social Problems, 38: 180-197.
Straus, M. A., R. J. Gelles and S. Steinmetz (1980), Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, New York, Anchor.
Warnken, W. J., A. Rosenbaum, K. Fletcher, S. K. Hoge and S. A. Adelman (1994), “Head-Injured Males: A Population at Risk for Relationship Aggression?” Violence and Victims, 9(2): 153-166.
Weitzman, A. (2014), “Women’s and Men’s Relative Status and Intimate Partner Violence in India,” Population and Development Review, 40: 55-75
We Will Stop Femicide Platform (2020), 2019 Statistics Report. Retrieved from http://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net/veriler/2890/2019-report-of-we-will-end-femicide-platform [last accessed at 03 October 2020]
World Health Organization, (2018), Addressing Violence Against Women: Key Achievements And Priorities, Geneva, World Health Organization. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Yllo, K. and M. Straus (1990), “Patriarchy and Violence Against Wives: The Impact of Structural and Normative Factors,” in M. Straus, and R. Gelles, eds., Physical Violence in American Families, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ayşegül Kayaoğlu Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Eylül 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Temmuz 2020

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG

APA

Kayaoğlu, A. (2020). Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence? Ekonomi-tek, 9(3), 161-185. https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG

AMA

1.Kayaoğlu A. Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence? Ekonomi-tek. 2020;9(3):161-185. https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG

Chicago

Kayaoğlu, Ayşegül. 2020. “Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?”. Ekonomi-tek 9 (3): 161-85. https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG.

EndNote

Kayaoğlu A (01 Eylül 2020) Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence? Ekonomi-tek 9 3 161–185.

IEEE

[1]A. Kayaoğlu, “Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?”, Ekonomi-tek, c. 9, sy 3, ss. 161–185, Eyl. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG

ISNAD

Kayaoğlu, Ayşegül. “Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?”. Ekonomi-tek 9/3 (01 Eylül 2020): 161-185. https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG.

JAMA

1.Kayaoğlu A. Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence? Ekonomi-tek. 2020;9:161–185.

MLA

Kayaoğlu, Ayşegül. “Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?”. Ekonomi-tek, c. 9, sy 3, Eylül 2020, ss. 161-85, https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG.

Vancouver

1.Ayşegül Kayaoğlu. Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence? Ekonomi-tek [Internet]. 01 Eylül 2020;9(3):161-85. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA48DX73EG

Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?

Kadının Göreli Statüsü ve Evlilik Özellikleri Aile İçi Şiddet İçin Önemli mi?

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Do Relative Status of Women and Marriage Characteristics Matter for the Intimate Partner Violence?

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster