Türk İmalat Sektöründe Dışa Açıklık ve Verimlilik

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 1 - 23, 01.05.2019

Alpay Filiztekin

Öz

Bu çalışma ekonominin serbestleşmesi öncesi ve sonrası Türk imalat sanayisinde verimlilik büyümesinin dinamiklerini inceliyor. Makale, sektör düzeyinde veri kullanarak, ithal ikameci sanayileşmeden dışa yönelik stratejiye geçişin büyüme performansını ve verimliliğini geliştirdiğini ve bunun neredeyse katma değer artışının yarısını sağladığını gösteriyor. Ayrıca, artan ihracat verimliliği anlamlı olarak etkilenmezken, reform sonrası daha güçlü rekabet ile yüz yüze gelen endüstrilerde daha yüksek verimlilik artışının gözlendiğine dair işaretler de bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dış ticarette serbestleşme, toplam faktör verimliliği büyümesi, Türkiye

Openness and Productivity Growth in Turkish Manufacturing

Öz

This paper examines the dynamics of productivity growth in Turkish manufacturing industry before and after the liberalization of the economy. Using industry level data, the paper shows that the move from import-substituting industrialization to an outward-oriented strategy improved growth performance and it is productivity that is responsible for almost half of the growth in value added. There is also evidence that industries that face stronger competition after reform observed higher productivity growth rates whereas increased exports do not significantly affect productivity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Trade liberalization, total factor productivity growth, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
• Aricanli, T. and D. Rodrik (1990), The Political Economy of Turkey: Debt, Adjustment and Sustainability. Saint Martin’s Press, New York.
• Aw, B., X. Chen and M. Roberts (1997), “Firm-level Evidence on Productivity Differentials, Turnover and Exports in Taiwanese Manufacturing,” NBER Working Paper No.: 6235.
• Bernard, A. and C. Jones (1999), “Exporting and Productivity,” NBER Working Paper No.: 7135.
• Baysan, T. and Blitzer (1990), “Turkey’s Trade Liberalization in the 1980s and Prospects for Sustainability” in Aricanli and Rodrik, eds., The Political Economy of Turkey: Debt, Adjustment and Sustainability.
• Clerides, S., S. Lach and J. Tybout (1998), “Is Learning-by-Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco,” Quartery Journal of Economics, 113, 903-947.
• Connolly, M. (1998), “The Dual Nature of Trade: Measuring its Impact on Imitation and Growth,” Duke University Department of Economics Working Paper, No: 97/34.
• Dollar, D. (1992), “Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40, 523-544.
• Edwards, S. (1998), “Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?” Economic Journal, 108(July), 383-398.
• Feeney, J. (1999), “International Risk Sharing, Learning by Doing, and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 58, 297-318.
• Foroutan, F. (1996), “Turkey 1976-85: Foreign Trade, Industrial Productivity and Competition,” in M. J. Roberts and J. R. Tybout, eds., Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries, A World Bank Book, Washington.
• Grossman, G. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press.
• Harrigan J. (1999), “Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions,” Journal of International Economics, 47, 267-293.
• Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey and H. Rosen (1988), “Estimating Vector Autoregressions With Panel Data,” Econometrica, 56, 1371-1395.
• Kim, E. (2000), “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries: Price Protection, Market Power and Scale Efficiency,” Journal of Development Economics, 62, 55-83.
• Krueger, A. and B. Tuncer (1982), “Growth of Factor Productivity in Turkish Mnufacturing Industry,” Journal of Development Economics, 11, 307-325.
• Levinsohn, J. (1993), “Testing the Imports-as-Market-Discipline Hypothesis,” Journal of International Economics, 35, 1-22.
• Nishimizu, M and S. Robinson (1984), “Trade Policies and Productivity Change in Semi-industrialized Countries,” Journal of Development Economics, 16, 177-206.
• Pavcnik, N. (2002), “Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants,” Review of Economic Studies, 68, 245-276.
• Rodriguez, F. and D. Rodrik (1999), “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-national Evidence,” NBER Working Paper No.: 7081.
• Rodrik, D. (1995), “Trade and Industrial Policy Reform,” in J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam.
• Sachs, J. and A. Warner (1995), “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, No: 1, 1-118.
• Senses, F. (1994), Recent industrialization experience of Turkey in a global context. Contributions in Economics and Economic History, no. 155. Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press, 1994
• Togan, S. (undated), 1980’li Yillarda Turk Dis Ticaret Rejimi ve Dis Ticartein Liberlizasyonu. Turk Eximbank Arastima Dizisi 1.
• Togan, S. and V. N. Balasubramanyam (1996), The Economy of Turkey Since Liberalization. New York: St. Martin's Press; London: Macmillan Press.
• Young, A. (1995), “The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting The Statistical Realities of The East Asian Growth Experience,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, 641-680.