REFERENCE GROUPS AND HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 71 - 107, 01.01.2016

Ünay Tamgaç Tezcan

Öz

It is well-known that relative concern influences many economic choices, including consumption decisions. Recently, several studies have linked the gradually falling savings rate in the United States since the 1980s with both relative concern and increased inequality. In this paper, we test for the presence of relative concern (i.e., peer effects) in consumption decisions for Turkey. In particular, we test whether households are affected by the purchases of other households who constitute their reference group. This is one of the few studies that investigate relative concern in a developing-country setting. Drawing on nationally representative data from the Turkish Household Budget Survey for the years 2003-2012, we examine different reference groups comprised of members having the same education level, urban-rural residence status, or age range. We find that the hypothesis is validated and that non-rich households are affected by perceiving the consumption of more prosperous individuals of the same educational background. However, we do not observe any group effects for upper-income households.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Household expenditures, reference group, peer effects, developing country, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Affleck, G. & Tennen, H., (1991), “Social Comparison and Coping with Major Medical Problems”, in Suls, J. and Wills, T. A., eds., Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• Akkoyunlu, S., (2002), “Modeling Consumers’ Expenditure in Turkey. (1962- 1999),” 1st Oxmetrics User Conference, Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School, London. Available: https://www.cass.city.ac.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0003/65280/Sakkoyun.pdf [November 21, 2016]
• Akpınar, M. G., Dağıstan, E., Mazlum, Y., Gul, M., Koç, B., & Yılmaz, Y., (2009), “Determining Household Preferences for Fish Consumption with Conjoint Analysis in Turkey,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8, 2215-2222.
• Alessie, R., & Kapteyn, A., (1991), “Habit Formation, Interdependent Preferences, and Demographic Effects in the Almost Ideal Demand System”, Economic J., 101 (406), 404-419.
• Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M.S., (2008), “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90 (2), 300-323.
• Aydede, Y., (2008), “Aggregate Consumption Function and Public Social Security: The First Time-Series Study for a Developing Country, Turkey,” Applied Economics, 40 (14), 1807-1826.
• Bertrand, M., & Morse, A., (2016), “Trickle-Down Consumption,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98 (5), 863-879.
• Bolton, G. E. & Ockenfels, A., (2000), “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition,” American Economic Review, 90 (1), 166-193.
• Brown, J. D. & Dutton, K. A., (1995), “Truth and Consequences: The Cost and Benefits of Accurate Self-Knowledge,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (2), 1288-1296.
• Browning, M., & Lusardi, A., (1996), “Household Saving: Micro Theories and Micro Facts,” Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1797-1855.
• Bygren, M., (2004), “Pay Reference Groups and Pay Satisfaction. What Do Workers Evaluate Their Pay Against?” Social Science Research, 33, 206-24.
• Çağlayan, E. & Astar, M., (2012), “A Microeconometric Analysis of Household Consumption Expenditure Determinants for both Rural and Urban Areas in Turkey,” American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2 (2), February.
• Çelen, A., (2015), “Influence of Holy Month Ramadan on Alcohol Consumption in Turkey,” Journal of Religion and Health, 54 (6), 2122-2133.
• Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N., (2009), “Conspicuous Consumption and Race,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124 (2), 425-467.
• Charness, G. & Rabin, M., (2002), “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817-869.
• Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J., (1996), “Satisfaction and Comparison Income,” Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381.
• Clark, A. E., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M., (2010), “Effort and Comparison Income: Experimental and Survey Evidence,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63 (3).
• Drechsel-Grau, M., & Schmid, K. D., (2014), “Consumption-Savings Decisions under Upward-Looking Comparisons: Evidence from Germany, 2002-2011,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106 (C), 254-268.
• Duesenberry, J. S., (1949), Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Duygan-Bump, B., (2005), “Aggregate Shocks, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Durable-Goods Purchases: Evidence from Turkey's 1994 Financial Crisis,” EUI Finance and Consumption Program Working Paper. Available:http://repec.org/sed2005/up.2033.1107166444.pdf [November 21, 2014]
• Easterlin, R., (1974), “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence,” in David, P. A., & Reder, M. W., eds., Nations and Households in Economic Growth, New York: Academic Press, 89-125.
• Easterlin, R., (1995), “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27 (1), 35-47.
• Falk, A., & Ichino, A., (2006), “Clean Evidence on Peer Effects,” Journal of Labor Economics, 24 (1), 39-57.
• Falk, A. & Knell, M, (2004), “Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous Goals and Reference Standards,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106 (3), 417-435, October.
• Fan, C. S. & Stark, O., (2011), “A Theory of Migration as a Response to Occupational Stigma,” International Economic Review, 52 (2), 549-571.
• Fehr, E. & Schmidt., K. M., (1999), “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-68.
• Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., (2005), “Income and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect,” Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997-1019.
• Filiztekin, A., (2015), “Income Inequality Trends in Turkey,” İktisat İsletme ve Finans, 30, (350), 63-92.
• Fitoussi, J., & Saraceno, F., (2010), “Inequality and Macroeconomic Performance,” Documents De Travail De Lofce, 13.
• Frank, R. H., Seth, A. & Levine-Dijk, O., (2014), “Expenditure Cascades,” Review of Behavioral Economics, 1, 55-73.
• Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A., (2002), “What Can Economists Learn From Happiness Research?” Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), 402-435.
• Friedman, M., (1957), A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Friehe, T. & Mechtel, M., (2014), “Conspicuous Consumption and Political Regimes: Evidence from East and West Germany,” European Economic Review, 67 (C), 62-81.
• Gokcekus, O. & Suzuki, Y., (2014), “Is There a Corruption Effect on Conspicuous Consumption?” Journal of Applied Economic Research. 8 (3), 215-235.
• Goldin, C. D. & Katz, L. F., (2007), “The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials, 1890 to 2005,” NBER Working Papers, 12984.
• Jappelli, T., & Modigliani, F., (1998), “The Age-Saving Profile and the Life-Cycle Hypothesis,” CSEF Working Papers 09, Center for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
• Kaus, W., (2012), “Conspicuous Consumption and ‘Race’: Evidence from South Africa,” Journal of Development Economics, 100, 63-73.
• Khamis, M. & Prakash, N. & Siddique, Z., (2012), “Consumption and Social Identity: Evidence from India,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83 (3), 353-371.
• Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J., (2007), “Community, Comparisons, and Subjective Well-Being in a Divided Society,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64 (1), 69-90.
• Knight, J., Song, L. & Gunatilaka, R., (2009), “Subjective Well-Being and Its Determinants in Rural China,” China Economic Review, 20 (4), 635-649.
• Kumhof, M., Rancière, R. & Winant, P., (2015), “Inequality, Leverage, and Crises,” American Economic Review, 105 (3), 1217-45
• Layard, R., Mayraz, G. & Nickell, S., (2009), “Does Relative Income Matter? Are The Critics Right?” CEP Discussion Paper, No. 918.
• Leibenstein, H., (1950), “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer's Demand,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 183-207.
• Luttmer, E. F., (2005), “Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (3), 963-1002.
• Manski, C. F., (1993), “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531-542.
• McBride, M., (2010), “Money, Happiness, and Aspirations: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74, 262-276. Milanovic, B., (2009), “Two Views On the Cause of the Global Crisis? Yale Global Online. Available: http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/twoviews-cause-global-crisis-part-i [Accessed 10 March 2017]
• Modigliani, F., & Brumberg, R., (1954), “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data,” in Kurihara, K. K., eds., Post-Keynesian Economics, Rutgers: University Press, 388-436.
• Mui, V., (1995), “The Economics of Envy,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 26, 311- 336.
• Özcan, K. M., Günay, A. & Ertaç, S., (2003), “Determinants of Private Saving Behavior in Turkey,” Applied Economics, 35 (12), 1405-1416.
• Persky, J., & Tam, M.-Y., (1990), “Local Status and National Social Welfare,” Journal of Regional Science, 2, 229-238.
• Quintana-Domeque, C., & Wohlfart, J., (2016), “Relative Concerns for Consumption at the Top: An Intertemporal Analysis for the UK,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 129 (C), 172-194.
• Rajan, R. G., (2010), Fault Lines—How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten The Global Economy, NJ: Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Ravenna, F. & Vincent, N., (2014), “Inequality and Debt in a Model with Heterogeneous Agents,” Economics Letters, 123 (2), 177-182.
• Redding, S. G., (1990), The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism, New York: Walter De Gruyter.
• Sahinli, M. A., (2013). “The Turkish Demand for Food,” Turkish Studies, 8 (8) 2111-2118.
• Sahinli, M. A. & Fidan, H., (2012). “Estimation of Food Demand In Turkey: Method of an Almost Ideal Demand System,” Quality & Quantity; 46 (2), 653-663.
• Sahinli, M. A. & Özçelik, A., (2009), “Estimating Elasticities with the Almost Ideal Demand System: Turkey Results,” The International J. of Economic and Social Research, 5 (2), 12-23.
• Sahinli, M. A. & Özçelik, A., (2015), “An Almost Ideal Demand System: An Application To The Different Commodities For Turkey,” Agriculture & Food, 3.
• Stiglitz, J., (2009), “Joseph Stiglitz and Why Inequality is at The Root of the Recession. In Next Left Website (Vol. 9). Available: http://www.nextleft.org/2009/01/joseph-stiglitz-and-why-inequalityis.html [Accessed 10 March 2017]
• Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V. & Lichtman, R. R., (1983), “It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluations as a Response to Victimization,” Journal of Social Issues, 39, 19-40.
• The World Bank, (2014), Turkey’s Transitions: Integration, Inclusion, Institutions. Report No. 90509-TR The World Bank. Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/507871468306558336/Main-report [Accessed 20 December 2016]
• Uzunöz, M., & Karakas, G., (2014), “Socio-Economic Determinants of Red-Meat Consumption in Urban Area of Tokat, Turkey, ”Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1), 37-52.
• Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, Reprinted in 1912. New York: The Macmillan Company.
• Wills, T. A., (1981), “Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271
• Woittiez, I. & Kapteyn, A., (1998), “Social Interactions and Habit Formation in a Model of Female Labor Supply,” Journal of Public Economics, 70, 185-205.
• Wang, N. Y. & Ahuvia, A. C., (1998), “Personal Taste and Family Face: Luxury Consumption in Confucian and Western Societies,” Psychology & Marketing, 15 (5).
• Wood, J. V. & Taylor, K. L., (1991), “Serving Self-Relevant Goals through Social Comparison,” in Suls, J., and Wills, T. A., eds., Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 23-49.