Öz
The evolution of economics as an academic discipline has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, marked by highly critical assessments of its education as well as its research aspects. The current state of these two aspects of economics has also drawn the interest of Turkish stakeholders, not only in the economics community but also in the broader realm of the social sciences. But now, perhaps for the first time, an internationally renowned academic in our field has written on the subject and directly focused on the Turkish case. Prof. Colander addresses himself to two specific and interrelated questions: What should Turkish economists do and how should they do it? He argues that the research Turkish economists carry out contributes far less than it should to the solution of Turkey’s economic problems. He offers two suggestions: i) To evaluate research, Turkish universities should develop a new journal-ranking method focusing on a particular research niche, and ii) a voucher
system should be introduced that would give Turkish demanders of Turkish economic research more direct control over what research is done.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Senses, F., (2004), “Difficulties and Trade-offs in Performance Evaluation in Social Sciences: A Turkish Perspective” in İlhan Tekeli and Necdet Teymur, eds., Evaluation of Performance in Social Sciences, Turkish National Commission for UNESCO, Ankara, 2004, pp. 83-105.
- Senses, F. (ed.), (2007), İktisat Öngörü Çalısması 2003-2023 (Economics Foresight Study, 2003-2023), Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları, Number 17, TÜBA, Ankara.
- Uygur, E. and O. Erdoğdu (eds.), (2005), İktisat Eğitimi (Economics Education), Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, Ankara.
Öz
The evolution of economics as an academic discipline has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, marked by highly critical assessments of its education as well as its research aspects. The current state of these two aspects of economics has also drawn the interest of Turkish stakeholders, not only in the economics community but also in the broader realm of the social sciences. But now, perhaps for the first time, an internationally renowned academic in our field has written on the subject and directly focused on the Turkish case. Prof. Colander addresses himself to two specific and interrelated questions: What should Turkish economists do and how should they do it? He argues that the research Turkish economists carry out contributes far less than it should to the solution of Turkey’s economic problems. He offers two suggestions: i) To evaluate research, Turkish universities should develop a new journal-ranking method focusing on a particular research niche, and ii) a voucher
system should be introduced that would give Turkish demanders of Turkish economic research more direct control over what research is done.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Senses, F., (2004), “Difficulties and Trade-offs in Performance Evaluation in Social Sciences: A Turkish Perspective” in İlhan Tekeli and Necdet Teymur, eds., Evaluation of Performance in Social Sciences, Turkish National Commission for UNESCO, Ankara, 2004, pp. 83-105.
- Senses, F. (ed.), (2007), İktisat Öngörü Çalısması 2003-2023 (Economics Foresight Study, 2003-2023), Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları, Number 17, TÜBA, Ankara.
- Uygur, E. and O. Erdoğdu (eds.), (2005), İktisat Eğitimi (Economics Education), Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu, Ankara.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Ekonomi |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Eylül 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3 |