The Relationship of Idea and Particulars in Plato: Episteme versus Doxa

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1-2, 37 - 46, 20.11.2017

Abdullah Demir

Öz

In this study, the epistemological approach of Plato is examined through his distinction between episteme and doxa. In this investigation, it is aimed to explain the theory of ideas, which is the concept that whenever a scholar studies on Plato, and their relations with the particulars. In our research, without ignoring the role and the place of the theory of ideas, we tried to understand the concept of doxa in his epistemology.In  Theaitetos, which is his one of thelater dialogues. Plato attempted to answer the question what the knowledge is without using the theory of ideas. By using these data, we could say that Plato shows us what the knowledge is not rather than what it is.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Plato, episteme, doxa, knowledge, ideas, particulars

Kaynakça

• Altuner, İlyas, “Ontological Bases of the Universe in Plato’s and Aristotle’s Cosmologies”, Iğdır University Journal of Social Sciences 3 (2013).
• Aristoteles, Metafizik, çev. Ahmet Arslan (İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar, 1996).
• Brun Jean, Platon ve Akademia, çev. İsmail Yerguz (Ankara, Dost Kitabevi, 2007).
• Cevizci, Ahmet, İdealar Kuramı: Platon’un Felsefesi Üzerine Araştırmalar (İstanbul: Gündoğan, Yayınları, 1999).
• Colter, Robert Steven, Plato’s Theory of Knowledge in the Theaetetus and Republic, PhD. Thesis (Illinois: Northwestern University, 2001).
• Cornford, Francis M., Plato and Parmenides (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969).
• Cross, Rupert C. and Woozley, Anthony D., Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary (London: Macmillan, 1964).
• Field, Guy Cromwell, The Philosophy of Plato (London: Oxford University Press, 1961).
• Guthrie, W. K. C., A History of Greek Philosophy: The Later Plato and the Academy, vol. III (London: Cambridge University Press, 1975).
• Hardie, W. F. R., A Study in Plato (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).
• Perelmuter, Zeev, Doxa versus Episteme: A Study in Aristotle’s Epistemology and Scientific Thought (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002).
• Plato, Cratylus, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. I (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Epinomis, trans. Alfred Edward Taylor (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1956).
• Plato, Laws, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. V (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Meno, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. II (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Phaedo, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. II (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Phaedrus, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. I (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, The Republic, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. III (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Sophist, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. IV (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Theaetetus, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. IV (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Plato, Timaeus, trans. Benjamin Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato, vol. III (London: Oxford University Press, 1892).
• Robinson, Richard, Plato’s Earlier Dialectic (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).
• Taylor, Alfred Edward, Plato: The Man and His Work (London: Butler and Tanner Ltd., 1966).
• Taylor, C. C. W., History of Philosophy from the Beginning to Plato (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).
• Turgut, İhsan, Platon’un Son Dönem Felsefesinde Bilgi Sorunu (Theaitetos’un Yeni Bir Yorumu) (İzmir: Bilgehan Matbaası, 1992).
• Zeller, Eduard, Grek Felsefesi Tarihi, çev. Ahmet Aydoğan (İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2008).