How to Define Definition: An Analysis on the Dispute about the Relation between the Definiens and the Definiendum in the Post-Avicennan Arabic Logic

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 5 - 19, 05.05.2019

Afife Şeyma Taç

Öz

As standing at the very heart of the conception (taṣawwur), definition is not only the ultimate purpose of conception but also paves the way for the assent (taṣdīq). Therefore, it would merely be surprising to find definition sections at right after the principles of conception, namely five universals, and before the first part of assent, viz. the proposition, in the books compiled through the tradition of post-Avicennan Arabic logic. Having begun with identifying what definition is, definition sections proceed with its conditions, types, and the things that violate an ideal definition. This paper focuses on the absolute definition itself by considering it as a definiendum and its definition as its definiens to analyze whether this definiens satisfies one particular condition set in definition theory, namely the condition that a definiens must not be applied to anything other than the definiendum. In terms of this specific rule, we encounter with two opposing views on the convenience of the terms implying “necessity” (istilzām) utilized when formulating the definiens of absolute definition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Post-Avicennan logic, conception, assent, definiendum, definiens, definition, necessity

Kaynakça

• Abharī. Īsāghūji. Ed. Talha Alp. Mantık: İsagoci Tercümesi & Mantık Terimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Yasin Yayınevi, 2013.
• Abharī. Kashf al-Ḥaqā’iq. Ed. Hüseyin Sarıoğlu. Keşfü'l-Hakâik fi Tahrîri'd-Dekâik. İstanbul: Çantay Kitabevi, 2001.
• Altaş, Eşref. Fahreddin er-Râzî’nin İbn Sînâ Yorumu ve Eleştirisi. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2009.
• Arıcı, Müstakim. Fahreddin Râzî Sonrası Metafizik Düşünce: Kâtibî Örneği. İstanbul: Klasik, 2015.
• Avicenna. Kitāb ash-Shifā': al-Burhān. Ed. Ömer Türker. Kitabü'ş Şifa: Burhan. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2006.
• Avicenna. Kitāb ash-Shifā': al-Madkhal. Ed. Ömer Türker. Kitabü'ş Şifa: Medhal. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2006.
• Avicenna. Remarks and Admonisions. Ed. Shams C. Inati. Wetteren: Universa Press, 1983.
• Avicenna. The Metaphysics of the Healing. Ed. Michael Marmura. Provo: Brigham Young University, 2005.
• Baga, Mehmet Sami. “El-İşârât’ın ‘“Garip”’ Bir Şerhinin Müellifi: Şemsüddin Semerkandî ve Beşârâtü’l -İşârât Adlı Eseri.” Bingöl Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3, no. 5 (2015): 221-46.
• Dawānī. Sharḥ al-Muḥaqqiq Dawānī wa 'Abdullāh al-Yazdī 'alā Tahdhīb al-Manṭiq li-Taftāzānī. Ed. Aḥmad al-Malibārī. Kuwait: Dār aḍ-Ḍiyā’, 2014.
• El-Rouayheb, Khaled. Islamic Intellectual History in the Seventeenth Century: Scholarly Currents in the Ottoman Empire and the Maghreb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• El-Rouayheb, Khaled. Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
• Ibrahim, Bilal. Freeing Philosophy from Metaphysics: Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Philosophical Approach to the Study of Natural Phenomena. PhD Thesis. Montreal: Mcgill University, 2013.
• Jurjānī. Ḥāshiya ‘alā Sharḥ as-Shamsiyya. Ed. Muḥsin Bīdarfar. Qum: Manshūrāt al-Bīdār, 2005.
• Kātibī. 'Ayn al-Qawā'id. Ragıp Paşa, no. 1481.
• Kātibī. Baḥr al-Fawā’id. Ragıp Paşa, no. 1481.
• Kātibī. Jāmi' ad-Daqā’iq. Hacı Beşir Ağa, no. 418.
• Kātibī. Risālat ash-Shamsiyya. Ed. C. Besbam Salih. Sharḥ ar-Risālat ash- Shamsiyya li-Taftāzānī. Amman: Dār an-Nūr al-Mubīn, 2016.
• Ibn Khaldūn. The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, Vol III. Ed. Franz Rosenthal. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
• Khūnajī. al-Jumal. Süleymaniye, Şehid Ali Paşa, no. 1805.
• Khūnajī. Kashf al-Asrār 'an Ghawāmīz al-Afkār. Ed. Khaled el-Rouayheb. Berlin & Tehran: Free University of Berlin, Institute for Islamic Studies & Iranian Institute for Philosophy, 2010.
• Lameer, Joep. Conception and Belief in Sadr al-Dīn Shirāzī. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy, 2006.
• Lameer, Joep. “Ghayr al-Ma'lūm Yamtani' al-Ḥukm 'alayh: An Exploratory Anthology of a False Paradox in Medieval Islamic Philosophy.” Oriens 42, no. 3-4 (2014): 397-453.
• Özturan, Mehmet. “An Introduction to the Critique of the Theory of Definition in Arabic Logic: Is Complete Definition Circular?” Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences 4, no. 3 (2018): 83-114.
• Özturan, Mehmet. Müteahhirîn Dönemi Mantığında Tasavvurat: Ali b. Ömer Kâtibî ve Kutbuddin Râzî Örneği. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversiesi, 2013.
• Samarqandī. Qisṭās al-Afkār fī Taḥqīq al-Asrār. İstanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2014.
• Taftāzānī. Sharḥ al-Maqāṣid, vol I. Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, 2011.
• Taftāzānī. Sharḥ ar-Risālat ash- Shamsiyya. Ed. C. Besbam Salih. ’Amman: Dār al-Nūr al-Mubīn, 2016.
• Taftāzānī. Tahdhīb al-Manṭiq. Ed. 'Abd al-Qāhir al-Qurdī. Cairo: Maṭba'at as-Sa'āda, 1912.
• Taḥtānī. Sharḥ al-Maṭāli'. Ed. 'Ali Asghar Jaghfarī Walanī. Tehran: Muassasat-i Intisharāt-i Dānishgāh-i Tehran, 1393H.
• Taḥtānī. Taḥrīr al-Qawā'id al-Manṭiqiyya fī Sharḥ ar-Risālāt ash-Shamsiyya. Ed. Ilyas Qabalān. Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, 2014.