İstanbul (Türkiye)’daki park ve süs bitkilerinde predatör akar (Acari : Phytoseiidae) türlerinin dağılımı

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 135 - 144, 15.03.2011

Ayşe Yeşilayer , Sultan Çobanoğlu

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the natural enemies of phytophagous mites on deciduous trees, conifers, and shrubs in recreational areas of Istanbul, Turkey between 2006 and 2008. A total of 1200 plant samples were collected from 51 plant species. As a result, 11 predatory mites (Acari : Phytoseiidae) namely Amblyseius andersoni (Chant, 1957), Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans, 1915), Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans, 1930), Neoseiulus insularis (Athias-Henriot, 1978), Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) tiliae Oudemans, 1929, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) athiasae Porath and Swirski, 1965, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) cotoneastri Wainstein, 1961, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bagdasarjani Wainstein and Arutunjan, 1967, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki Wainstein, 1958, Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904 and Paraseiulus triporus (Chant and Yoshida-Shaul, 1982) were identified. P. triporus and A. andersoni was found associated with Tydeus californicus (Acari: Tydeidae) on Carpinus betulus L. (Betulaceae). T. (T.) athiasae was the most abundant phytoseiid species.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

The distribution of predatory mite species (Acari : Phytoseiidae) on ornamental plants and parks of Istanbul, Turkey

Öz

2006-2008 yılları arasında İstanbul (Türkiye) parklarından toplanan ibreli, yaprağını döken park ve süs bitkileri üzerinden zararlı akar türlerinin doğal düşmanı olan predatör akar (Acari: Phytoseiidae) türleri belirlenmiştir. Toplam 51 farklı bitki türünden 1200 bitki örneği alınmıştır. Survey sonucunda 11 phytoseiid türü belirlenmiştir. Bu türler Amblyseius andersoni (Chant,1957), Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans, 1915), Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans, 1930), Neoseiulus insularis (Athias-Henriot, 1978), Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) tiliae Oudemans, 1929, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) athiasae Porath and Swirski, 1965, Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) cotoneastri Wainstein, 1961, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bagdasarjani Wainstein and Arutunjan, 1967, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki Wainstein, 1958, Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, 1904 ve Paraseiulus triporus (Chant and Yoshida-Shaul, 1982) (Acari: Phytoseiidae)’dur.
Çalışmada, bu türlerden T. (T.) athiasae en yaygın phytoseiid türü olarak bulunurken, A. andersoni, Tydeus californicus (Acari:Tydeidae) ile birlikte Gürgen [Carpinus betilus L. (Betulaceae)] üzerinde tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akar, Phytoseiidae, predatör, süs bitkileri, Istanbul, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Anonymous, 2007. İstanbul Haritası Resimleri (Web page: http://www.turkiye-resimleri.com/r-istanbul-38-istanbul- haritasi-3803.htm), (Erişim tarihi: Haziran 2007)
• Aksoy, Y., 2001. İstanbul Kenti Yesil Alan Durumunun İrdelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, İ.T.Ü Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 233 s.
• Arutunjan, E. S., 1977. Key to phytoseiid mites of agricultural crops in the Armenian USSR. Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences, Armenian SSR, Erevan, 112 pp.
• Bayram, Ş. & S. Çobanoğlu, 2007. Mite fauna (Acari: Prostigmata, Mesostigmata, Astigmata) of coniferous plants in Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 31 (4): 279–290.
• Beglyarov, G. A., 1981. Keys to the determination of phytoseiid mites of the U.S.S.R. Information, Bulletin, Internal Organization for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, East Palaearctic Section, 2 (1): 97 pp.
• Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul, 1987. A world review of the soleiger species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal Zoology, 65: 1770–1804.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1989a. Phytoseiid mite species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) determined in citrus orchards in some regions of Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 13: 163–178.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1989b. Antalya ili Sebze Alanlarında Tespit Edilen Phytoseiidae Berlese 1915 (Acarina: Mesostigmata) Türleri. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 29 (1–2): 47–64.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1991. The distribution of phytoseiid species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in important growing areas of Turkey. (Eds. In: Dusbabek, F. and V. Bukva). Modern Acarology (1). Academia, Prague and SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, 565–570 pp.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1992. An annotated list of mites found on the hazel of Turkey. Israel Journal of Entomology 25: 35–40.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1993. Türkiye’nin Önemli elma bölgelerinde bulunan Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformis) türleri üzerinde sistematik çalısmalar IV. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 17 (4): 239–255.
• Çobanoğlu, S., 1997. New phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Mesostigmata) for Turkish fauna. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 21: 361–370.
• Çobanoğlu, S. 2004. Phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) of Thrace, Turkey. Israel Journal of Entomology 34: 83–107.
• Çobanoğlu, S., C. Uysal & M. E. Ökten, 2003. The complex of the beneficial mite fauna of ornamental trees and shrubs in Ankara, Turkey. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine, 139: 7–12.
• Düzgüneş, Z. & S. Kılıç, 1983. Türkiye’nin önemli elma bölgelerinde bulunan Phytoseiidae (Acarina) türlerinin tespiti, bunlardan Tetranychus viennensis Zacher (Acarina: Tetranychidae) ile iliskileri bakımından en önemli türün etkinliği üzerinde arastırmalar. Doğa Bilim Dergisi, 8: 193–205.
• İncekulak, R. & O. Ecevit, 2002. A study on determination of harmful and beneficial mite species in apple orchards in Amasya and their population densities. Proceedings of the Fifth Turkish National Congress of Biological Control, Erzurum: 297–314 pp.
• Kabicek, J., & Z. Koubkova, 1998. Phytoseiid mites on plants of a city park. Plant Protection Science, 34: 142– 45.
• Kasap, İ., R. Atlıhan, M. S. Özgökçe, M. B. Kaydan, E. Polat & A. Yarımbatman, 2007. Harmful and useful mite species determined in the walnut orchards around Van Lake. In: Proceedings of the Second Plant Protection Congress of Turkey, Isparta. 256 pp.
• Kasap, İ. & S. Çobanoğlu, 2007. Mite (Acari) fauna in apple orchards of around the Van Lake basin of Turkey. . Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 31: 97–109.
• Kasap, İ. & S. Çobanoğlu, 2009. Phytoseiid mites Hakkari province, with Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) tamaricis Kolodochka, 1982 (Acari: Phytoseiidae), new record for the predatory mite fauna of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 33: 301–308.
• Kolodochka, L. A., 1978. Handbook on identifying plants. Dwelling phytoseiid mites. Akamiya Nauk SSR, Institute Zoology, Kiev, 4–79.
• Kreiter, S., 1991. Les caractéristiques biologiques des acariens prédateurs d’acariens et leur utilasation en lutte biologique. Programme Agriculture Viticole, 108 (11): 247–262.
• Kumral, N. A. & B. Kovancı, 2004. Bursa ili Zeytin ağaçlarında bulunan akar türleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2): 25–34.
• Kumral, N. A. 2005, Bursa Ilinde Ilıman Iklim Meyvelerinde Bulunan Zararlı ve Doğal Düşman Akarların Saptanması ve Panonychus ulmi (Koch)’nin Bazı Pestisitlere Karşı Duyarlılığı Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bitki Koruma Ana Bilim Dalı, (Basılmamış) Doktora Tezi, 157 s.
• Madanlar, N., 1992. İzmir ve çevresinde turunçgil bahçelerindeki akar türlerinin. Türkiye II.Entomoloji Kongresi (28– 31 Ocak), Entomoloji Derneği Yayınları, 15: 683–691.
• McMurtry, J. A., 1977. Some predaceous mites (Phytoseiidae) on citrus in the Mediterranean region. Entomophaga, 22 (1): 19–30.
• Moraes, G. J., J. A. McMurtry, H. A. Denmark & C. A. Campos, 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434: 1–494.
• Rahmani, H., K. Kamali, & F. Faraji, 2010. Predatory mite fauna of Phytoseiidae of northwest Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 34: 497-508.
• Rowell, H. J., D. A. Chant, & R. I. C. Hansell, 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Canadian Entomologist, 110: 859–876.
• Ripka, G., 1997. Aphid and mite fauna of ornamental trees and shrubs. PhD dissertation, Budapest, IV + 209 pp.
• Ripka, G., 1998. New data added to the body of knowledge on the Tetranychid and Tenuipalpid fauna in Hungary (Acari: Prostigmata). Acta Phytopathology Entomology Hungary, 33 (3–4): 425– 433.
• Şekeroğlu, E., 1984. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Mesostigmata) of Southern Anatolia, their biology and effectiveness as a biological agents on strawberry plants. Doğa Bilim Dergisi, D2, 8: 320–336.
• Swirski, E. & S. Amitai, 1982. Notes on predacious mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Turkey, with description of the male of Phytoseius echinus Wainstein and Arutunjan. Israel Journal of Entomology,16: 55–62.
• Tuovinen, T., 1994. Influence of surrounding trees and bushes on the phytoseiid mite fauna on apple orchard trees in Finland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 50, 39-47.
• Tuovinen, T. & J.A.H. Rokx, 1991. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on apple trees and in surrounding vegetation in southern Finland. Densities and species composition. Experimental and Applied Acarology, Vol. 12: 35-46.
• Yanar, D. & O. Ecevit, 2005. Tokat ilinde elma (Malus communis L.) bahçelerinde görülen bitki zararlisi ve predatör akar türleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1): 18–23.
• Yıldız, S., 1998. Determination of the Phytoseiidae Species from Vegetable Growing Areas of The East Mediterranean-Turkey. MSc Thesis, Çukurova University Adana, 36 pp.