Yüzücülerde, koşucularda ve hentbol oyuncularında egzersiz sonrası nazal yanıt

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different physical activities on nasal response.
Methods: Young non-professional university teams (male, 20 to 24 years old) were enrolled in this study. Nasal functions were measured with an active anterior rhinomanometry and the saccharine transport method (nasal transport times, NTT) before and immediately after the exercise. After the initial measurements, the first group swam 30 minutes in the  swimming pool. The second group (outdoor runners) ran 10 kilometers in approximately 30 minutes. The third group played handball for 30 minutes. The initial findings were compared statistically with the data obtained after exercise.
Results: When the reductions in nasal resistance were compared before and after exercise, the inspiration and expiration values of all groups were statistically significant. These three groups were similar regarding the comparison of nasal resistance change percentages. When the NTTs were compared before and after exercise, the decreases in the
amount of time were statistically significant in all these three groups after exercise. When the change percentages of the decrease in nasal transport time were compared, the decrease in handball players was statistically significant compared to runners.
Conclusion: Nasal resistance reductions and the decreases in NTT were not affected by the type of sports being played or the air quality of the environment.

Keywords

• Nazal direnç,aktif anterior rinomanometre,yüzme,koşma,nazal transport zamanları,Nasal resistance,active anterior rhinomanometry,nasal transport times,running,swimming,handball

Kaynakça

1. 1. Fonseca MT, Voegels RL, Pinto KM. Evaluation of nasal volume by acoustic rhinometry before and after physical exercise. Am J Rhinol 2006;20:269–73.
2. 2. McCafferty WB. Air pollution and athletic performance. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1981.
3. 3. Carlisle AJ, Sharp NC. Exercise and outdoor ambient air pollution. Br J Sports Med 2001;35:214–22.
4. 4. Daigle CC, Chalupa DC, Gibb FR, et al. Ultrafine particle deposition in humans during rest and exercise. Inhal Toxicol 2003; 15:539–52.
5. 5. Cutrufello PT, Smoliga JM, Rundell KW. Small things make a big difference: particulate matter and exercise. Sports Med 2012; 42:1041–58.
6. 6. Randolph CC. Allergic rhinitis and asthma in the athlete. Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27:104–9.
7. 7. Rundell KW. High levels of airborne ultrafine and fine particulate matter in indoor ice arenas. Inhal Toxicol 2003;15:237–50.
8. 8. Bougault V, Boulet LP. Airway dysfunction in swimmers. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:402–6.

9. 9. Andersen I, Camner P, Jensen PL, Philipson K, Proctor DF. Nasal clearance in monozygotic twins. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 110:301–5.
10. 10. Yoshizaki K, Brito JM, Toledo AC, et al. Subchronic effects of nasally instilled diesel exhaust particulates on the nasal and airway epithelia in mice. Inhal Toxicol 2010;22:610–7.
11. 11. Passàli D, Damiani V, Passàli GC, Passàli FM, Bellussi L. Alterations in rhinosinusal homeostasis in a sportive population: our experience with 106 athletes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:502–6.
12. 12. Fonseca MT, Machado JA, Pereira SA, Pinto KM, Voegels RL. Effects of physical exercise in nasal volume. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2006;72:256–60.
13. 13. Ottaviano G, Staffieri A, Stritoni P, et al. Nasal dysfunction induced by chlorinate water in competitive swimmers. Rhinology 2012;50: 294–8.
14. 14. Müns G, Singer P, Wolf F, Rubinstein I. Impaired nasal mucociliary clearance in long-distance runners. Int J Sports Med 1995;16:209–13.
15. 15. Olséni L, Wollmer P. Mucociliary clearance in healthy men at rest and during exercise. Clin Physiol 1990;10:381–7.
16. 16. Wolff RK, Dolovich MB, Obminski G, Newhouse MT. Effects of exercise and eucapnic hyperventilation on bronchial clearance in man. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1977;43:46–50.