Araştırma Makalesi

Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 31 Aralık 2016
  • Çiğdem Kalaycık Ertugay
  • Ayça Özbal Koç
  • Halime Çevik
  • Selim Sermed Erbek
PDF İndir
EN

Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the frequency of incidental diagnosis of paranasal sinus and mastoid abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its correlation with symptoms of patients.
Methods: We examined 100 patients who underwent brain MRI due to several different complaints other than sinusitis and mastoiditis. The patients who had any nasal or otologic pathology in otolaryngology examination were excluded from the study. Afterwards, a total of 65 patients were included into the study. The questionnaire consisted of otological symptoms and Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), Lund and Mackay scoring system for rhinosinusitis were filled by all patients immediately prior to imaging. The analysis of the MRI scan in terms of rhinosinusitis according to the Lund-Mackay radiological scoring and mastoiditis was performed by the same radiologist.
Results: The mean age of 65 patients was 46.62±17.73 years. Eighteen (27.7%) of these were men and 47 (72.3%) were women. In 26 (40%) of 65 patients, MRI demonstrated mastoiditis. We could not find any statistically significant correlation between mastoiditis and upper respiratory tract infection (p=0.896). There was no statistically significant relationship between radiological scores and total sinus symptom scores (p=0.93). Additionally, we could not find any correlation between radiological scores and SNOT-20 (p=0.923).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that although some of these patients had various symptoms of sinus or mastoid diseases, these symptoms had no statistically significant correlation with the radiological diagnosis. In conclusion, radiologists should advise clinical correlation of their radiologic findings rather than reporting a clinical diagnosis such as sinusitis and mastoiditis.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Illes J, Kirschen MP, Edwards E, et al.; Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research. Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 2006;311:783–4.
  2. 2. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:219–48.
  3. 3. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 1821–8.
  4. 4. Yue NC, Longstreth WT Jr, Elster AD, Junqreis CA, O’Leary DH, Poirier VC. Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology 1997;202:41–6.
  5. 5. Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 1999;282:36–9.
  6. 6. Hartwigsen G, Siebner HR, Deuschl G, Jansen O, Ulmer S. Incidental findings are frequent in young healthy individuals undergoing magnetic resonance imaging in brain research imaging studies: a prospective single-center study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:596–600.
  7. 7. Kim BS, Illes J, Kaplan RT, Reiss A, Atlas SW. Incidental findings on pediatric MR images of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1674–7.
  8. 8. Reneman L, de Win MM, Booij J, van den Brink W, den Heeten GJ, Freling N, Majoie CB. Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1971–4.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Çiğdem Kalaycık Ertugay Bu kişi benim

Ayça Özbal Koç Bu kişi benim

Halime Çevik Bu kişi benim

Selim Sermed Erbek Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Temmuz 2017

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kalaycık Ertugay, Ç., Özbal Koç, A., Çevik, H., & Erbek, S. S. (2016). Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir? ENT Updates, 6(3), 135-139. https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC
AMA
1.Kalaycık Ertugay Ç, Özbal Koç A, Çevik H, Erbek SS. Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir? ENT Updates. 2016;6(3):135-139. https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC
Chicago
Kalaycık Ertugay, Çiğdem, Ayça Özbal Koç, Halime Çevik, ve Selim Sermed Erbek. 2016. “Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?”. ENT Updates 6 (3): 135-39. https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC.
EndNote
Kalaycık Ertugay Ç, Özbal Koç A, Çevik H, Erbek SS (01 Aralık 2016) Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir? ENT Updates 6 3 135–139.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Kalaycık Ertugay, A. Özbal Koç, H. Çevik, ve S. S. Erbek, “Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?”, ENT Updates, c. 6, sy 3, ss. 135–139, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC
ISNAD
Kalaycık Ertugay, Çiğdem - Özbal Koç, Ayça - Çevik, Halime - Erbek, Selim Sermed. “Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?”. ENT Updates 6/3 (01 Aralık 2016): 135-139. https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC.
JAMA
1.Kalaycık Ertugay Ç, Özbal Koç A, Çevik H, Erbek SS. Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir? ENT Updates. 2016;6:135–139.
MLA
Kalaycık Ertugay, Çiğdem, vd. “Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir?”. ENT Updates, c. 6, sy 3, Aralık 2016, ss. 135-9, https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC.
Vancouver
1.Çiğdem Kalaycık Ertugay, Ayça Özbal Koç, Halime Çevik, Selim Sermed Erbek. Beyin MR’ında saptanan insidental bulgular otolarengoloji pratiğinde klinik olarak ne kadar önemlidir? ENT Updates [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;6(3):135-9. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA64NH45CC