Evaluation of the articulatory characteristics of voice in cochlear implanted children

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of cochlear implantation on articulation by using voice- onset time (VOT).

Methods: At the first phase of this study, a total of 25 children without hearing loss were examined. VOT values of Turkish plosive consonants of /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, /g/ specific to this age group were estimated, and their standardization was achieved. To this end, Kay Elemetrics CSL 4400 software (Key Elemetrics Ltd, Lincoln Park, NJ, USA) was used. Referencing these VOT values, 40 children ages ranging between 4 and 11 years who underwent cochlear implantation in our clinic were divided into six groups based on the duration of cochlear implantation, and VOT values were determined in these groups. These groups were compared within themselves, and with healthy children.

Results: VOT values of consonants increased as the duration of cochlear implantation increased and approached to those of the children with normal hearing, and at the end of four years of cochlear implant use, they caught up with those of the normal hearing group.

Conclusion: Our results have shown that early stage implantation, and use of implant for an adequate time period have a favorable impact on articulation in other words on comprehensibility of speech. We thought that VOT can be use in the evaluation of the effect of cochlear implant on the development of speech.

Keywords

• Articulation,cochlear implantation

Kaynakça

1. Lane H, Perkell JS. Control of voice-onset time in the absence of hearing: a review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:1334– 43. 2. McCrea CR, Morris RJ. Effects of vocal training and phonatory task on voice onset time. J Voice 2007;21:54–63. 3. Robb M, Gilbert H, Lerman J. Influence of gender and environ- mental setting on voice onset time. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2005;57:125–33. 4. Ogut F, Kilic MA, Engin EZ, Midilli R. Voice onset time for Turkish stop consonants. Speech Commun 2006;48:1094–9. 5. McCrea CR, Morris RJ. The effects of fundamental frequency level on voice onset time in normal adult male speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:1013–24. 6. Lisker L, Abramson AS. A cross-language study of voicing in ini- tial stops: acoustic measurements. Word 1964;20:384–422. 7. Dalgic A, Kandogan T, Aksoy G. Voice onset time for Turkish stop consonants in adult cochlear implanted patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;67:308–13. 8. Kant AR, Patadia R, Govale P, Rangasayee R, Kirtane M. Acoustic analysis of speech of cochlear implantees and its implications. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2012 Apr;5 Suppl 1:S14–8. 9. Grandon B, Vilain A, Loevenbruck H, Schmerber S, Truy E. Realisation of voicing by French-speaking CI children after long- term implant use: an acoustic study. Clin Linguist Phon 2017;31:598-611. 10. Maddieson I. Phonetic Universals. In: The handbook of phonetic sciences. Laver J, Hardcastle WJ, editors. Oxford: Blackwell; 1997. p. 619–39. 11. Halle M, Stevens KN. On the mechanism of glottal vibration for vowels and consonants. MIT Quarterly Progress Report 1967;85:267–71. 12. Fischer-Jorgensen E. Acouistic analysis of stop consonants. Miscallanea Phonetica 1954;42–59. . Lindblom B. Vowel duration and a model of lip mandible coordina- tion. Speech Transmission Laboratory, Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology; 1967. p. 1–29. 14. Lisker L. On “explaining” vowel duration variation. Glossa 1974;8: 233–46. 15. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1978. p. 187–92. 16. Docherty G. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. New York, NY: Foris; 1992. p. 18–27. 17. Jessen M. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1998; p. 113–7. 18. Kant AR, Patadia R, Govale P, Rangasayee R, Kirtane M. Acoustic analysis of speech of cochlear implantees and its implications. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2012;5 Suppl 1:S14–8.