İleri evre larenks kanserinde bilgisayarlı tomografideki potansiyel tuzaklar

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 5 - 11, 30.04.2016

Hale Aslan Ercan Pınar Sedat Öztürkcan İbrahim Aladağ Nezahat Karaca Erdoğan Demet Etit Bilge Demirkol Tuna Abdülkadir İmre Yüksel Olgun Düzgün Ateş

Öz

Objective: In laryngeal cancer the most suspected regions of invasion are preepiglottic space (PES), anterior commissure (AC), thyroid cartilage (TC), subglottic region (SR) and extralaryngeal spread (ELS). The objective of this study is to compare the results of preoperative computed tomography (CT) with postoperative histopathologic analysis in these critical regions for the total or partial laryngectomy.

Methods: Eighty-nine patients, who had undergone total laryngectomy with a diagnosis of laryngeal cancer reported that squamous cell cancer (SCC) between 2005 and 2013, were reviewed retrospectively. All the patients, after the first application done total laryngectomy before flexible laryngoscopy, computed tomography for the neck and endoscopic biopsy with direct laryngoscopy. Histopathological results of PES, AC, TC, ELS and SR invasion are compared to preoperative CT findings and determined of specificity, sensitivity, false negative and false positive results and rate of accuracy.

Results: All the patients were male, median age was 67 (range: 48 to 81) years. Fifty-six patients were in T4 and 33 patients in T3 stage. Compared to results between positive CT findings and negative histopathological examination; PES invasion in 41 patients/ 5 patients, AC invasion was found in 38/ 15 patients, TC invasion in 28/16 patients, SR invasion in 49/ 9 patients and ELS invasion in 25 /7 patients. Accuracy rate of computed tomography in these regions are 85%, 64%, 76%, 79%, and 83%, respectively. All the results especially thyroid cartilage invasion were statistically significant.

Conclusion: In all regions invasion, CT has a low diagnostic reliability in high-grade laryngeal cancer in our study. We suggested that histopathological results are the gold standard intraoperatively for determining total or partial laryngectomy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Computed tomography, larynx carcinoma, accuracy

Kaynakça

• 1. Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, Villaret DB. Management of T1-T2 glottic carcinomas. Cancer 2004;100:1786–92.
• 2. Pameijer FA, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Kubilis PS. Can pretreatment computed tomography predict local control in T3 squamous cell carsinoma of the glottic larynx treated with definitive radiotheraphy? Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37:1011–21.
• 3. Rassekh CH, Haughey BC. Total laryngectomy and laryngopharengectomy. In: Cummings CW, editor. Cummings otolaryngology and head and neck surgery. 4th ed. Philadephia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 2381–400.
• 4. Dubin J, Rieux D, Caron C, Desnos J. Use of tomodansitometry in the evaluation of the extension of certain laryngeal cancers. [Article in French] Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1983;100:125–8.
• 5. Williams DW 3rd. Imaging of laryngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997;30:35–58.
• 6. Giron J, Joffre P, Serres-Cousine O, Senac JP. CT and MR evaluation of laryngeal carcinomas. J Otolaryngol 1993;22:284–93.
• 7. Kim JW, Yoon SY, Park IS, Park SW, Kim YM. Correlation between radiological images and pathological results in supraglottic cancer. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:1224–9.
• 8. Nix PA, Salvage D. Neoplastic invasion of laryngeal cartilage:the significance of cartilage sclerosis on computed tomography images. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:372–5.
• 9. Lefebvre JL, Ang KK; Larynx Preservation Consensus Panel. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: key issues and recommendations-- a consensus panel summary. Head Neck 2009;31:429–41.
• 10. Becker M, Zbaren P, Laeng H, Stoupis C, Porcellini B, Vock P. Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging, and CT with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;194:661–9.
• 11. Keem JA, Wainwright J. Ossification of the thyroid, cricoid, and arytenoid cartilages. S Afr J Lab Clin Med 1958;4:83–108.
• 12. Cusumano RJ, Kaufman D, Weiss M, Gallo L, Reede D, Myssiorek D. Needle aspiration biopsy of the pre-epiglottic space. Head Neck 1989;11:41–5.
• 13. Loevner LA, Yousem DM, Montone KT, Weber R, Chalian AA, Weinstein GS. Can radiologists accurately predict preepiglottic space invasion with MR imaging? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1681–7.
• 14. Zbären P, Becker M, Läng H. Pretherapeutic staging of laryngeal carcinoma. Clinical findings, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging compared with histopathology. Cancer 1996;77:1263–72.
• 15. Blitz AM, Aygun N. Radiologic evaluation of larynx cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008;41:697–713.
• 16. de Souza RP, de Barros N, Paes Junior AJ, Tornin Ode S, Rapoport A, Cerri GG. Value of computed tomography for evaluating the subglottis in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous carcinoma. Sao Paulo Med J 2007;125:73–6.
• 17. Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell H, et al. Laryngeal cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope 2006;116(9 Pt 2 Suppl 111):1-13.
• 18. Curtin H. Anatomy, imaging and pathology of the larynx. In: Som P, Curtin H, editors. Head and neck imaging. 5th ed. St Lois, MO: Elsevier; 2011 p. 1905–2039.
• 19. Chen SA, Muller S, Chen AY, et al. Patterns of extralaryngeal spread of laryngeal cancer: thyroid cartilage penetration occurs in a minority of patients with extralaryngeal spread of laryngeal squamous cell cancers. Cancer 2011;117:5047–51.