Nimodipin ve prednizolonun travmatik fasiyal sinir hasarı üzerine etkisi
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the histopathological effect of nimodipine and prednisolone treatment on an animal model with peripheral facial nerve paralysis generated by clamping.
Methods: Twenty-eight New Zealand originated rabbits with facial nerve paralysis of the buccal branches generated by clamping were divided into four groups of seven each, administered with nimodipine, methylprednisolone and nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination throughout 21 days. The injured neural tissues were investigated histopathologically after treatment regarding perineural fibrosis, collagen degeneration, axonal degeneration, myelin degeneration, Schwann cell proliferation, normal myelin structure, and edema. The groups were compared with each other and with the control group.
Results: Statistically significant difference was determined between nimodipine and control groups regarding increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration and myelin structure; between nimodipine and methylprednisolone groups, and between nimodipine and nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination groups regarding edema (p<0.05). Statistically significant data were also found between methylprednisolone and control groups in terms of increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration and edema; between nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination and the control groups in terms of increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration, normal myelin structure and edema (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Nimodipine and methylprednisolone both have positive effects on traumatic peripheral nerve paralysis with nerve integrity preserved whereas advantage of nimodipine over methylprednisolone cannot be suggested.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Proctor B, Nager GT. The facial canal: normal anatomy, variations and anomalies. I. Normal anatomy of the facial canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982;97:33–44.
- 2. Davis RE, Telischi FF. Traumatic facial nerve injuries: review of diagnosis and treatment. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1995;1:30–41.
- 3. Frostick SP, Yin Q, Kemp GJ. Schwann cells, neurotrophic factors, and peripheral nerve regeneration. Microsurgery 1998;18:397–405.
- 4. Makwana M, Raivich G. Molecular mechanisms in successful peripheral regeneration. FEBS J 2005;272:2628–38.
- 5. Gordon T, Sulaiman O, Boyd GJ. Experimental strategies to promote functional recovery after peripheral nerve injuries. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2003;8:236–50.
- 6. Mendonça AC, Barbieri HC, Mazzer N. Directly applied low intensity direct electric current enhances peripheral nerve regeneration in rat. J Neurosci Methods 2003;129:183–90.
- 7. Gispen WH, Schuurman T, Traber J. Nimodipine and neural plasticity in the peripheral nervous system of adult and aged rats. In: Morad M, Nayler W, Kazda S, Schramm M, editors. The Ca2+ channel: structure, function and implications. Berlin: Springer; 1988. p. 491–502.
- 8. Borgens RB. Voltage gradients and ionic currents in injured and regenerating axons. Adv Neurol 1988;47:51–66.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Tolga Dölen
Bu kişi benim
İrfan Kaygusuz
Bu kişi benim
Nusret Akpolat
Bu kişi benim
Hayrettin Cengiz Alpay
Bu kişi benim
Erol Keleş
Bu kişi benim
Turgut Karlıdağ
Bu kişi benim
Şinasi Yalçın
Bu kişi benim
Koray Yüksel
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Nisan 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
24 Temmuz 2017
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1