Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 19 Mayıs 2016
  • İsmail Aydogan
EN

Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage

Öz

In almost all systems there have been unethical behaviors that take place in written and visual media. Of all these unethical behaviors, favoritism takes precedence. This study was conducted to investigate whether or not the administrators favor some people in the Turkish national education system and also to reveal the teachers’ thoughts on whether or not the administrators (central, provincial, and school administrators) show favoritism in their decisions and practices. In the study, a scale was constructed to collect data, and its validity and reliability were checked. After a group of teachers tested the scale, the results indicated that the teachers tend to believe that central, provincial and school administrators are partial in favor of some people in the Turkish national education system. Teachers believe that favoritism has existed in the following areas: the appointment of central administrators in the ministry of national education, in school administrators and teachers, in providing educational materials for schools, in selecting schools to take part in activities, in promoting teachers to a higher position or appointing them to positions abroad; about tendering investments in the provincial education administration, in opening private schools, courses and institutions, in the distribution of funds to schools, as well as the use of buildings, establishments and materials provided by the ministry; in the practice of school administrators about the tolerance for teachers’ having permission for any reasons, in teachers beginning courses and leaving classrooms on time, and finally in selecting participants for activities from which they can benefit financially and academically. Participants believe that administrators neglect skills and abilities, and that they behave show favoritism about the issues mentioned above in favor of their friends, fellow countrymen, and those having political views that align with their own

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A.S., & Raggad, B.G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554- 570.
  2. Akkoyunlu, E. (1998). Çevre etiği (Environmental ethics). Ankara: TODAI Press.
  3. Aktan, C. (n.d). Hastalığın adı: kronizm (eş-dost kayırmacılık) [Illness:cronyism (favoring friends and acquaintances)]. Retrieved April 12, 2006, From http://www.canaktan.org/din-ahlak/ahlak/ siyasal-hastaliklar/kronizm.htm
  4. Aristotle. (1983). Politika [Politics]. (M.Tunçay, Trans.), Istanbul, Remzi Press.(Original work published 1979).
  5. Baydar, T. (2005). Yönetim etiğine genel bir bakış [Introduction to administrative ethics]. Turk Administration Journal, 449, 47-74.
  6. Bayhan, V.(2002). Demokrasi ve sivil toplum örgütlerinin engelleri; patronaj ve nepotizm [Handicaps for democracy and non-governmental organizations; patronage and nepotism]. Sivas Republic University Social Sciences Journal, 26(1), 1-13.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1996). Türk yükseköğretiminde araştırma eğitimi [Research study in Turkish higher education]. Unpublished Ph.D.Dissertation. Ankara University.
  8. Dönmez, R. (2003). Tecil kurumunun hukuki niteliği, unsurları ve kamu alacaklarinin tecilinde idarenin takdir yetkisi [Legal attribute of deferment institution, components and discretionary authority in postponement of public demanders]. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://home.anadolu.edu.tr/~rdonmez/tecil.htm.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

İsmail Aydogan Bu kişi benim
Erciyes University, Turkey

Yayımlanma Tarihi

19 Mayıs 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Mayıs 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2009 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aydogan, İ. (2016). Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, 4(1), 19-35. https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU
AMA
1.Aydogan İ. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;4(1):19-35. https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU
Chicago
Aydogan, İsmail. 2016. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4 (1): 19-35. https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU.
EndNote
Aydogan İ (01 Mayıs 2016) Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4 1 19–35.
IEEE
[1]İ. Aydogan, “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”, Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 19–35, May. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU
ISNAD
Aydogan, İsmail. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4/1 (01 Mayıs 2016): 19-35. https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU.
JAMA
1.Aydogan İ. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;4:19–35.
MLA
Aydogan, İsmail. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, c. 4, sy 1, Mayıs 2016, ss. 19-35, https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU.
Vancouver
1.İsmail Aydogan. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research [Internet]. 01 Mayıs 2016;4(1):19-35. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35RJ86LU