Why Educational Standards Are Not Truly Objective

Öz

Educational standards have become a popular choice for setting clear educational targets for students. The language of standards is that they are “objective” as opposed to typical tests which may suffer from bias. This article seeks to further analyze the claims that standards are objective and fair to all. The author focuses on six issues which illustrate the problematic nature of educational standards. Examples from the Common Core standards are chosen to show the range of problems associated with standards-based systems. Given these arguments, it is questionable as to whether educational standards represent a better alternative to norm-referenced tests

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Educational measurement, educational standards

Kaynakça

1. Docherty, S., Davis, O., Kovas, Y., Meaburn, E., Dale, P., Petrill, S., Schalkwyk, S. & Plomin, R. (2010). A genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with mathematics ability and disability. Genes, Brain and Behavior 9(2): 234–247.
2. Furnham, A., Monsen, J., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement, Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79(4): 769-82.
3. Harlen, W. & Crick, R.D. (2003). Testing and Motivation for Learning. Assessment in Education, 10(2): 169-207.
4. Muller, C. (2008). The Minimum Competency Exam Requirement, Teachers' and Students' Expectations and Academic Performance. Social Psychology of Education, 2(2): 199-216
5. Oxford dictionaries online. (2014). http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/
6. Plomin, R. (1999). Genetics and general cognitive ability. Nature, 402(6761 Suppl): C25-9.
7. Post, T., Harwell, M., Davis, J., Maeda, Y., Cutler, A., Andersen, E., Kahn, J., & Norman, K. (2008). "Standards"-Based Mathematics Curricula and Middle-Grades Students' Performance on Standardized Achievement Tests. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2): 184-212.
8. Shakeshaft, N., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Rimfeld,K., Krapohl, E.,. Haworth, C., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2013). Strong Genetic Influence on a UK Nationwide Test of Educational Achievement at the End of Compulsory Education at Age 16. PLoS ONE, 8 (12): e80341 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080341.

9. Shavelson, R., Baxter, G., &Gao, X. (1993). Sampling Variability of Performance Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3): 215-232. Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D.,
10. Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M.,& Makuch R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine 326(3): 145-50.
11. Wilson, G., & Hoke, K. (1921). How to Measure. New York: The Macmillan Company.