BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 2009, 19 - 35, 19.05.2016

Öz

In almost all systems there have been unethical behaviors that take place in written and visual media. Of all these unethical behaviors, favoritism takes precedence. This study was conducted to investigate whether or not the administrators favor some people in the Turkish national education system and also to reveal the teachers’ thoughts on whether or not the administrators (central, provincial, and school administrators) show favoritism in their decisions and practices. In the study, a scale was constructed to collect data, and its validity and reliability were checked. After a group of teachers tested the scale, the results indicated that the teachers tend to believe that central, provincial and school administrators are partial in favor of some people in the Turkish national education system. Teachers believe that favoritism has existed in the following areas: the appointment of central administrators in the ministry of national education, in school administrators and teachers, in providing educational materials for schools, in selecting schools to take part in activities, in promoting teachers to a higher position or appointing them to positions abroad; about tendering investments in the provincial education administration, in opening private schools, courses and institutions, in the distribution of funds to schools, as well as the use of buildings, establishments and materials provided by the ministry; in the practice of school administrators about the tolerance for teachers’ having permission for any reasons, in teachers beginning courses and leaving classrooms on time, and finally in selecting participants for activities from which they can benefit financially and academically. Participants believe that administrators neglect skills and abilities, and that they behave show favoritism about the issues mentioned above in favor of their friends, fellow countrymen, and those having political views that align with their own

Kaynakça

  • Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A.S., & Raggad, B.G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554- 570.
  • Akkoyunlu, E. (1998). Çevre etiği (Environmental ethics). Ankara: TODAI Press.
  • Aktan, C. (n.d). Hastalığın adı: kronizm (eş-dost kayırmacılık) [Illness:cronyism (favoring friends and acquaintances)]. Retrieved April 12, 2006, From http://www.canaktan.org/din-ahlak/ahlak/ siyasal-hastaliklar/kronizm.htm
  • Aristotle. (1983). Politika [Politics]. (M.Tunçay, Trans.), Istanbul, Remzi Press.(Original work published 1979).
  • Baydar, T. (2005). Yönetim etiğine genel bir bakış [Introduction to administrative ethics]. Turk Administration Journal, 449, 47-74.
  • Bayhan, V.(2002). Demokrasi ve sivil toplum örgütlerinin engelleri; patronaj ve nepotizm [Handicaps for democracy and non-governmental organizations; patronage and nepotism]. Sivas Republic University Social Sciences Journal, 26(1), 1-13.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1996). Türk yükseköğretiminde araştırma eğitimi [Research study in Turkish higher education]. Unpublished Ph.D.Dissertation. Ankara University.
  • Dönmez, R. (2003). Tecil kurumunun hukuki niteliği, unsurları ve kamu alacaklarinin tecilinde idarenin takdir yetkisi [Legal attribute of deferment institution, components and discretionary authority in postponement of public demanders]. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://home.anadolu.edu.tr/~rdonmez/tecil.htm.
  • Employee favoritism, (n.d). Retrieved 10 October, 2006, from http://www.anonymousemployee.com/csssite/sidelinks/employee_favoritism.php
  • Gözübüyük, Ş. (1983). Hukuka giriş ve hukukun temel ilkeleri [Introduction to law and main concepts]. Ankara: S Press.
  • Hayajenh, A. F., Maghrabi A. S., & Al-Dabbagh, T. H.(1994). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers, International Journal of Manpower, 15(1), 60-67.
  • Khatri, N., Tsang, W. K. E., & Begley, T. M. (2006). Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 61-65.
  • Kim, K-ho. (2004). Favoritism and reverse discrimination, Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.economics. adelaide.edu.au/staff/kim/favoritism.pdf.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Krijcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30. 607-610.
  • Kwon, I. (2005). Endogenous favoritism in organizations, topics in theoretical economics, Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.econ.iastate.edu/calendar/ papers/ Kwon _Paper.pdf.
  • Ministry of Turkish National Educational (2006). Milli eğitim bakanlığı eğitim kurumları yöneticilerinin atama ve yer değiştirme yönetmeliği [Appointment and assignment regulations for the administrators of ministry of national education], (Publication March 04, 2006), Ankara: Government Printing Office.
  • Morettini, P. (2005). Favoritism in the high tech workplace. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.pjmconsult.com/2005/11/favoritism-in-high-tech-workplace.tml.
  • Nadler, J., & Schulman, M. (2006). Favoritism, cronyism, and nepotism. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/governmentethics/ introduction/cronyism.html#q2.
  • Onar, S. S. (1942). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
  • Özsemerci, K. (2002). Türk kamu yönetiminde yolsuzluklar, nedenleri, zararları ve çözüm önerileri [Malpractices in Turkish public administration, its reasons, damage and solution suggestions], Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/ yayin/elek/ ekutupana2.asp?id =409.
  • Pektaş, E. K. (1999). Büyük kent belediyelerinin eğitim ve kültür hizmetlerine siyasal parti ideolojilerinin yansıması [Reflection of political party ideologies to educational and cultural services of big city municipalities], Retrieved August 09, 2006, from http://www.ekitapyayin .com/id/027/ikincibolum1.htm .
  • Wong, L. C., & Kleiner, B. H. (1994). Nepotism. Work Study, 43 (5),10-12.
  • Yayla, Y. (1985). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Filiz Press.
Yıl 2009, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 2009, 19 - 35, 19.05.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A.S., & Raggad, B.G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554- 570.
  • Akkoyunlu, E. (1998). Çevre etiği (Environmental ethics). Ankara: TODAI Press.
  • Aktan, C. (n.d). Hastalığın adı: kronizm (eş-dost kayırmacılık) [Illness:cronyism (favoring friends and acquaintances)]. Retrieved April 12, 2006, From http://www.canaktan.org/din-ahlak/ahlak/ siyasal-hastaliklar/kronizm.htm
  • Aristotle. (1983). Politika [Politics]. (M.Tunçay, Trans.), Istanbul, Remzi Press.(Original work published 1979).
  • Baydar, T. (2005). Yönetim etiğine genel bir bakış [Introduction to administrative ethics]. Turk Administration Journal, 449, 47-74.
  • Bayhan, V.(2002). Demokrasi ve sivil toplum örgütlerinin engelleri; patronaj ve nepotizm [Handicaps for democracy and non-governmental organizations; patronage and nepotism]. Sivas Republic University Social Sciences Journal, 26(1), 1-13.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1996). Türk yükseköğretiminde araştırma eğitimi [Research study in Turkish higher education]. Unpublished Ph.D.Dissertation. Ankara University.
  • Dönmez, R. (2003). Tecil kurumunun hukuki niteliği, unsurları ve kamu alacaklarinin tecilinde idarenin takdir yetkisi [Legal attribute of deferment institution, components and discretionary authority in postponement of public demanders]. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://home.anadolu.edu.tr/~rdonmez/tecil.htm.
  • Employee favoritism, (n.d). Retrieved 10 October, 2006, from http://www.anonymousemployee.com/csssite/sidelinks/employee_favoritism.php
  • Gözübüyük, Ş. (1983). Hukuka giriş ve hukukun temel ilkeleri [Introduction to law and main concepts]. Ankara: S Press.
  • Hayajenh, A. F., Maghrabi A. S., & Al-Dabbagh, T. H.(1994). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers, International Journal of Manpower, 15(1), 60-67.
  • Khatri, N., Tsang, W. K. E., & Begley, T. M. (2006). Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 61-65.
  • Kim, K-ho. (2004). Favoritism and reverse discrimination, Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.economics. adelaide.edu.au/staff/kim/favoritism.pdf.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Krijcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30. 607-610.
  • Kwon, I. (2005). Endogenous favoritism in organizations, topics in theoretical economics, Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.econ.iastate.edu/calendar/ papers/ Kwon _Paper.pdf.
  • Ministry of Turkish National Educational (2006). Milli eğitim bakanlığı eğitim kurumları yöneticilerinin atama ve yer değiştirme yönetmeliği [Appointment and assignment regulations for the administrators of ministry of national education], (Publication March 04, 2006), Ankara: Government Printing Office.
  • Morettini, P. (2005). Favoritism in the high tech workplace. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.pjmconsult.com/2005/11/favoritism-in-high-tech-workplace.tml.
  • Nadler, J., & Schulman, M. (2006). Favoritism, cronyism, and nepotism. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/governmentethics/ introduction/cronyism.html#q2.
  • Onar, S. S. (1942). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
  • Özsemerci, K. (2002). Türk kamu yönetiminde yolsuzluklar, nedenleri, zararları ve çözüm önerileri [Malpractices in Turkish public administration, its reasons, damage and solution suggestions], Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/ yayin/elek/ ekutupana2.asp?id =409.
  • Pektaş, E. K. (1999). Büyük kent belediyelerinin eğitim ve kültür hizmetlerine siyasal parti ideolojilerinin yansıması [Reflection of political party ideologies to educational and cultural services of big city municipalities], Retrieved August 09, 2006, from http://www.ekitapyayin .com/id/027/ikincibolum1.htm .
  • Wong, L. C., & Kleiner, B. H. (1994). Nepotism. Work Study, 43 (5),10-12.
  • Yayla, Y. (1985). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Filiz Press.
Yıl 2009, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 2009, 19 - 35, 19.05.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A.S., & Raggad, B.G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554- 570.
  • Akkoyunlu, E. (1998). Çevre etiği (Environmental ethics). Ankara: TODAI Press.
  • Aktan, C. (n.d). Hastalığın adı: kronizm (eş-dost kayırmacılık) [Illness:cronyism (favoring friends and acquaintances)]. Retrieved April 12, 2006, From http://www.canaktan.org/din-ahlak/ahlak/ siyasal-hastaliklar/kronizm.htm
  • Aristotle. (1983). Politika [Politics]. (M.Tunçay, Trans.), Istanbul, Remzi Press.(Original work published 1979).
  • Baydar, T. (2005). Yönetim etiğine genel bir bakış [Introduction to administrative ethics]. Turk Administration Journal, 449, 47-74.
  • Bayhan, V.(2002). Demokrasi ve sivil toplum örgütlerinin engelleri; patronaj ve nepotizm [Handicaps for democracy and non-governmental organizations; patronage and nepotism]. Sivas Republic University Social Sciences Journal, 26(1), 1-13.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1996). Türk yükseköğretiminde araştırma eğitimi [Research study in Turkish higher education]. Unpublished Ph.D.Dissertation. Ankara University.
  • Dönmez, R. (2003). Tecil kurumunun hukuki niteliği, unsurları ve kamu alacaklarinin tecilinde idarenin takdir yetkisi [Legal attribute of deferment institution, components and discretionary authority in postponement of public demanders]. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://home.anadolu.edu.tr/~rdonmez/tecil.htm.
  • Employee favoritism, (n.d). Retrieved 10 October, 2006, from http://www.anonymousemployee.com/csssite/sidelinks/employee_favoritism.php
  • Gözübüyük, Ş. (1983). Hukuka giriş ve hukukun temel ilkeleri [Introduction to law and main concepts]. Ankara: S Press.
  • Hayajenh, A. F., Maghrabi A. S., & Al-Dabbagh, T. H.(1994). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers, International Journal of Manpower, 15(1), 60-67.
  • Khatri, N., Tsang, W. K. E., & Begley, T. M. (2006). Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 61-65.
  • Kim, K-ho. (2004). Favoritism and reverse discrimination, Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.economics. adelaide.edu.au/staff/kim/favoritism.pdf.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Krijcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30. 607-610.
  • Kwon, I. (2005). Endogenous favoritism in organizations, topics in theoretical economics, Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.econ.iastate.edu/calendar/ papers/ Kwon _Paper.pdf.
  • Ministry of Turkish National Educational (2006). Milli eğitim bakanlığı eğitim kurumları yöneticilerinin atama ve yer değiştirme yönetmeliği [Appointment and assignment regulations for the administrators of ministry of national education], (Publication March 04, 2006), Ankara: Government Printing Office.
  • Morettini, P. (2005). Favoritism in the high tech workplace. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://www.pjmconsult.com/2005/11/favoritism-in-high-tech-workplace.tml.
  • Nadler, J., & Schulman, M. (2006). Favoritism, cronyism, and nepotism. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/governmentethics/ introduction/cronyism.html#q2.
  • Onar, S. S. (1942). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
  • Özsemerci, K. (2002). Türk kamu yönetiminde yolsuzluklar, nedenleri, zararları ve çözüm önerileri [Malpractices in Turkish public administration, its reasons, damage and solution suggestions], Retrieved June 8, 2006, from http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/ yayin/elek/ ekutupana2.asp?id =409.
  • Pektaş, E. K. (1999). Büyük kent belediyelerinin eğitim ve kültür hizmetlerine siyasal parti ideolojilerinin yansıması [Reflection of political party ideologies to educational and cultural services of big city municipalities], Retrieved August 09, 2006, from http://www.ekitapyayin .com/id/027/ikincibolum1.htm .
  • Wong, L. C., & Kleiner, B. H. (1994). Nepotism. Work Study, 43 (5),10-12.
  • Yayla, Y. (1985). İdare hukuku [Administrative law]. Istanbul: Filiz Press.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA22JN42AK
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İsmail Aydogan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Mayıs 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 2009

Kaynak Göster

APA Aydogan, İ. (2016). Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, 4(1), 19-35.
AMA Aydogan İ. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. Mayıs 2016;4(1):19-35.
Chicago Aydogan, İsmail. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4, sy. 1 (Mayıs 2016): 19-35.
EndNote Aydogan İ (01 Mayıs 2016) Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4 1 19–35.
IEEE İ. Aydogan, “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”, Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, c. 4, sy. 1, ss. 19–35, 2016.
ISNAD Aydogan, İsmail. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research 4/1 (Mayıs 2016), 19-35.
JAMA Aydogan İ. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;4:19–35.
MLA Aydogan, İsmail. “Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage”. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research, c. 4, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 19-35.
Vancouver Aydogan İ. Favoritism in the Turkish Educational System: Nepotism, Cronyism and Patronage. Educational Policy Analysis And Strategic Research. 2016;4(1):19-35.