KNOWLEDGES FOR EFFECTIVE INTEGRATION OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 , 226 - 231, 01.09.2014

Páraic Treacy John O’donoghue

Öz

The level and complexity of knowledge held by a
teacher affects what is done in classrooms and, as a consequence, also
influences what students learn (Fennema and Franke 1992). Integrating
mathematics and science requires the teacher in question to have a certain
level of both content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge to educate students
in both disciplines successfully (Frykholm and Glasson 2005).  Consequently, the knowledges required to
effectively instruct students in an integrated setting is a vital element of
the successful implementation of such lessons. 
Research indicates that a teacher’s content knowledge in the subjects he/she
teaches is of utmost importance, this translates to an integrative setting –
content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge within both mathematics and
science must be of a high standard to implement these lessons
successfully.  This can be achieved
through provision of the relevant resources, a working support structure, and
teacher training.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Integration, mathematics, science, knowledges, pedagogy

Kaynakça

• Alonzo, Alicia. (2002). Evaluation of a Model for Supporting the Development of Elementary School Teachers' Science Content Knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence Education Policy Analysis Archives (Vol. 8). Ernest, P. (1989). The Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of the Mathematics Teacher: A Model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33. Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 147-164). New York: McMillan. Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127-141. Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teacher characteristics. Education Next, 2(1), 50-55. Jacobs, H.H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation (pp. 1-13). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Karp, K.S. (1991). Elementary school teachers' attitudes toward mathematics: The impact on students' autonomous learning skills. School Science and Mathematics, 91(6), 265-270. Loughran, J John. (2012). Understanding and Developing ScienceTeachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Vol. 12): Springer. Mewborn, D. (2001). Teachers content knowledge, teacher education, and their effects on the preparation of elementary teachers in the United States. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 28-36. Rice, J.K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255-281. Sanders, Linda R, Borko, Hilda, & Lockard, J David. (1993). Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723-736. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Treacy, P. (2012). An Investigation into the Integration of Mathematics and Science at Junior Cycle in Irish Post Primary Schools. (Doctorate), University of Limerick. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10344/2855 Wilkins, J.L.M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139-164.