EXAMINATION OF ATTITUDES OF COMPULSORY EDUCATION TEACHERS IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA TOWARD THE INTEGRATION OF ICT TECHNOLOGY IN DAILY WORK

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 , 243 - 249, 01.09.2014

Ljubica Bakıć-tomıć

Öz

There are a
number of measurement instruments in the field of education the aims of which
are to measure various aspects of educational technology. The instrument that
we used in this study is a survey of social and technical factors affecting teachers'
use of technology designed by E. Papanastasiou and C. Angeli in 2008. The
sample of this study included 413 teachers teaching in public elementary
schools in Zagreb. The aim of this study is to show social and technical
factors that play an important role in the successful integration of ICT in
schools and to answer the question to what extent and how each of these factors
affects the successful integration of ICT in schools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teachers' use of ICT, social factors affecting teachers' use of technology, technical factors affecting teachers' use of technology, public elementary schools in Zagreb

Kaynakça

• Albirini, A. A. (2006). Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47, 373-398. Al-Zaidiyeen, N.J., Mei, L.L. &Fook, F.S., (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: the case of Jordan. International Education Studies 3(2) Baylor, A. & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(1), 395-414. Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: an examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211–237. Chang, S. & Tung, F., (2008). An empirical investigation of students´ behavioural intentions to use online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(1) 71–83. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 19(2). Cox, M., Preston, C. & Cox, K. (1999). What Factors Support or Prevent Teachers from Using ICT in their Classrooms? Retrieved on the 18th of February 2014 from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm Delcourt, M. &Kinzie, M. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education 27(1), 35–41. Dogan, M. (2010). Primary trainee teachers’ attitudes to and use of computer and technology in mathematics: The case of Turkey. Educational Research and Review 5(11), 690–702. Drent, M. &Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computer & Education 51,187–199. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J. &Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teach¬ers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education 51, 1499– 1509. Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., &Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 549–577. Kiridis, A., Drossos, Y. &Tsakiridou, H. (2006). Teachers facing information and communication technology (ICT): The case of Greece. Technology and Teacher Education 14(1), 75–96. Koohang, A. A. (1989). A study of the attitudes toward computers: anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2), 137–150. Isleem, M. (2003). Relationships of selected factors and the level of computer use for instructional purposes by technology education teachers in Ohio public schools: a statewide survey. Doctoral dissertation, the Ohio State University.
• Palak, D. & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 41, pp.157-181. Papanastasiou, E. C & Angeli C. (2008). Evaluating the Use of ICT in Education: Psychometric Properties of the Survey of Factors Affecting teachers Teaching with Technology (SFA-T). Educational Technology & Society, 11, 69-86. Papastergiou, M. (2010). Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ self-efficacy and attitudes regarding information and communication technologies through a computer lit¬eracy course. Computer & Education 54, 298–308. Pelgrum, W.J, (1993). Attitudes of school principals and teachers toward computers: Does it mat¬ter what they think? Studies in Educational Evaluation 19, 199–212. Player –Coro, C. (2012). Factors influencing Teachers' use of ICT in education. Education Inquiry, Vol.3,No.1, pp. 93-108. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press. Russel, A.L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers & Educa¬tion 25(4), 173–178. Russell, G. & Bradley, G. (1997). Teachers’ computer anxiety: implications for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, Vol.2, No.1,pp. 17–30. Samak, Z.A. (2006). An exploration of Jordanian English language teachers’ attitudes, skills and access as indicator of information and communication technology integration in Jordan. Doctoral Thesis. Retrieved on the 18th of February 2014 from:http://www.academia.edu/469525/An_Exploration_of_Jordanian_English_Language_Teachers_Attitudes_Skills_and_Access_as_Indicator_of_Information_and_Communication_Technology_ICT_Integration_in_ Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J.& Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp.103-112. Selwyn, N. (1997). Students' attitudes toward computers: validation of a computer attitude scale for 16–19 education. Computers & Education, 28(1), 35–41. Zhao, Y. & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teachers' adoption of technology: a perceptual control theory perspective. Journal for Technology and Teacher Education 9 (1), pp. 5-30.