Impacts of Health-Promoting Lifestyle and Personality Traits on Quality of Life in University Students

Öz

Purpose: The aims of this study were (1) to examine the quality of life, health-promoting lifestyle, and personality traits, and (2) to determine the relationship between the quality of life, and these factors among university students. Material and Methods: The undergraduate students were invited in this cross-sectional survey. A total of 263 students responded to the online survey. Quality of life, health-promoting lifestyle, and personality traits were assessed using the Short Form 36, Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II, and Eysenck personality questionnaire, respectively. Results: General health was weakly and positively associated with spiritual growth, stress management, but negatively associated with neuroticism (p<0.001). Role emotional and social function were weakly and negatively associated with neuroticism (p<0.001). Mental health was weakly and positively associated with physical activity behaviour, spiritual growth, interpersonal relationship, stress management while it was moderately and negatively associated with neuroticism (p<0.001). Discussion: The results revealed that the general health, vitality and mental health parameters in quality of life had positive relationships with spiritual growth and stress management. Moreover, most parameters in quality of life were negatively related to neuroticism personality traits. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage spiritual growth, teach stress management and improve personality traits in university students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• students
• quality of life
• personality

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Sağlığı Geliştirici Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları ve Kişilik Özelliklerinin Yaşam Kalitesine Etkileri

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amaçları; (1) üniversite öğrencilerinde yaşam kalitesi, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ve kişilik özelliklerini incelemek ve (2) yaşam kalitesi ile bu faktörler arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu kesitsel ankete lisans öğrencileri davet edildi. Çevrimiçi anketi toplam 263 öğrenci yanıtladı. Yaşam kalitesi, sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ve kişilik özellikleri sırasıyla; Kısa Form 36, Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları Ölçeği ve Eysenck Kişilik Anketi kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Yaşam kalitesindeki genel sağlık ruhsal gelişim ve stres yönetimi ile zayıf fakat pozitif yönlü ilişkiliyken, nevrotik kişilik özelliği ile negatif yönde ilişkiliydi (p<0,001). Yaşam kalitesindeki duygusal rol ve sosyal işlev de nevrotik kişilik özelliği ile negatif yönde ilişkiliydi (p<0,001). Yaşam kalitesindeki ruh sağlığı fiziksel aktivite davranışı, ruhsal gelişim, kişilerarası ilişki ve stres yönetimi ile zayıf fakat pozitif yönlü ilişkiliyken, nevrotik kişilik özelliği ile orta derecede negatif yönde ilişkiliydi (p<0,001). Tartışma: Sonuçlar, yaşam kalitesindeki genel sağlık, enerji ve ruh sağlığı parametrelerinin ruhsal gelişim ve stres yönetimi ile olumlu ilişkilere sahip olduğunu ortaya koydu. Dahası, yaşam kalitesindeki çoğu parametre nevrotik kişilik özellikleriyle olumsuz yönde ilişkiliydi. Bu nedenle üniversite öğrencilerinde ruhsal gelişimi teşvik etmek, stres yönetimini öğretmek ve kişilik özelliklerini geliştirmek gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğrenciler
• Kişilik
• Yaşam Kalitesi

Kaynakça

1. Delaun, S., & Ladner, P. (2002). Fundamental of nursing: standards and practice, (Fourth Edition, p. 65). Australia: WB Delmar Co.
2. Tol, A., Tavassoli, E., Shariferad, G. R., & Shojaeezadeh, D. (2013). Health-promoting lifestyle and quality of life among undergraduate students at school of health, Isfahan university of medical sciences. J. Educ. Health Promot., 2(11), 29-32. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9531.108006
3. Thomas, G. N., Wang, M. P., Ho, S. Y., Mak, K. H., Cheng, K. K., & Lam, T. H. (2014). Adverse lifestyle leads to an annual excess of 2 million deaths in China. PloS one, 9(2). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089650
4. Ma, J., Flanders, W. D., Ward, E. M., & Jemal, A. (2011). Body mass index in young adulthood and premature death: analyses of the US National Health Interview Survey linked mortality files. Am. J. Epidemiol., 174(8), 934-944. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr169
5. Preston, D. B., Green, G. W., & Irwin, P. A. (1990). An assessment of college health nursing practice: a wellness perspective. J. Community Health Nurs., 7(2), 97-104. DOI: 10.1207/s15327655jchn0702_6
6. Amiri, M., Raei, M., Sadeghi, E., Keikavoosi-Arani, L., & Khosravi, A. (2023). Health-promoting lifestyle and its determining factors among students of public and private universities in Iran. J. Educ. Health Promot., 12(1), 239. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_963_22
7. Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016). Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics, 34(7), 645-649. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9
8. Berlim, M. T., & Fleck, M. (2003). "Quality of life": a brand new concept for research and practice in psychiatry. Braz J Psychiatry, 25(4), 249-252. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-44462003000400013

9. Pekmezovic, T., Popovic, A., Tepavcevic, D., Gazibara, T., & Paunic, M. (2011). Factors associated with health-related quality of life among Belgrade University students. Qual. Life Res., 20(3), 391-397. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9754-x
10. Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Mastoras, S. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence, coping and exam‐related stress in Canadian undergraduate students. Aust. J. Psychol., 62(1), 42-50. DOI: 10.1080/00049530903312899
11. Saklofske, D. H., Austin, E. J., Mastoras, S. M., Beaton, L., & Osborne, S. E. (2012). Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: different patterns of association for stress and success. Learn. Individ. Differ., 22(2), 251-257. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.010
12. Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L., & Suleiman, A. B. (2018). Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature, 554(7693), 441-450. DOI:10.1038/nature25770
13. Lawrence, E. M., Mollborn, S., & Hummer, R. A. (2017). Health lifestyles across the transition to adulthood: implications for health. Soc Sci Med, 193, 23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.041
14. Nakamura, T. (2008). The integration of school nutrition program into health promotion and prevention of lifestyle-related diseases in Japan. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr., 17, 349-351.
15. American College Health Association. (2007). American College Health Association National College Health Assessment Spring 2006 reference group data report (abridged). J. Am. Coll. Health, 55(4), 195-206. DOI: 10.3200/JACH.55.4.195-206
16. Hawks, S. R., Madanat, H. N., Merrill, R. M., Goudy, M. B., & Miyagawa, T. (2003). A cross-cultural analysis of ‘motivation for eating’ as a potential factor in the emergence of global obesity: Japan and the United States. Health Promot. Int., 18(2), 153-162. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/18.2.153
17. Werch, C. E. C., Bian, H., Moore, M. J., Ames, S., DiClemente, C. C., & Weiler, R. M. (2007). Brief multiple behavior interventions in a college student health care clinic. J. Adolesc. Health, 41(6), 577-585. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.06.003
18. Crovetto, M., Valladares, M., Espinoza, V., Mena, F., Oñate, G., Fernandez, M. et. al. (2018). Effect of healthy and unhealthy habits on obesity: a multicentric study. Nutrition, 54, 7-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.02.003
19. Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 65, 719-742. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123
20. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (2013). The biological basis of personality. In Personality Structure and Measurement (Psychology Revivals) (pp. 49-62). Routledge.
21. Curtin, F., & Schulz, P. (1998). Multiple correlations and Bonferroni’s correction. Biol. Psychiatry, 44(8), 775-777. DOI:10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00043-2
22. Aceijas, C., & Waldhäusl, S. (2017). Determinants of health-related lifestyles among university students. Perspect. Public Health, 137(4), 227-236. DOI: 10.1177/1757913916666875
23. Ruvalcaba-Romero, N. A., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Salazar-Estrada, J. G., & Gallegos-Guajardo, J. (2017). Positive emotions, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships and social support as mediators between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 9(1), 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.08.001
24. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev, 27(1), 17-40. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
25. Gale, C. R., Hagenaars, S. P., Davies, G., Hill, W. D., Liewald, D. C., Cullen, B., et al. (2016). Pleiotropy between neuroticism and physical and mental health: findings from 108,038 men and women in UK Biobank. Transl. Psychiatry, 6(4), e791-e791. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2016.56
26. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. Am. Psychol., 64(4), 241. DOI:10.1037/a0015309
27. Jaconelli, A., Stephan, Y., Canada, B., & Chapman, B. P. (2013). Personality and physical functioning among older adults: the moderating role of education. J. Gerontol. - B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., 68(4), 553-557. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs094
28. Ju, H. (2017). The relationship between physical activity, meaning in life, and subjective vitality in community-dwelling older adults. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr., 73, 120-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.08.001
29. Weare, K. (2000). Promoting mental, emotional, and social health: a whole school approach, (1st Edition). London: Routledge.DOI: 10.4324/9780203048610
30. Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: facts and intervention. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 4(6), 196-200.DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep107726
31. Piotrowski, M. C., Lunsford, J., & Gaynes, B. N. (2021). Lifestyle psychiatry for depression and anxiety: beyond diet and exercise. Lifestyle Medicine, 2(1), e21.DOI: 10.1002/lim2.21
32. Fernández-Bustos, J. G., Infantes-Paniagua, Á., Cuevas, R., & Contreras, O. R. (2019). Effect of physical activity on self-concept: Theoretical model on the mediation of body image and physical self-concept in adolescents. Front. Psychol., 10, 468127.DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01537