Work ergonomics and risk factors: Are laboratory professionals at risk?

Yıl 2024, , 111 - 122, 12.09.2024

Güleser Güney Yılmaz , Elif Aydın , Duygu Perçin Renders

https://doi.org/10.30720/ered.1421877

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to examine in detail the ergonomic risk factors among laboratory professionals in physical, psychological and individual terms. Material and Methods: 60 participants included the study. Demographic form, Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ), in which personal factors were examined for individuals who agreed to be included in the research; Work Stress Scale (WSS) and Beck Depression scale were evaluated with online forms prepared by Google Forms to evaluate psychosocial risk factors. REBA was used to determine the physical risk factors during the study and RULA Employee Assessment was used to evaluate the risk factors related to the upper extremity. Results: When the ergonomic risk factors were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between REBA, RULA, OBQ and WSS scores (p<0.05). Discussion: Microbiology laboratory and pathology laboratory professionals are in the highest risk group in terms of both whole-body score and upper extremity. Biochemistry laboratory professionals, on the other hand, are in the category of moderately severe risk, especially since they are in a standing position for a long-time during device use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ergonomics, laboratory personnel, risk factors

Çalışma Ergonomisi ve Risk Faktörleri: Laboratuvar Profesyonelleri Risk Altında mı?

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, laboratuvar çalışanları arasında fiziksel, psikolojik ve bireysel açılardan ergonomik risk faktörlerini detaylı bir şekilde incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Materyal ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 60 katılımcı dahil edildi. Araştırmaya dahil olmayı kabul eden bireyler için kişisel faktörlerin incelendiği Aktivite Rol Dengesi Anketi (OBQ11-T); psikososyal risk faktörlerini değerlendirmek için çevrim içi olarak hazırlanan Google Forms formları ile İş Stresi Ölçeği (İSÖ) ve Beck Depresyon Ölçeği değerlendirildi. Fiziksel risk faktörlerini belirlemek için çalışma sırasında REBA kullanıldı ve üst ekstremite ile ilgili risk faktörlerini değerlendirmek için RULA Çalışan Değerlendirmesi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ergonomik risk faktörleri karşılaştırıldığında, REBA, RULA, OBQ ve İSÖ skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0,05). Tartışma: Mikrobiyoloji ve patoloji laboratuvarı çalışanları, hem tüm vücut skoru hem de üst ekstremite açısından en yüksek risk grubunda bulunmaktadır. Biyokimya laboratuvarı çalışanları ise özellikle cihaz kullanımı sırasında uzun süre ayakta olduklarından dolayı orta derecede ciddi risk kategorisindedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ergonomi, laboratuvar personeli, risk faktörleri

Etik Beyan

The study was approved by the local institutional ethical board (Kütahya Health Sciences University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee, (registration number 2022/12-02) and conducted in consideration of Helsinki’s Declaration principles.

Destekleyen Kurum

Not applicable

Teşekkür

We thank all physicians and laboratory staff who participated in the study.

Kaynakça

• Agrawal, P. R., Maiya, A. G., Kamath, V., & Kamath, A. (2014). Musculoskeletal disorders among medical laboratory professionals-a prevalence study. Int J Res Med Sci, 10(2), 77-81. doi:10.3316/informit.751123520529504
• Aktaş, A. M. (2001). Bir kamu kuruluşunun üst düzey yöneticilerinin iş stresi ve kişilik özellikleri. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 56(04). doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000001872
• AlShammari, W., Alhussain, H., & Rizk, N. M. (2021). Risk management assessments and recommendations among students, staffs, and health care professionals in educational biomedical laboratories. Risk Manag Healthc Policy, 185-198. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S278162
• Andersen, E. (2004). Laboratory professionals and musculoskeletal disorders—examining ergonomic risk factors and solutions. AAOHN J, 52(9), 366-367. doi:10.1177/2165079904052009
• Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol, 56(6), 893. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893
• Boynton, F. D., Dunbar, M., & Koewler, N. (2020). General experimental techniques. The Laboratory Rat (Third Edition, pp. 771-809). Elsevier.
• Carayon, P., Smith, M. J., & Haims, M. C. (1999). Work organization, job stress, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Hum factors, 41(4), 644-663. doi: 10.1518/001872099779656743
• Cheţa, M., Marcu, M. V., & Borz, S. A. (2018). Workload, exposure to noise, and risk of musculoskeletal disorders: A case study of motor-manual tree feeling and processing in poplar clear cuts. Forests, 9(6), doi:10.3390/f9060300
• Da Costa, B. R., & Vieira, E. R. (2010). Risk factors for work‐related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med, 53(3), 285-323. doi:10.1002/ajim.20750
• David, G. C. (2005). Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Lond), 55(3), 190-199. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi082
• El‐Helaly, M., Balkhy, H. H., & Vallenius, L. (2017). Carpal tunnel syndrome among laboratory technicians in relation to personal and ergonomic factors at work. J Occup Health, 59(6), 513-520. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0279-OA
• Günal, A., Pekçetin, S., Demirtürk, F., Şenol, H., Håkansson, C., & Wagman, P. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Turkish occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ11-T). Scand J Occup Ther, 27(7), 493-499. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1673479
• Günay, İ. C., Alayunt, F. N., & Çakmak, B. (2017). Mikrobiyoloji laboratuvarlarinda ergonomi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5, 41-47. doi: 10.21923/jesd.95864
• Güney Yılmaz, G., Avcı, H., & Akı, E. (2023). A new tool to measure occupational balance: Adolescent Occupational Balance Scale (A-OBS). Scand J Occup Ther, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2154262
• Haile, E. L., Taye, B., & Hussen, F. (2012). Ergonomic workstations and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the clinical laboratory. Lab Med., 43(suppl_2), e11-e19. doi: 10.1309/LM7BQ15TTQFBXIS
• Haynes CE, Wall TD, Bolden RI, and Rick JE (1999) Measures of perceived work characteristics for health services research: Test of a measurement model and normative data. Br J Health Psychol, 4: 257-275. doi: 10.1348/135910799168614
• Hignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergo, 31(2), 201-205. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3
• Hisli, N. (1989). Beck depresyon envanterinin universite ogrencileri icin gecerliligi, guvenilirligi. (A reliability and validity study of Beck Depression Inventory in a university student sample). J. Psychol., 7, 3-13.
• Jain, G., & Shetty, P. (2014). Occupational concerns associated with regular use of microscope. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 27, 591-598. doi: 10.2478/s13382-014-0288-2
• Kocabaş, M. (2009). Ağır Ve Tehlikeli Işlerde Çalışan Iş Görenlerde Zorlanmaya Neden Olan Çalışma Duruşlarının Analizi (Yüksek lisans tezi) Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
• Labriola, M., Lund, T., & Burr, H. (2006). Prospective study of physical and psychosocial risk factors for sickness absence. Occup Med (Lond)., 56(7), 469-474. doi:10.1093/occmed/kql058
• McAtamney, L., & Corlett, N. (2004). Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, (First Edition, pp. 86-96). CRC Press.
• Mukhtad, A. A., Aminese, H. A., Mansor, M. A., Mansour, H. S., & Elmesmary, H. A. (2018). Ergonomic risk assessment among healthcare laboratory technicians in Benghazi medical centre. International Journal for Advance Research and Development, 3(3), 318-327.
• Oladeinde, B. H., Omoregie, R., Osakue, E. O., & Onifade, A. A. (2012). Evaluation of laboratory request forms for incomplete data at a rural tertiary hospital in Nigeria. N. Z. J. Med. Lab. Sci, 66(2), 39-41. doi: 10.30442/ahr.0402-7-18
• Ozdemir, Y., Gul, M., & Celik, E. (2017). Assessment of occupational hazards and associated risks in fuzzy environment: a case study of a university chemical laboratory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 23(4), 895-924. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1292844
• Patrao, A. I. D., Pais, S., Mohandas, L., & Shah, M. (2022). Activities of microscopy and pathology cause the most musculoskeletal discomfort for medical laboratory professionals-Results from a detailed ergonomic analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 92, 103349.
• Rowan, M. P., & Wright, P. C. (1994). Ergonomics is good for business. Work study, 43(8), 7-12. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000004015
• Vandergrift, J. L., Gold, J. E., Hanlon, A., & Punnett, L. (2012). Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing professionals. Occup Environ Med, 69(1), 29-34. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.061770
• Wagman, P., & Håkansson, C. (2014). Introducing the occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ). Scand J Occup Ther, 21(3), 227-231. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.900571
• Widiyawati, S., Lukodono, R. P., Lustyana, A. T., & Pradana, I. A. (2020). Investigation of the risk of daily officer work posture based on rapid upper limb assessment (Rula) method. Int. J. Hum. Mov. Sports Sci., 8(1), 24-31. doi: 10.13189/saj.2020.080103