Relationship Between Play Skills and Functional School Readiness Skills in Typically Developing Kindergarten-Aged Children

Öz

Purpose: This study examined the relationship between play skills and functional school readiness, including school participation, task support, and school performance, in typically developing kindergarten-aged children. Material and Methods: A total of 97 children aged 57–71 months were observed using the Revised Knox Preschool Play Scale and the School Function Assessment. Relationships between play skills and functional school readiness were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: Moderate correlations were found between specific play dimensions and functional school readiness indicators (p<0.05). Space management, including gross motor play, was moderately associated with physical task support (r=0.428) and performance (r=0.471). Material management was moderately correlated with cognitive/behavioral task support (r=0.412) and cognitive/behavioral task performance (r=0.450). Pretense/symbolic play was moderately associated with cognitive/behavioral task support (r=0.415) and cognitive/behavioral task performance (r=0.413), while participation in play was moderately related to overall school participation (r=0.471). Conclusion: The findings emphasize the importance of different play experiences in supporting physical, cognitive, and social aspects of functional school readiness, including school participation, task support, and school-related performance. The study highlights the value of play-based approaches in early education and underscores the role of occupational therapy in supporting children’s participation and functional engagement in school environments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• early childhood
• occupational therapy
• play
• School

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Etik Beyan

The study was approved by the Fenerbahçe Ethics Committee for Non-Interventional Research (date 12.04.2023 registration number 71.2023fbu) and conducted in consideration of Helsinki’s Declaration principles.

Teşekkür

We would like to express our gratitude to our participants who voluntarily participated in the assessments and contributed their time, effort, and valuable data to this study.

Tipik Gelişim Gösteren Anaokulu Çocuklarında Oyun Becerileri ve Fonksiyonel Okula Hazır Bulunuşluk Becerileri Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, tipik gelişim gösteren anaokulu çağındaki çocuklarda oyun becerileri ile okul katılımı, görev desteği ve okul performansı da dahil olmak üzere işlevsel okula hazırbulunuşluğu arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 57-71 aylık toplam 97 çocuk, Revize Edilmiş Knox Okul Öncesi Oyun Ölçeği ve Okul Fonksiyon Değerlendirmesi kullanılarak gözlemlenmiştir. Oyun becerileri ile işlevsel okula hazırbulunuşluk arasındaki ilişkiler Spearman sıra korelasyon katsayısı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar: Belirli oyun boyutları ile işlevsel okula hazırbulunuşluk göstergeleri arasında orta düzeyde korelasyonlar bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Kaba motor oyun da dahil olmak üzere alan yönetimi, fiziksel görev desteği (r=0,428) ve performans (r=0,471) ile orta düzeyde ilişkili bulunmuştur. Materyal yönetimi, bilişsel/davranışsal görev desteği (r=0,412) ve bilişsel/davranışsal görev performansı (r=0,450) ile orta düzeyde korelasyon göstermiştir. Taklit/sembolik oyun, bilişsel/davranışsal görev desteği (r=0,415) ve bilişsel/davranışsal görev performansı (r=0,413) ile orta düzeyde ilişkili iken, oyuna katılım genel okul katılımıyla orta düzeyde ilişkiliydi (r=0,471). Tartışma: Bulgular, okul katılımı, görev desteği ve okul performansı da dahil olmak üzere işlevsel okula hazır bulunuşluğun fiziksel, bilişsel ve sosyal yönlerini desteklemede farklı oyun deneyimlerinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, erken eğitimde oyun temelli yaklaşımların değerini ortaya koymakta ve çocukların okul ortamlarında katılımını ve işlevsel etkileşimini desteklemede ergoterapinin rolünün altını çizmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ergoterapi
• oyun
• Erken Çocukluk Çağı
• Okul

Destekleyen Kurum

Yoktur

Etik Beyan

Çalışma, Fenerbahçe Girişimsel Olmayan Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu tarafından onaylanmıştır (tarih 12.04.2023, kayıt numarası 71.2023fbu) ve Helsinki Bildirgesi ilkeleri dikkate alınarak yürütülmüştür.

Teşekkür

Değerlendirmelere gönüllü olarak katılan ve zamanlarını, emeklerini ve değerli verilerini bu çalışmaya katkıda bulunan katılımcılarımıza minnettarlığımızı ifade etmek isteriz.

Kaynakça

1. Axford, C., Joosten, A. V., & Harris, C. (2018). iPad applications that required a range of motor skills promoted motor coordination in children commencing primary school. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12450
2. Bergen, D. (2002). The role of pretend play in children's cognitive development. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(1), Article n1. http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/index.html
3. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Pearson Education/Merrill.
4. Bohlmann, N. L., & Downer, J. T. (2016). Self-regulation and task engagement as predictors of emergent language and literacy skills. Early Education and Development, 27(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1046784
5. Brownell, C. A., Zerwas, S., & Balaram, G. (2002). Peers, cooperative play, and the development of empathy in children. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02300013
6. Bumin, G., Akyürek, G., Temizkan, E., & Yaylacı, İ. (2025). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the School Function Assessment in children with special needs. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 18(1), 45-58.https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2023.2301086
7. Cameron, C. E. (Ed.). (2018). Understanding foundational cognitive skills. In Hands on, minds on: How executive function, motor, and spatial skills foster school readiness? (pp. 41–56). Teachers College Press.
8. Cankaya, O., Rohatyn-Martin, N., Leach, J., Taylor, K., & Bulut, O. (2023). Preschool children’s loose parts play and the relationship to cognitive development: A review of the literature. Journal of Intelligence, 11(8), Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11080151

9. Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200410
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Coster, W. J., Deeney, T. A., Haltiwanger, J. T., & Haley, S. M. (1998). School Function Assessment. Psychological Corporation/Therapy Skill Builders.
12. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
13. Degirmenci, S. (2016). 48–72 aylık çocuklar için Yenilenmiş Knox Okul Öncesi Oyun Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
14. Fyffe, L., Sample, P. L., Lewis, A., Rattenborg, K., & Bundy, A. C. (2024). Entering kindergarten after years of play: A cross-case analysis of school readiness following play-based education.Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01428-w
15. Frikha, M., & Alharbi, R. S. (2023). Optimizing fine motor coordination, selective attention, and reaction time in children: Effect of combined accuracy exercises and visual art activities. Children, 10(5), Article 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050786
16. Janik Blaskova, L., & Gibson, J. L. (2021). Reviewing the link between language abilities and peer relations in children with developmental language disorder: The importance of children’s own perspectives. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 6(2021), 23969415211021515. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415211021515
17. Kay, L. (2022). ‘What works’ and for whom? Bold Beginnings and the construction of the school ready child. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 20(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211052791
18. Kızıldere, E., Aktan-Erciyes, A., Tahiroğlu, D., & Göksun, T. (2020). A multidimensional investigation of pretend play and language competence: Concurrent and longitudinal relations in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 54(2020), 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100870
19. Knox, S. (2008). Development and current use of the Revised Knox Preschool Play Scale. In L. D. Parham & L. S. Fazio (Eds.), Play in occupational therapy for children (pp. 55–70). Mosby.
20. Lin, L.-Y., Cherng, R.-J., & Chen, Y.-J. (2017). Relationship between time use in physical activity and gross motor performance of preschool children. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12318
21. Lockman, J. J., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2021). Young children’s interactions with objects: Play as practice and practice as play. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
22. Loomans, D., & Kolberg, K. (2002). The laughing classroom: Everyone’s guide to teaching with humor and play. H. J. Kramer.
23. Lynch, H., & Moore, A. (2016). Play as an occupation in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(9), 519–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616664540
24. McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003
25. Miller, L. J., Anzalone, M. E., Lane, S. J., Cermak, S. A., & Osten, E. T. (2007). Concept evolution in sensory integration: A proposed nosology for diagnosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.135
26. Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1998). The development of play during childhood: Forms and possible functions.Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360641798001476
27. Rahmawati, A., Tairas, M. M. W., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2018). Children’s school readiness: Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10961/ijpte.v2i1.14876
28. Ricciardi, C., Manfra, L., Hartman, S., Bleiker, C., Dineheart, L., & Winsler, A. (2021). School readiness skills at age four predict academic achievement through fifth grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 57(4th Quarter 2021), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.05.006
29. Ring, K. (2010). Supporting a playful approach to drawing. In Play and learning in the early years (pp. 113–126). Routledge.
30. Roskos, K. A., & Christie, J. F. (2011). Mindbrain and play–literacy connections. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410390889
31. Russo, J. M., Williford, A. P., Markowitz, A. J., Vitiello, V. E., & Bassok, D. (2019). Examining the validity of a widely used school readiness assessment: Implications for teachers and early childhood programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 48(3rd Quarter 2019), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.02.003
32. Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Patterns of school readiness forecast achievement and socioemotional development at the end of elementary school. Child Development, 83(1), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01678.x
33. Schmidt, M., Benzing, V., & Kamer, M. (2016). Classroom-based physical activity breaks and children’s attention: Cognitive engagement works! Frontiers in Psychology, 7(2016), Article 1474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01474
34. Schneck, C. M. (2005). Visual perception. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 373–403). Mosby Elsevier.
35. Skene, K., O’Farrelly, C. M., Byrne, E. M., Kirby, N., Stevens, E. C., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2022). Can guidance during play enhance children’s learning and development in educational contexts? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 93(4), 1162-1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13730
36. Vazou, S., Pesce, C., Lakes, K., & Smiley-Oyen, A. (2019). More than one road leads to Rome: A narrative review and meta-analysis of physical activity intervention effects on cognition in youth. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1223423
37. Weisberg, D. S., Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Talking it up: Play, language development, and the role of adult support. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 39–54.
38. Whitebread, D., Basilio, M., Kuvalja, M., & Verma, M. (2012). The importance of play. Toy Industries of Europe.
39. Whitman, E. (2018). The impact of social play on young children (Master’s thesis). Murray State University.
40. Wilson, K., & Ryan, V. (2006). Play therapy: A non-directive approach for children and adolescents. Elsevier Health Sciences.
41. Worthington, M., Carruthers, E., & Hattingh, L. (2020). ‘This is the safe. It has a number and no one else knows it’: Playing with mathematics. In Mathematics in early childhood (pp. 167–185). Routledge.